Understanding and Encouraging Online Reviewing With a Selection-Based Review System

Online consumer reviews are important for people wishing to make purchases online. However, not everyone contributes online reviews. This paper looks at consumer motivations of reviewing and rating behaviour in order to motivate the design of a mobile interface for online reviewing. An interview study found that people tend to contribute reviews and ratings based on their perception of whether they would be helpful or not to others as well as their own personal view of the usefulness of reviews and ratings when buying products. There also seems to be a cost-benefit trade-off that influences people’s decisions to review and rate: people tend to make a decision based on the perceived value of that review or rating to the community against the effort and costs of contributing. A mobile interface was designed that was intended both to reduce the cost of leaving reviews and to increase the perception of the usefulness of the reviews to others. An initial evaluation of this reviewing interface suggests that it could encourage more people to leave reviews.

[1]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  A Two-Iteration Clustering Method to Reveal Unique and Hidden Characteristics of Items Based on Text Reviews , 2015, WWW.

[2]  David A. Schweidel,et al.  Online Product Opinions: Incidence, Evaluation, and Evolution , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[3]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  The design space of opinion measurement interfaces: exploring recall support for rating and ranking , 2012, CHI.

[4]  Sonja Utz,et al.  'Egoboo' vs. altruism: the role of reputation in online consumer communities , 2009, New Media Soc..

[5]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  An empirical study of information contribution to online feedback systems: A motivation perspective , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[7]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Hsien-Tung Tsai,et al.  Reciprocity norms and information-sharing behavior in online consumption communities: An empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[10]  Sergio Picazo-Vela,et al.  Why provide an online review? An extended theory of planned behavior and the role of Big-Five personality traits , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think , 1985, CACM.

[12]  Bin Gu,et al.  An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviors in online investment communities , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Rakhi Thakur.  Customer engagement and online reviews , 2018 .

[14]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews , 2009, CACM.

[15]  Moutusy Maity,et al.  Adolescent's eWOM intentions: An investigation into the roles of peers, the Internet and gender , 2017 .

[16]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[17]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Are user-contributed reviews community property?: exploring the beliefs and practices of reviewers , 2013, WebSci.

[18]  Ainsworth Bailey,et al.  Consumer Awareness and Use of Product Review Websites , 2005 .

[19]  Ji Wu,et al.  Community engagement and online word of mouth: An empirical investigation , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Koji Yatani,et al.  Review spotlight: a user interface for summarizing user-generated reviews using adjective-noun word pairs , 2011, CHI.

[21]  Sangwon Park,et al.  What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. , 2015 .

[22]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  RevMiner: an extractive interface for navigating reviews on a smartphone , 2012, UIST.

[23]  Xin Li,et al.  Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Ya Ping Chang,et al.  Good discounts earn good reviews in return? Effects of price promotion on online restaurant reviews , 2019, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[25]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Understanding the Intention of Information Contribution to Online Feedback Systems from Social Exchange and Motivation Crowding Perspectives , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[26]  Amélie Marian,et al.  Improving the quality of predictions using textual information in online user reviews , 2013, Inf. Syst..

[27]  Abhijit Karnik,et al.  PiVOT: personalized view-overlays for tabletops , 2012, UIST.

[28]  David Godes,et al.  Sequential and Temporal Dynamics of Online Opinion , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Intentions to Use Information Technologies: An Integrative Model , 2006, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[30]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Are Consumers More Likely to Contribute Online Reviews for Hit or Niche Products? , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Victoria D. Bush,et al.  What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2014 .

[32]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference , 2013 .

[33]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[35]  Djoerd Hiemstra,et al.  FedWeb Greatest Hits: Presenting the New Test Collection for Federated Web Search , 2015, WWW.

[36]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Understanding consumers' continuance intention to contribute online reviews , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..