Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence

Flesch, Fog and Lix readability formulas were used to measure 32 randomly selected chairmen′s address and footnote passages from the annual reports of some Hong Kong public companies for the years 1986 and 1991. Examines four issues: temporal change in readability levels, influence of industrial grouping on readability, and the relationship between corporate size or profitability on readability levels. Finds that readability is beyond the fluent comprehension levels of 90 per cent of the adult population, overall readability declined over the five‐year period; industrial classification has insignificant impact, and neither company size nor profitability are associated with improved readability levels. These Asian findings are consistent with those from similar studies in the USA, UK, Canada and New Zealand.

[1]  M. Jones.  Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence ‐ a comment to contexualize , 1996 .

[2]  Richard Taffler,et al.  Readability and Understandability: Different Measures of the Textual Complexity of Accounting Narrative , 1992 .

[3]  R. Taffler,et al.  The Chairman's Statement and Corporate Financial Performance , 1992 .

[4]  William P. Stevens,et al.  Measuring the Readability of Business Writing: The Cloze Procedure Versus Readability Formulas , 1992 .

[5]  M. J. Jones,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman's Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company , 1988 .

[6]  J. Courtis.  Fry, Smog, Lix and Rix: Insinuations About Corporate Business Communications , 1987 .

[7]  J. Courtis,et al.  An Investigation into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk-Return Relationships , 1986 .

[8]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  Accounting Report Readability: The Use of Readability Techniques , 1986 .

[9]  R. Hoskins.  Annual reports I: Difficult reading and getting more so , 1984 .

[10]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  Annual reports II: Readability of reports vs. business press , 1984 .

[11]  Arthur Harris Adelberg,et al.  The Accounting Syntactic Complexity Formula: A New Instrument for Predicting the Readability of Selected Accounting Communications , 1983 .

[12]  Jonathan Anderson.  Lix and Rix: Variations on a Little-Known Readability Index. , 1983 .

[13]  C. Bjornsson.  Readability of Newspapers in 11 Languages. , 1983 .

[14]  Campbell R. McConnell,et al.  Readability Formulas as Applied to College Economics Textbooks. , 1982 .

[15]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  Corporate Annual Reporting: A Mass Communication Perspective , 1982 .

[16]  G. Pound.  A NOTE ON AUDIT REPORT READABILITY , 1981 .

[17]  J. W. Irwin,et al.  Assessing Readability: The Checklist Approach. , 1980 .

[18]  A. H. Adelberg.  Narrative Disclosures Contained in Financial Reports: Means of Communication or Manipulation? , 1979 .

[19]  A. H. Adelberg.  METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF FINANCIAL REPORT MESSAGES , 1979 .

[20]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  The Objectives of Published Accounting Reports , 1974 .

[21]  R. Flesch.  The Art of Readable Writing , 1974 .

[22]  W. Kwolek,et al.  A Readability Survey of Technical and Popular Literature , 1973 .

[23]  M. D. Still.  The Readability of Chairmen's Statements , 1972 .

[24]  R. Gunning.  The Fog Index After Twenty Years , 1969 .

[25]  George R. Klare,et al.  The measurement of readability , 1963 .

[26]  Charles E. Swanson,et al.  Validity of readability formulas. , 1953 .

[27]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Karen Sadowski,et al.  FOGINDEX--A Readability Formula Program for Microcomputers. , 1985 .

[29]  Lois G. Dreyer,et al.  Readability and Responsibility. , 1984 .