Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies

Abstract While the literature analyzing the cross-national determinants of e-government performance reports robust results for structural variables, the level of agreement regarding political factors remains low. Deriving theories from comparative political science, this article hypothesizes how regime type and government capacity determine the global variation in e-government. Methodologically, the paper adds several points to improve accuracy in statistical analyses using the United Nations E-Government Development Index, which have often been afflicted by improper model specifications. Empirically, all seven editions of the index are tested under a common framework in cross-sectional regression analyses, revealing several interdependent trends. While the innovation-friendly environment of democracies was the primary political source of e-government development, autocracies are catching up in order to enhance pro-regime activism on the internet and legitimize their rule by improving economic performance. Government capacity also grows in importance, as e-government programs have become more technologically sophisticated.

[1]  Richard Rose,et al.  A Global Diffusion Model of e-Governance , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[2]  David J. Yates,et al.  Strategy, Competition and Investment: Explaining the Global Divide in E-Government Implementation with Policy Variables , 2011, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[3]  D. West Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .

[4]  Chon-Kyun Kim,et al.  A Cross-national Analysis of Global E-government , 2007 .

[5]  Peter Lorentzen China's Strategic Censorship , 2014 .

[6]  Thomas Barnebeck Andersen,et al.  E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy , 2009, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[7]  Alan Randolph Kluver The Architecture of Control: a Chinese Strategy for e-Governance , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[8]  Sebastian Stier Democracy, autocracy and the news: the impact of regime type on media freedom , 2015 .

[9]  Jan Teorell,et al.  Pathways from Authoritarianism , 2007 .

[10]  Manfred G . Schmidt Legitimation durch Performanz? Zur Output-Legitimität in Autokratien , 2012 .

[11]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  AIS Electronic , 2022 .

[12]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta In 100 Years , 2014 .

[13]  Jay Verkuilen,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy , 2002 .

[14]  A. Bank,et al.  International cooperation of authoritarian regimes: Toward a conceptual framework , 2013 .

[15]  Jan Teorell,et al.  Assessing Alternative Indices of Democracy , 2005 .

[16]  David Collier,et al.  DEMOCRACY AND DICHOTOMIES: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts , 1999 .

[17]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.

[18]  J. Corrales,et al.  Information Technology Adoption and Political Regimes , 2006 .

[19]  Gustav Lidén,et al.  Technology and democracy: validity in measurements of e-democracy , 2015 .

[20]  Margaret E. Roberts,et al.  How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression , 2013, American Political Science Review.

[21]  David J. Yates,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Political Structure, Governance and Public Policy on E-Government , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Shanthi Kalathil,et al.  Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule , 2003 .

[23]  F. Fukuyama What is Governance? , 2013 .

[24]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues , 2010 .

[25]  Ronald Wintrobe,et al.  The political economy of dictatorship , 1998 .

[26]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Why nations fail ? The origins of Power , Prosperity and Poverty , 2015 .

[27]  P. Howard,et al.  The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media , 2011 .

[28]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  What Drives Global E-Governance? An Exploratory Study at a Macro Level , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Kaiju Chang,et al.  Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective , 2011 .

[30]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[31]  Yuan Long,et al.  Factors Impacting E-Government Development , 2009, ICIS.

[32]  Pim Martens,et al.  Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences , 2008 .

[33]  Andrew Whitmore,et al.  A statistical analysis of the construction of the United Nations E-Government Development Index , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Ali Pirannejad,et al.  Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  D. Karpf SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODS IN INTERNET TIME , 2012 .

[36]  M. Weinstein,et al.  The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace , 2004 .

[37]  C. Knutsen Democracy, dictatorship and technological change , 2012 .

[38]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Politics of E-Government: E-Government and the Political Control of Bureaucracy , 2011 .

[39]  S. Heydemann,et al.  Authoritarian Learning and Authoritarian Resilience: Regime Responses to the ‘Arab Awakening’ , 2011 .

[40]  Martin Karlsson,et al.  Carrots and sticks: internet governance in non–democratic regimes , 2013 .

[41]  Baogang He,et al.  Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development , 2011, Perspectives on Politics.

[42]  Ronald J. Deibert,et al.  Liberation vs. Control: The Future of Cyberspace , 2010 .

[43]  Jennifer Bussell,et al.  Explaining Cross-National Variation in Government Adoption of New Technologies , 2011 .

[44]  Aurel Croissant,et al.  Performance and persistence of autocracies in comparison: introducing issues and perspectives , 2013 .

[45]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  Francis Fukuyama,et al.  What Is Governance?: Commentary , 2013 .

[47]  S. Guriev,et al.  Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[48]  L. Diamond,et al.  Liberation technology 1 , 2015 .

[49]  Christian Göbel The Information Dilemma: How ICT Strengthen or Weaken Authoritarian Rule , 2013 .

[50]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Johannes Gerschewski The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes , 2013 .

[52]  Bernhard Kittel,et al.  How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Revisited , 2005 .

[53]  P. Norris Making Democratic Governance Work: How Regimes Shape Prosperity, Welfare, and Peace , 1987 .

[54]  Andreas Schedler,et al.  Democracy's Past and Future: Authoritarianism's Last Line of Defense , 2010 .

[55]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  What facilitates e-government development? A cross-country analysis , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[56]  H. Milner The Digital Divide , 2006 .

[57]  J. Kavanagh Liberation technology , 1989 .

[58]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  Response to Philip N. Howard's review of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom , 2011, Perspectives on Politics.

[59]  Harminder Singh,et al.  Country-Level Determinants of E-Government Maturity , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  S. Greitens Authoritarianism Online: What Can We Learn from Internet Data in Nondemocracies? , 2013, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[61]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[62]  Nele Noesselt,et al.  Microblogs and the Adaptation of the Chinese Party-State's Governance Strategy , 2014 .

[63]  Luis Rodríguez Domínguez,et al.  Determining Factors of E-government Development: A Worldwide National Approach , 2011 .