Specifying Coordination: An Investigation into the Syntax of Dislocation, Extraposition and Parenthesis

Coordination is a syntactic construction with a varying semantics. I argue that besides additive, disjunctive and more specialized kinds of coordination, there is another main type, namely one that can be characterized as specification. Grammatical configurations involving specifying coordination can be found at diverse levels of sentence structure. This provides an new perspective on a range of syntactic phenomena, such as apposition, parenthesis, left- and right-dislocation, and extraposition. Certainly, all these constructions are different, and they have been studied before in isolation - but they also have properties in common. I propose a basic typology in terms of four independent factors: restrictiveness, anchoring, backgrounding, and place of attachment. A common problem for the analysis of non-restrictive material is that it is a priori unclear how to incorporate such phrases and clauses in the host structure, since the syntactic relationship between the two cannot be expressed in terms of regular subordination, which is an automatic result of syntactic merger according to the standard view. Furthermore, several types of phrases or clauses can show up either in a dislocated position or as an intervening parenthesis, which is also unexpected from a traditional perspective. These problems can be solved by means of the particular mode of construal discussed in this chapter, specifying coordination, which is then divided into two kinds: i) restrictive specifying coordination, which can be used to explain extraposition, ii) non-restrictive (parenthetical) specifying coordination, which triggers a secondary message (a proposition if the parenthesis is anchored). Thus, it is shown that superficially very different syntactic constructions make use of the same abstract mechanisms.

[1]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[2]  Simon C. Dik,et al.  Coordination: its implications for the theory of general linguistics , 1968 .

[3]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English , 1973 .

[4]  Robert Wilson Fiengo,et al.  Semantic conditions of surface structure. , 1974 .

[5]  Jean-Roger Vergnaud French relative clauses. , 1974 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .

[7]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure , 1980 .

[8]  H. Altmann,et al.  Formen der "Herausstellung" im Deutschen : Rechtsversetzung, Linksversetzung, freies Thema und verwandte Konstruktionen , 1981 .

[9]  T. Reinhart Pragmatics and Linguistics: an analysis of Sentence Topics , 1981, Philosophica.

[10]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[11]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Coordination and how to distinguish categories , 1985 .

[12]  Arie Sturm Primaire syntactische structuren in het Nederlands , 1986 .

[13]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  The grammaticalization of coordination , 1988 .

[14]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse , 1989 .

[15]  Gabriella Hermon,et al.  Extraposition and the complement principle , 1990 .

[16]  M. Teresa Espinal,et al.  The Representation of Disjunct Constituents. , 1991 .

[17]  de Mark Vries,et al.  On coordination and ellipsis , 1992 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[19]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[20]  C. Zwart,et al.  Dutch is head-initial , 1994 .

[21]  P. Berckmans Demonstration, apposition and direct reference , 1994 .

[22]  K. Pittner Zur Syntax von Parenthesen , 1995 .

[23]  Chris Wilder Rightward Movement as Leftward Deletion , 1996 .

[24]  P. Culicover Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination , 1997 .

[25]  E. Prince On the Limits of Syntax, with reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization , 1998 .

[26]  P. D. Rijkhoek,et al.  On degree phrases and result clauses , 1998 .

[27]  C.J.W. Zwart,et al.  Where is syntax? Syntactic aspects of left dislocation in Dutch and English , 1998 .

[28]  Valentina Bianchi,et al.  Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses , 1999 .

[29]  A. Welschen Duale syntaxis en polaire contractie. Negatief gebonden of-constructies in het Nederlands , 1999 .

[30]  T. V. Wouden Focus on appendices in Dutch , 2000 .

[31]  LEON STASSEN,et al.  AND-languages and WITH-languages , 2000 .

[32]  Carla Schelfhout Intercalations in Dutch , 2000 .

[33]  R. Bhatt The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification , 2002 .

[34]  de Mark Vries,et al.  The Syntax of Relativization , 2002 .

[35]  Parenthesen im gesprochenen Deutsch , 2003 .

[36]  Christopher Potts The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[37]  Andrej L. Malchukov,et al.  Towards a Semantic Typology of Adversative and Contrast Marking , 2004, J. Semant..

[38]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  'Either', 'both' and 'neither' in coordinate structures , 2004 .

[39]  de Mark Vries,et al.  Hoofd-interne relatiefzinnen in het Nederlands , 2004 .

[40]  Ad Neeleman,et al.  Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation , 2004 .

[41]  Werner Frey,et al.  Pragmatic Properties of Certain German and English Left Peripheral Constructions , 2005 .

[42]  L.M.H. Stassen Zero Copula for Predicate Nominals , 2005 .

[43]  Janne Bondi Johannessen,et al.  The syntax of correlative adverbs , 2005 .

[44]  Mark de Vries,et al.  Coordination and Syntactic Hierarchy , 2005 .

[45]  Eros Corazza,et al.  On epithets qua attributive anaphors , 2005, Journal of Linguistics.

[46]  M. Vries,et al.  The Syntax of Appositive Relativization: On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives, and Promotion , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[47]  M. D. Vries Reported direct speech in Dutch , 2006 .

[48]  Norbert Corver,et al.  Comparative Deletion and Subdeletion , 2007 .

[49]  A. Alexiadou Left Dislocation (including CLLD) , 2007 .

[50]  M. Frascarelli,et al.  Types of topics in German and Italian , 2007 .

[51]  H. Heringa,et al.  Appositional constructions: coordination and predication , 2007 .

[52]  M. P. de Vries,et al.  Dislocation and backgrounding , 2007 .

[53]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases , 2007 .

[54]  H. Heringa,et al.  Een semantische classificatie van apposities , 2008 .

[55]  Nicole Dehé Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[56]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach , 2009 .