Geogrid for unsealed forest roads: installation considerations and bearing capacity testing in New Zealand

ABSTRACT This study established 10 field trials on corporate forest roads in New Zealand to demonstrate geogrid installation procedures and test for differences in bearing capacity, hereafter referred to as road strength, for road segments with and without geogrid reinforcement. The primary objective of this research was to determine if thinner aggregate surface layers could be used in conjunction with geogrid reinforcement without significant reductions in road strength. Each trial consisted of three 25-m long road segments randomly configured with the following pavement designs: (1) Control section that consisted of a single aggregate layer overlying a compacted subgrade soil; (2) Geogrid reinforcement that used the same aggregate thickness as the Control; and (3) Geogrid + Reduced Aggregate treatment that used a thinner aggregate layer. Road strength was measured with a Clegg Hammer for the prepared subgrade, finished road surface (i.e. before traffic), and after one winter of log truck traffic. Overall, there were no clear differences in road strength among treatments before or after trafficking. Several factors related to studying operational forest roads are thought to have contributed to this finding, including relatively low traffic volumes (285–1220 loaded trucks) and variability in aggregate thickness within and among sites. Geogrid-reinforced roads may perform better over time and with more traffic. In terms of cost, this finding supports the common practice of simply using thicker aggregate layers to achieve a desired strength as long as aggregate is cheap, local, and readily available.

[1]  F. Jung,et al.  Products , 1968, ADHESION ADHESIVES&SEALANTS.

[2]  J. P. Giroud,et al.  DESIGN OF UNPAVED ROADS AND TRAFFICKED AREAS WITH GEOGRIDS. POLYMER GRID REINFORCEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF A CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY THE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH COUNCIL AND NETLON LTD AND HELD IN LONDON 22-23 MARCH 1984 , 1985 .

[3]  John Sessions,et al.  Forest Road Operations in the Tropics , 2008 .

[4]  Sarah M. Springman,et al.  Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade , 2006 .

[5]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[6]  Jie Han,et al.  Design Method for Geogrid-Reinforced Unpaved Roads. I. Development of Design Method , 2004 .

[7]  Kevin Boston,et al.  Development of a Correlation Model between a 20-kg Clegg Hammer and Field CBR for Measuring Subgrade Strength in Forest Roads in Western Oregon , 2010 .

[8]  J. Giroud,et al.  Geotextile-Reinforced Unpaved Road Design , 1981 .

[9]  Ennio M. Palmeira,et al.  Large scale tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads subjected to surface maintenance , 2010 .

[10]  Kevin Boston,et al.  Compaction of Forest Roads in Northwestern Oregon – Room for Improvement , 2008 .

[11]  M. Peruggia.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[12]  Ralph Haas,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF GRANULAR BASES IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 1988 .

[13]  Rien Visser,et al.  Forest Road Pavement Design in New Zealand , 2009 .

[14]  Hamad I. Al-Abdul Wahhab,et al.  Clegg hammer - California-bearing ratio correlations , 2002 .

[15]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[16]  O. Sigurdsson,et al.  Geosynthetic stabilization of unpaved roads on soft ground : a field evaluation , 1993 .

[17]  Tej S Mathur,et al.  THE USE OF THE CLEGG IMPACT TESTER IN MANAGING AND DESIGNING AGGREGATE-SURFACED ROADS , 1987 .

[18]  S. Fairbrother.  ESTIMATING FOREST ROAD AGGREGATE STRENGTH BY MEASURING FUNDAMENTAL AGGREGATE PROPERTIES , 2011 .

[19]  William Vischer.  Low-Volume Road Flexible Pavement Design with Geogrid-Reinforced Base , 2003 .