Seismic Protection of Monolithic Objects of Art Using a Constrained Oscillating Base

The model of rigid block is well known in literature. In the past, several papers analyzed the behaviour of rigid blocks under different kind of excitations because many monolithic objects of art, such as statues, obelisks and fountains, subject to earthquake excitation, can be modelled as rigid blocks. In [Shenton & Jones, 1991] a general bi-dimensional formulation of the rigid block has been obtained and rocking and slide-rock approximated conditions have been written. More recently this model has been used to describe the behaviour of monolithic bodies subject to base excitations as a one-sine pulse excitation in [Zhang & Makris, 2001; Makris & Black, 2004, Kounadis 2010] and earthquake excitation in [Agbabian et al., 1988; Pompei et al, 1998; Taniguchi, 2002]. Almost all the papers on rigid blocks subject to base excitation focus their attention on symmetric rigid bodies. Only a few papers concern non-symmetric rigid bodies that, usually, represent objects of art better than symmetric rigid blocks. In [Boroscheck & Romo, 2004] the influence of the eccentricity of the centre of mass on the motion of the system has been studied. In [Purvance, 2005; Purvance et al., 2008] an analytical and experimental estimation of overturning events under seismic excitations has been carried out, both for symmetric and non-symmetric rigid bodies. In particular, in [Zhang & Makris, 2001] for a one-sine pulse excitation and in [Purvance, 2005; Purvance et al., 2008] for seismic excitation, the existence of survival regions that lie above the PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration) associated with the first overturning occurrence have been shown. In recent years, methods to reduce the effects of seismic excitation on art objects have been studied in some papers. In [Fujita et al, 2008 ] a critical excitation problem for a rigid block subjected to horizontal and vertical simultaneous base inputs is considered. In [Vestroni & Di Cinto, 2000] a base isolation system has been used to protect statues from seismic effects. The work of art has been modeled through an equivalent elastic beam. In [Calio & Marletta, 2003] the same problem has been analyzed, but the art object has been modeled as a symmetric rigid block simply supported on an oscillating base connected to the ground by a visco-elastic device. The sliding of the body is prevented by special seismic restraints. These analyses have shown the effectiveness of the isolation system and the role of many parameters. To make things more realistic, in [Contento & Di Egidio, 2009], the model presented in [Calio & Marletta, 2003] has been enriched considering also the eccentricity of the centre of mass of the rigid body and the presence of security stops, able to prevent the breaking of the isolation device by limiting

[1]  Tomoyo Taniguchi Rocking behavior of unanchored flat-bottom cylindrical shell tanks under action of horizontal base excitation , 2004 .

[2]  Aik‐Siong Koh,et al.  Free Rocking of Cylindrical Structures , 1990 .

[3]  Alessandro Contento,et al.  Investigations into the benefits of base isolation for non-symmetric rigid blocks , 2009 .

[4]  Milan Batista Steady motion of a rigid disk of finite thickness on a horizontal plane , 2006 .

[5]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Critical cross-correlation function of horizontal and vertical ground motions for uplift of rigid block , 2008 .

[6]  Anthony N. Kounadis,et al.  On the Overturning Instability of a Rectangular Rigid Block Under Ground Excitation~!2009-12-17~!2010-02-01~!2010-07-20~! , 2010 .

[7]  Rubén L. BOROSCHEK,et al.  OVERTURNING CRITERIA FOR NON-ANCHORED NON-SYMMETRIC RIGID BODIES , 2002 .

[8]  Alessandro Contento,et al.  Base isolation of slide-rocking non-symmetric rigid blocks under impulsive and seismic excitations , 2009 .

[9]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Rocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks under Cycloidal Pulses , 2001 .

[10]  Abbas Moustafa Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering - Soil Liquefaction and Seismic Safety of Dams and Monuments , 2012 .

[11]  C. C. Tung Initiation of motion of a free‐standing body to base excitation , 2007 .

[12]  Alessandro Contento,et al.  Seismic response of a non-symmetric rigid block on a constrained oscillating base , 2010 .

[13]  Anna SinopolP,et al.  BASE EXCITATION OF RIGID BODIES. , 1991 .

[14]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations , 2004 .

[15]  Ivo Caliò,et al.  Passive control of the seismic rocking response of art objects , 2003 .

[16]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base , 2012 .

[17]  F. Vestroni,et al.  BASE ISOLATION FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION OF STATUES , 1999 .

[18]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  BASE EXCITATION OF RIGID BODIES. I: FORMULATION , 1991 .

[19]  I. Vardoulakis,et al.  Dynamic motion of a conical frustum over a rough horizontal plane , 2011 .

[20]  Antonio Scalia,et al.  DYNAMICS OF RIGID BLOCK DUE TO HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION , 1998 .

[21]  Tomoyo Taniguchi,et al.  Non‐linear response analyses of rectangular rigid bodies subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motion , 2002 .

[22]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  CRITERIA FOR INITIATION OF SLIDE, ROCK, AND SLIDE-RoCK RIGID-BODY MODES , 1996 .

[23]  James N. Brune,et al.  Freestanding block overturning fragilities: Numerical simulation and experimental validation , 2008 .