New understandings of gender and language classroom research: texts, teacher talk and student talk

While gender has been an ongoing if sometimes peripheral area of interest for researchers and practitioners in language education, conceptualizations of gender itself have developed apace. This means that, unfortunately, gender is at times viewed in an outdated way in language education, resulting in oversimplification and unproductive generalizations. In particular, women and girls are sometimes simplistically represented as victims of gender bias in language textbooks, and of male dominance in the classroom. This picture is far from being the full one, does little, I would argue, to help female students, and may mislead teachers. In this paper I present a rather more complex picture. I illustrate some subtleties and complexities of gender in language education, and suggest some implications of research for educational practice. I also demonstrate alternatives for research into gender and language classrooms, showing both how the more familiar approaches can be fruitfully developed and how researchers can go beyond them. It is important that both researchers working in the area of gender and language education, and teachers in their practice, should be able to engage with considerations of agency, individuality and diversity, while not losing sight of the still-important notions of disadvantage and of gender itself.

[1]  S. Kebede The Relationship Between Uptake and Questioning. , 1999 .

[2]  Reinhold Freudenstein,et al.  The Role of women in foreign-language textbooks : a collection of essays , 1978 .

[3]  Robin Gaff Sex-Stereotyping in Modern Language Teaching--An Aspect of the Hidden Curriculum. , 1982 .

[4]  J. Butler Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[5]  Teacher interaction with individual male and female pupils in junior‐age classrooms , 1985 .

[6]  Sexism in Schools: a new look , 1988 .

[7]  Peter French,et al.  Gender Imbalances in the Primary Classroom: An Interactional Account. , 1984 .

[8]  S. B. Peterson,et al.  Gender Stereotypes in Children's Books: Their Prevalence and Influence on Cognitive and Affective Development. , 1990 .

[9]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an analysis of discourse , 1977 .

[10]  A. Kelly Gender differences in teacher–pupil interactions: a meta-analytic review , 1988 .

[11]  David Graddol,et al.  Gender inequalities in classroom talk , 1988 .

[12]  Chris Weedon Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory , 1987 .

[13]  Karen L. Porreca Sexism in Current ESL Textbooks , 1984 .

[14]  D. Spender Invisible Women: The Schooling Scandal , 1982 .

[15]  Marlis Hellinger,et al.  ‘For men must work, and women must weep’: Sexism in english language textbooks used in German schools , 1980 .

[16]  Stephanie Vandrick,et al.  Exploring Gender: Questions and Implications for English Language Education , 1994 .

[17]  Jane Sunderland,et al.  Girls being quiet: a problem for foreign language classrooms? , 1998 .

[18]  J. Abraham Teacher Ideology and Sex Roles in Curriculum Texts , 1989 .

[19]  M. Coulthard,et al.  Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis , 1992 .

[20]  Jan Hellekant Are multiple-choice tests unfair to girls? , 1994 .

[21]  Elaine Millard,et al.  Differently Literate: Boys, Girls and the Schooling of Literacy , 1997 .

[22]  Madeleine Strong Cincotta Textbooks and Their Influence on Sex-Role Stereotype Formation. , 1978 .

[23]  Elliot L. Judd,et al.  Sexism and TESOL Materials , 1978 .

[24]  S. Poulou Sexism in the Discourse Roles of Textbook Dialogues. , 1997 .

[25]  Jane Sunderland,et al.  Discourse Roles, Gender and Language Textbook Dialogues: Who learns what from John and Sally? , 1997 .

[26]  María Yépez An observation of gender-specific teacher behavior in the ESL classroom , 1994 .

[27]  K. Wheldall,et al.  Teachers’ Use of Praise and Reprimands to Boys and Girls , 1992 .