Mechanism of in vivo activation of the MutLγ-Exo1 complex for meiotic crossover formation

Crossovers generated during the repair of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) are essential for fertility to allow accurate homolog segregation during the first meiotic division. Most crossovers arise through the asymmetric cleavage of double-Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates by the MutLγ endonuclease (Mlh1-Mlh3) and an elusive non-catalytic function of Exo1, and require the Cdc5/PLK1 kinase. Here we show in budding yeast that MutLγ forms a constitutive complex with Exo1, and in meiotic cells transiently contacts the upstream MutSγ (Msh4-Msh5) heterodimer. Once recombination intermediates are committed to the crossover repair pathway, MutLγ-Exo1 associates with sites of DSB hotspots, and Exo1 recruits Cdc5 through a direct interaction that is required for activating MutLγ and crossover formation. Exo1 therefore serves as a non-catalytic matchmaker between Cdc5 and MutLγ. We further show that in vivo, MutLγ associates with the vast majority of DSB hotspots, but at a lower frequency near centromeres, consistent with a strategy to reduce at-risk crossover events in these regions. Our data highlight the tight temporal and spatial control of the activity of this constitutive, potentially harmful, nuclease.

[1]  S. Hilton Coordinator , 2020, Definitions.

[2]  Histone H3 , 2020, Definitions.

[3]  J. Haber,et al.  Network Rewiring of Homologous Recombination Enzymes during Mitotic Proliferation and Meiosis , 2019, Molecular cell.

[4]  V. Borde,et al.  Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis , 2019, Chromosoma.

[5]  A. Marston,et al.  Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis. , 2019, Wellcome open research.

[6]  G. Vader,et al.  Kinetochores, cohesin, and DNA breaks: Controlling meiotic recombination within pericentromeres , 2019, Yeast.

[7]  Xuan Zhu,et al.  Mechanistic view and genetic control of DNA recombination during meiosis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[8]  R. Margueron,et al.  A meiotic XPF–ERCC1-like complex recognizes joint molecule recombination intermediates to promote crossover formation , 2018, Genes & development.

[9]  R. Camerini-Otero,et al.  Extensive sex differences at the initiation of genetic recombination , 2017, Nature.

[10]  A. Villeneuve,et al.  Dynamic Architecture of DNA Repair Complexes and the Synaptonemal Complex at Sites of Meiotic Recombination , 2017, Cell.

[11]  B. Llorente,et al.  Mechanistic view and genetic control of DNA recombination during meiosis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  J. Ortega,et al.  The mismatch repair and meiotic recombination endonuclease Mlh1-Mlh3 is activated by polymer formation and can cleave DNA substrates in trans , 2017, PLoS biology.

[13]  S. Keeney,et al.  Distinct DNA-binding surfaces in the ATPase and linker domains of MutLγ determine its substrate specificities and exert separable functions in meiotic recombination and mismatch repair , 2017, bioRxiv.

[14]  R. Guérois,et al.  Concerted action of the MutLβ heterodimer and Mer3 helicase regulates the global extent of meiotic gene conversion , 2017, eLife.

[15]  P. Cohen,et al.  Control of Meiotic Crossovers: From Double-Strand Break Formation to Designation. , 2016, Annual review of genetics.

[16]  F. V. van Werven,et al.  Temporal Expression of a Master Regulator Drives Synchronous Sporulation in Budding Yeast , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[17]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection , 2016, Science.

[18]  B. de Massy,et al.  A new light on the meiotic DSB catalytic complex. , 2016, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[19]  Mridula Nambiar,et al.  Repression of harmful meiotic recombination in centromeric regions. , 2016, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[20]  Huilin Zhou,et al.  Identification of Putative Mek1 Substrates during Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Quantitative Phosphoproteomics , 2016, PloS one.

[21]  E. Alani,et al.  Roles for mismatch repair family proteins in promoting meiotic crossing over. , 2016, DNA repair.

[22]  José A. Dianes,et al.  2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  S. Keeney,et al.  The kinetochore prevents centromere-proximal crossover recombination during meiosis , 2015, eLife.

[24]  S. Uribe-Carvajal,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial unselective channel behaves as a physiological uncoupling system regulated by Ca2+, Mg2+, phosphate and ATP , 2015, Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes.

[25]  N. Hunter Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[26]  F. Klein,et al.  Transcription dynamically patterns the meiotic chromosome-axis interface , 2015, eLife.

[27]  S. Keeney,et al.  High-Resolution Global Analysis of the Influences of Bas1 and Ino4 Transcription Factors on Meiotic DNA Break Distributions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2015, Genetics.

[28]  R. Kolodner,et al.  Exonuclease 1-dependent and independent mismatch repair. , 2015, DNA repair.

[29]  S. Keeney,et al.  Local and sex-specific biases in crossover vs. noncrossover outcomes at meiotic recombination hot spots in mice , 2015, bioRxiv.

[30]  D. Kachaner,et al.  Understanding the Polo Kinase machine , 2015, Oncogene.

[31]  O. Martin,et al.  Combined fluorescent and electron microscopic imaging unveils the specific properties of two classes of meiotic crossovers , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Keeney,et al.  Temporospatial Coordination of Meiotic DNA Replication and Recombination via DDK Recruitment to Replisomes , 2014, Cell.

[33]  N. Kleckner,et al.  E3 ligase Hei10: a multifaceted structure-based signaling molecule with roles within and beyond meiosis , 2014, Genes & development.

[34]  Xuan Zhu,et al.  Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution , 2014, Nature.

[35]  P. Cejka,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mlh1-Mlh3 Heterodimer Is an Endonuclease That Preferentially Binds to Holliday Junctions* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  A. Guarné,et al.  Mlh1-Mlh3, a Meiotic Crossover and DNA Mismatch Repair Factor, Is a Msh2-Msh3-stimulated Endonuclease* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  F. Klein,et al.  Smc5/6-Mms21 Prevents and Eliminates Inappropriate Recombination Intermediates in Meiosis , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[38]  G. Crouse,et al.  Different Roles of Eukaryotic MutS and MutL Complexes in Repair of Small Insertion and Deletion Loops in Yeast , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[39]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Mammalian Exo1 encodes both structural and catalytic functions that play distinct roles in essential biological processes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Amy C. Kelly,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Prion.

[41]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  Relationship of DNA degradation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Exonuclease 1 and its stimulation by RPA and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to DNA end resection , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Danny E. Miller,et al.  Binding of Drosophila Polo kinase to its regulator Matrimony is noncanonical and involves two separate functional domains , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  B. Gilquin,et al.  Structure of the MutLα C-terminal domain reveals how Mlh1 contributes to Pms1 endonuclease site , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[44]  J. K. Holloway,et al.  RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[45]  V. Borde,et al.  The spatial regulation of meiotic recombination hotspots: are all DSB hotspots crossover hotspots? , 2012, Experimental cell research.

[46]  M. Novatchkova,et al.  The Arabidopsis HEI10 Is a New ZMM Protein Related to Zip3 , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[47]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  A major recombination hotspot in the XqYq pseudoautosomal region gives new insight into processing of human gene conversion events. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[48]  Michael Lichten,et al.  BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[49]  Neil Hunter,et al.  Delineation of Joint Molecule Resolution Pathways in Meiosis Identifies a Crossover-Specific Resolvase , 2012, Cell.

[50]  J. Yates,et al.  Cell cycle phosphorylation of mitotic exit network (MEN) proteins , 2011, Cell cycle.

[51]  S. Keeney,et al.  Exploiting Spore-Autonomous Fluorescent Protein Expression to Quantify Meiotic Chromosome Behaviors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, Genetics.

[52]  S. West,et al.  Regulatory Control of the Resolution of DNA Recombination Intermediates during Meiosis and Mitosis , 2011, Cell.

[53]  K. Shirahige,et al.  Spo11-Accessory Proteins Link Double-Strand Break Sites to the Chromosome Axis in Early Meiotic Recombination , 2011, Cell.

[54]  Xuan Zhu,et al.  A Hierarchical Combination of Factors Shapes the Genome-wide Topography of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Initiation , 2011, Cell.

[55]  Yunmei Ma,et al.  Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[56]  M. Weinreich,et al.  Dbf4 Regulates the Cdc5 Polo-like Kinase through a Distinct Non-canonical Binding Interaction* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  S. Keeney,et al.  Comprehensive, fine-scale dissection of homologous recombination outcomes at a hot spot in mouse meiosis. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[58]  Alain Nicolas,et al.  Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[59]  L. Rasmussen,et al.  Exonuclease I-dependent Mismatch Repair Binding Site of Mlh1 Required for Characterization of a Highly Conserved Supplemental Material , 2008 .

[60]  K. Lilley,et al.  Sequestration of Polo kinase to microtubules by phosphopriming-independent binding to Map205 is relieved by phosphorylation at a CDK site in mitosis. , 2008, Genes & development.

[61]  A. Sourirajan,et al.  Polo-like kinase Cdc5 drives exit from pachytene during budding yeast meiosis. , 2008, Genes & development.

[62]  G. Roeder,et al.  Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[63]  D. Lydall,et al.  Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[64]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast , 2008, Nature.

[65]  K. T. Nishant,et al.  A Mutation in the Putative MLH3 Endonuclease Domain Confers a Defect in Both Mismatch Repair and Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[66]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Direct visualization of asymmetric adenine-nucleotide-induced conformational changes in MutL alpha. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[67]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae MutLα Is a Mismatch Repair Endonuclease* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[68]  M. Lichten,et al.  Mapping Meiotic Single-Strand DNA Reveals a New Landscape of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, PLoS biology.

[69]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  myProMS, a web server for management and validation of mass spectrometry‐based proteomic data , 2007, Proteomics.

[70]  Neil Hunter,et al.  BLM Ortholog, Sgs1, Prevents Aberrant Crossing-over by Suppressing Formation of Multichromatid Joint Molecules , 2007, Cell.

[71]  G. Roeder,et al.  Centromere-Proximal Crossovers Are Associated With Precocious Separation of Sister Chromatids During Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Genetics.

[72]  G. Roeder,et al.  Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis-Promoting Proteins Antagonize the Anti-Crossover Activity of Sgs1 , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[73]  P. Modrich,et al.  Endonucleolytic Function of MutLα in Human Mismatch Repair , 2006, Cell.

[74]  C. Heyting,et al.  The diverse roles of transverse filaments of synaptonemal complexes in meiosis , 2006, Chromosoma.

[75]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Crossover/Noncrossover Differentiation, Synaptonemal Complex Formation, and Regulatory Surveillance at the Leptotene/Zygotene Transition of Meiosis , 2004, Cell.

[76]  Erich A Nigg,et al.  The crystal structure of the human polo‐like kinase‐1 polo box domain and its phospho‐peptide complex , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[77]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  The Molecular Basis for Phosphodependent Substrate Targeting and Regulation of Plks by the Polo-Box Domain , 2003, Cell.

[78]  A. Amon,et al.  Polo Kinase: Meiotic Cell Cycle Coordinator , 2003, Cell cycle.

[79]  K. Benjamin,et al.  Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[80]  L. Johnston,et al.  In Vitro Regulation of Budding Yeast Bfa1/Bub2 GAP Activity by Cdc5* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[81]  A. Amon,et al.  Role of Polo-like Kinase CDC5 in Programming Meiosis I Chromosome Segregation , 2003, Science.

[82]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Inactivation of Exonuclease 1 in mice results in DNA mismatch repair defects, increased cancer susceptibility, and male and female sterility. , 2003, Genes & development.

[83]  S. Santucci-Darmanin,et al.  The DNA mismatch-repair MLH3 protein interacts with MSH4 in meiotic cells, supporting a role for this MutL homolog in mammalian meiotic recombination. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[84]  T. Allers,et al.  Differential Timing and Control of Noncrossover and Crossover Recombination during Meiosis , 2001, Cell.

[85]  N. Kleckner,et al.  The Single-End Invasion An Asymmetric Intermediate at the Double-Strand Break to Double-Holliday Junction Transition of Meiotic Recombination , 2001, Cell.

[86]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[87]  M. Lichten,et al.  Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. , 2000, Science.

[88]  P. Brown,et al.  Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  D. Walpita,et al.  MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[90]  B. Harfe,et al.  Discrete in vivo roles for the MutL homologs Mlh2p and Mlh3p in the removal of frameshift intermediates in budding yeast , 2000, Current Biology.

[91]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  K. Kemphues,et al.  Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. , 1999, Genetics.

[93]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Mutator Phenotypes Conferred by MLH1Overexpression and by Heterozygosity for mlh1Mutations , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[94]  D. Botstein,et al.  The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. , 1998, Science.

[95]  R. Kolodner,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH3 gene functions in MSH3-dependent suppression of frameshift mutations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  R. Erikson,et al.  Mutation of the polo-box disrupts localization and mitotic functions of the mammalian polo kinase Plk. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[97]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[98]  G. Roeder,et al.  Meiotic chromosome morphology and behavior in zip1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1998, Genetics.

[99]  S. Chu,et al.  Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[100]  E. Feingold,et al.  Characterization of susceptible chiasma configurations that increase the risk for maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.

[101]  D. Gordenin,et al.  Hypermutability of homonucleotide runs in mismatch repair and DNA polymerase proofreading yeast mutants , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[102]  R. Hawley,et al.  Spontaneous X chromosome MI and MII nondisjunction events in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes have different recombinational histories , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[103]  L. Xu,et al.  NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[104]  V. Guacci,et al.  Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. , 1992, Science.

[105]  A. Marston,et al.  Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[106]  S. Keeney,et al.  Sequencing Spo11 Oligonucleotides for Mapping Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[107]  S. Keeney,et al.  Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[108]  S. Keeney,et al.  Gel electrophoresis assays for analyzing DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at various spatial resolutions. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[109]  Mike O'Donnell,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae MutLalpha is a mismatch repair endonuclease. , 2007, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[110]  P. Modrich,et al.  Endonucleolytic function of MutLalpha in human mismatch repair. , 2006, Cell.

[111]  Massimo Pandolfo,et al.  Molecular Basis , 2022 .

[112]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.

[113]  S. Raymond,et al.  Gel electrophoresis. , 1962, Clinical chemistry.