Mechanism of in vivo activation of the MutLγ-Exo1 complex for meiotic crossover formation
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Keeney | R. Guérois | F. Klein | Bérangère Lombard | D. Loew | J. Charbonnier | Aurore Sanchez | P. Cejka | V. Borde | Yann Duroc | X. Mu | C. Adam | Lepakshi Ranjha | Felix Rauh
[1] S. Hilton. Coordinator , 2020, Definitions.
[2] Histone H3 , 2020, Definitions.
[3] J. Haber,et al. Network Rewiring of Homologous Recombination Enzymes during Mitotic Proliferation and Meiosis , 2019, Molecular cell.
[4] V. Borde,et al. Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis , 2019, Chromosoma.
[5] A. Marston,et al. Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis. , 2019, Wellcome open research.
[6] G. Vader,et al. Kinetochores, cohesin, and DNA breaks: Controlling meiotic recombination within pericentromeres , 2019, Yeast.
[7] Xuan Zhu,et al. Mechanistic view and genetic control of DNA recombination during meiosis , 2017, bioRxiv.
[8] R. Margueron,et al. A meiotic XPF–ERCC1-like complex recognizes joint molecule recombination intermediates to promote crossover formation , 2018, Genes & development.
[9] R. Camerini-Otero,et al. Extensive sex differences at the initiation of genetic recombination , 2017, Nature.
[10] A. Villeneuve,et al. Dynamic Architecture of DNA Repair Complexes and the Synaptonemal Complex at Sites of Meiotic Recombination , 2017, Cell.
[11] B. Llorente,et al. Mechanistic view and genetic control of DNA recombination during meiosis , 2017, bioRxiv.
[12] J. Ortega,et al. The mismatch repair and meiotic recombination endonuclease Mlh1-Mlh3 is activated by polymer formation and can cleave DNA substrates in trans , 2017, PLoS biology.
[13] S. Keeney,et al. Distinct DNA-binding surfaces in the ATPase and linker domains of MutLγ determine its substrate specificities and exert separable functions in meiotic recombination and mismatch repair , 2017, bioRxiv.
[14] R. Guérois,et al. Concerted action of the MutLβ heterodimer and Mer3 helicase regulates the global extent of meiotic gene conversion , 2017, eLife.
[15] P. Cohen,et al. Control of Meiotic Crossovers: From Double-Strand Break Formation to Designation. , 2016, Annual review of genetics.
[16] F. V. van Werven,et al. Temporal Expression of a Master Regulator Drives Synchronous Sporulation in Budding Yeast , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.
[17] Eleni P. Mimitou,et al. A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection , 2016, Science.
[18] B. de Massy,et al. A new light on the meiotic DSB catalytic complex. , 2016, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[19] Mridula Nambiar,et al. Repression of harmful meiotic recombination in centromeric regions. , 2016, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[20] Huilin Zhou,et al. Identification of Putative Mek1 Substrates during Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Quantitative Phosphoproteomics , 2016, PloS one.
[21] E. Alani,et al. Roles for mismatch repair family proteins in promoting meiotic crossing over. , 2016, DNA repair.
[22] José A. Dianes,et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..
[23] S. Keeney,et al. The kinetochore prevents centromere-proximal crossover recombination during meiosis , 2015, eLife.
[24] S. Uribe-Carvajal,et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial unselective channel behaves as a physiological uncoupling system regulated by Ca2+, Mg2+, phosphate and ATP , 2015, Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes.
[25] N. Hunter. Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[26] F. Klein,et al. Transcription dynamically patterns the meiotic chromosome-axis interface , 2015, eLife.
[27] S. Keeney,et al. High-Resolution Global Analysis of the Influences of Bas1 and Ino4 Transcription Factors on Meiotic DNA Break Distributions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2015, Genetics.
[28] R. Kolodner,et al. Exonuclease 1-dependent and independent mismatch repair. , 2015, DNA repair.
[29] S. Keeney,et al. Local and sex-specific biases in crossover vs. noncrossover outcomes at meiotic recombination hot spots in mice , 2015, bioRxiv.
[30] D. Kachaner,et al. Understanding the Polo Kinase machine , 2015, Oncogene.
[31] O. Martin,et al. Combined fluorescent and electron microscopic imaging unveils the specific properties of two classes of meiotic crossovers , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32] S. Keeney,et al. Temporospatial Coordination of Meiotic DNA Replication and Recombination via DDK Recruitment to Replisomes , 2014, Cell.
[33] N. Kleckner,et al. E3 ligase Hei10: a multifaceted structure-based signaling molecule with roles within and beyond meiosis , 2014, Genes & development.
[34] Xuan Zhu,et al. Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution , 2014, Nature.
[35] P. Cejka,et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mlh1-Mlh3 Heterodimer Is an Endonuclease That Preferentially Binds to Holliday Junctions* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[36] A. Guarné,et al. Mlh1-Mlh3, a Meiotic Crossover and DNA Mismatch Repair Factor, Is a Msh2-Msh3-stimulated Endonuclease* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[37] F. Klein,et al. Smc5/6-Mms21 Prevents and Eliminates Inappropriate Recombination Intermediates in Meiosis , 2013, PLoS genetics.
[38] G. Crouse,et al. Different Roles of Eukaryotic MutS and MutL Complexes in Repair of Small Insertion and Deletion Loops in Yeast , 2013, PLoS genetics.
[39] T. Kunkel,et al. Mammalian Exo1 encodes both structural and catalytic functions that play distinct roles in essential biological processes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] Amy C. Kelly,et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Prion.
[41] S. Kowalczykowski,et al. Relationship of DNA degradation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Exonuclease 1 and its stimulation by RPA and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to DNA end resection , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] Danny E. Miller,et al. Binding of Drosophila Polo kinase to its regulator Matrimony is noncanonical and involves two separate functional domains , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[43] B. Gilquin,et al. Structure of the MutLα C-terminal domain reveals how Mlh1 contributes to Pms1 endonuclease site , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[44] J. K. Holloway,et al. RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis , 2013, Nature Genetics.
[45] V. Borde,et al. The spatial regulation of meiotic recombination hotspots: are all DSB hotspots crossover hotspots? , 2012, Experimental cell research.
[46] M. Novatchkova,et al. The Arabidopsis HEI10 Is a New ZMM Protein Related to Zip3 , 2012, PLoS genetics.
[47] A. Jeffreys,et al. A major recombination hotspot in the XqYq pseudoautosomal region gives new insight into processing of human gene conversion events. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.
[48] Michael Lichten,et al. BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. , 2012, Molecular cell.
[49] Neil Hunter,et al. Delineation of Joint Molecule Resolution Pathways in Meiosis Identifies a Crossover-Specific Resolvase , 2012, Cell.
[50] J. Yates,et al. Cell cycle phosphorylation of mitotic exit network (MEN) proteins , 2011, Cell cycle.
[51] S. Keeney,et al. Exploiting Spore-Autonomous Fluorescent Protein Expression to Quantify Meiotic Chromosome Behaviors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, Genetics.
[52] S. West,et al. Regulatory Control of the Resolution of DNA Recombination Intermediates during Meiosis and Mitosis , 2011, Cell.
[53] K. Shirahige,et al. Spo11-Accessory Proteins Link Double-Strand Break Sites to the Chromosome Axis in Early Meiotic Recombination , 2011, Cell.
[54] Xuan Zhu,et al. A Hierarchical Combination of Factors Shapes the Genome-wide Topography of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Initiation , 2011, Cell.
[55] Yunmei Ma,et al. Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. , 2010, Molecular cell.
[56] M. Weinreich,et al. Dbf4 Regulates the Cdc5 Polo-like Kinase through a Distinct Non-canonical Binding Interaction* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[57] S. Keeney,et al. Comprehensive, fine-scale dissection of homologous recombination outcomes at a hot spot in mouse meiosis. , 2010, Molecular cell.
[58] Alain Nicolas,et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites , 2009, The EMBO journal.
[59] L. Rasmussen,et al. Exonuclease I-dependent Mismatch Repair Binding Site of Mlh1 Required for Characterization of a Highly Conserved Supplemental Material , 2008 .
[60] K. Lilley,et al. Sequestration of Polo kinase to microtubules by phosphopriming-independent binding to Map205 is relieved by phosphorylation at a CDK site in mitosis. , 2008, Genes & development.
[61] A. Sourirajan,et al. Polo-like kinase Cdc5 drives exit from pachytene during budding yeast meiosis. , 2008, Genes & development.
[62] G. Roeder,et al. Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. , 2008, Developmental cell.
[63] D. Lydall,et al. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response , 2008, The EMBO journal.
[64] L. Steinmetz,et al. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast , 2008, Nature.
[65] K. T. Nishant,et al. A Mutation in the Putative MLH3 Endonuclease Domain Confers a Defect in Both Mismatch Repair and Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.
[66] T. Kunkel,et al. Direct visualization of asymmetric adenine-nucleotide-induced conformational changes in MutL alpha. , 2008, Molecular cell.
[67] T. Kunkel,et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MutLα Is a Mismatch Repair Endonuclease* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[68] M. Lichten,et al. Mapping Meiotic Single-Strand DNA Reveals a New Landscape of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, PLoS biology.
[69] Emmanuel Barillot,et al. myProMS, a web server for management and validation of mass spectrometry‐based proteomic data , 2007, Proteomics.
[70] Neil Hunter,et al. BLM Ortholog, Sgs1, Prevents Aberrant Crossing-over by Suppressing Formation of Multichromatid Joint Molecules , 2007, Cell.
[71] G. Roeder,et al. Centromere-Proximal Crossovers Are Associated With Precocious Separation of Sister Chromatids During Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Genetics.
[72] G. Roeder,et al. Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis-Promoting Proteins Antagonize the Anti-Crossover Activity of Sgs1 , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[73] P. Modrich,et al. Endonucleolytic Function of MutLα in Human Mismatch Repair , 2006, Cell.
[74] C. Heyting,et al. The diverse roles of transverse filaments of synaptonemal complexes in meiosis , 2006, Chromosoma.
[75] N. Kleckner,et al. Crossover/Noncrossover Differentiation, Synaptonemal Complex Formation, and Regulatory Surveillance at the Leptotene/Zygotene Transition of Meiosis , 2004, Cell.
[76] Erich A Nigg,et al. The crystal structure of the human polo‐like kinase‐1 polo box domain and its phospho‐peptide complex , 2003, The EMBO journal.
[77] Michael B. Yaffe,et al. The Molecular Basis for Phosphodependent Substrate Targeting and Regulation of Plks by the Polo-Box Domain , 2003, Cell.
[78] A. Amon,et al. Polo Kinase: Meiotic Cell Cycle Coordinator , 2003, Cell cycle.
[79] K. Benjamin,et al. Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.
[80] L. Johnston,et al. In Vitro Regulation of Budding Yeast Bfa1/Bub2 GAP Activity by Cdc5* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[81] A. Amon,et al. Role of Polo-like Kinase CDC5 in Programming Meiosis I Chromosome Segregation , 2003, Science.
[82] T. Kunkel,et al. Inactivation of Exonuclease 1 in mice results in DNA mismatch repair defects, increased cancer susceptibility, and male and female sterility. , 2003, Genes & development.
[83] S. Santucci-Darmanin,et al. The DNA mismatch-repair MLH3 protein interacts with MSH4 in meiotic cells, supporting a role for this MutL homolog in mammalian meiotic recombination. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.
[84] T. Allers,et al. Differential Timing and Control of Noncrossover and Crossover Recombination during Meiosis , 2001, Cell.
[85] N. Kleckner,et al. The Single-End Invasion An Asymmetric Intermediate at the Double-Strand Break to Double-Holliday Junction Transition of Meiotic Recombination , 2001, Cell.
[86] B. Séraphin,et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.
[87] M. Lichten,et al. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. , 2000, Science.
[88] P. Brown,et al. Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[89] D. Walpita,et al. MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[90] B. Harfe,et al. Discrete in vivo roles for the MutL homologs Mlh2p and Mlh3p in the removal of frameshift intermediates in budding yeast , 2000, Current Biology.
[91] N. Kleckner,et al. Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[92] K. Kemphues,et al. Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. , 1999, Genetics.
[93] T. Kunkel,et al. Mutator Phenotypes Conferred by MLH1Overexpression and by Heterozygosity for mlh1Mutations , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[94] D. Botstein,et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. , 1998, Science.
[95] R. Kolodner,et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH3 gene functions in MSH3-dependent suppression of frameshift mutations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[96] R. Erikson,et al. Mutation of the polo-box disrupts localization and mitotic functions of the mammalian polo kinase Plk. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[97] P. Philippsen,et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.
[98] G. Roeder,et al. Meiotic chromosome morphology and behavior in zip1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1998, Genetics.
[99] S. Chu,et al. Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. , 1998, Molecular cell.
[100] E. Feingold,et al. Characterization of susceptible chiasma configurations that increase the risk for maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.
[101] D. Gordenin,et al. Hypermutability of homonucleotide runs in mismatch repair and DNA polymerase proofreading yeast mutants , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.
[102] R. Hawley,et al. Spontaneous X chromosome MI and MII nondisjunction events in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes have different recombinational histories , 1996, Nature Genetics.
[103] L. Xu,et al. NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[104] V. Guacci,et al. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. , 1992, Science.
[105] A. Marston,et al. Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis , 2018, bioRxiv.
[106] S. Keeney,et al. Sequencing Spo11 Oligonucleotides for Mapping Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.
[107] S. Keeney,et al. Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[108] S. Keeney,et al. Gel electrophoresis assays for analyzing DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at various spatial resolutions. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.
[109] Mike O'Donnell,et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MutLalpha is a mismatch repair endonuclease. , 2007, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[110] P. Modrich,et al. Endonucleolytic function of MutLalpha in human mismatch repair. , 2006, Cell.
[111] Massimo Pandolfo,et al. Molecular Basis , 2022 .
[112] N. Kleckner,et al. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.
[113] S. Raymond,et al. Gel electrophoresis. , 1962, Clinical chemistry.