Supervised Interaction - A Form of Contract Management to Create Trust between Agents

Supervised interaction is concerned with the problem of establishing trust between contracting agents in electronic markets. It is designed to put safeguards in place that ensure that errant behaviour in business transactions is either prevented or sanctioned. Supervised Interaction consists of three elements: an organisational framework, a contract specification language and a contract management protocol. The organisational framework emphasises the importance of introducing a trusted third party into any automated business transaction. The normative positions of the agents involved in an automated business transaction are explicitly expressed within the contracts that govern agents' behaviour during supervised interaction. This interaction model is designed to provide the web of trust necessary for successful deployment of agent-mediated electronic markets.

[1]  PachecoOlga,et al.  A Role Based Model for the Normative Specification of Organized Collective Agency and Agents Interaction , 2003 .

[2]  Mark Klein,et al.  Chapter 5 CONTRACTUAL AGENT SOCIETIES Negotiated shared context and social control in open multi-agent systems , 2001 .

[3]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas Sloan Contractual Agent Societies : Negotiated shared context and social control in open multi-agent systems , 2000 .

[4]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[5]  Ingmar Pörn,et al.  The logic of power , 1970 .

[6]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  The role of trust and deception in virtual societies , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  C. Sierra,et al.  Automated Negotiation , 2002 .

[8]  Lars Lindahl,et al.  Position and change , 1977 .

[9]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  The Role of Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[10]  Pablo Cayetano Noriega Blanco-Vigil Agent mediated auctions: the fishmarket metaphor , 1998 .

[11]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept , 1994 .

[12]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce: Scientific and Technological Roadmap , 2001, AgentLink.

[13]  Olga Pacheco,et al.  A Role Based Model for the Normative Specification of Organized Collective Agency and Agents Interaction , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design , 2000, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[15]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations , 1995, ICMAS.

[16]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender systems , 1997, CACM.

[17]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities , 2000, CIA.

[18]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal , 2022 .

[19]  Martin J. Kollingbaum,et al.  Supervised interaction: creating a web of trust for contracting agents in electronic environments , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[20]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  FM96.5 A Java-based Electronic Auction House , 1997, PAAM.

[21]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[22]  Liz Sonenberg,et al.  On social commitment, roles and preferred goals , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[23]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[24]  Chris Reed,et al.  Delegation and Responsibility , 2000, ATAL.

[25]  F. Dignum,et al.  Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: The European AgentLink Perspective , 2001 .

[26]  Marek Sergot,et al.  On the characterization of law and computer systems: the normative systems perspective , 1994 .

[27]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Reaching Agreements Through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Automated negotiation , 1999, CACM.

[29]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing , 1998, J. Log. Comput..