The origin and evolution of LIGO's first gravitational-wave source

LIGO has detected gravitational waves from the coalescence and merger of two massive stellar-origin black holes. The detection is consistent with our earlier predictions that the first LIGO detections from massive binary black hole mergers were imminent, based on isolated binary evolution. Within our classical evolutionary scenario we find that the stellar progenitors of the black holes constituting GW150914 most likely formed in low metallicity environments (Z 400 km/s) for massive black holes are unlikely. Development and survival of the common envelope is likely restricted to evolved stars. While models based on dynamical formation do not predict that the BH spins should be preferentially aligned with the binary angular momentum, our models of isolated BH-BH formation favor aligned BH spins (assuming that the progenitor star spins are aligned when the binaries form). We find that the existence of GW150914 does not require enhanced double black hole formation in dense stellar clusters or via exotic evolutionary channels. Our standard model BH-BH merger rate (200 Gpc^-3 yr^-1) is consistent with the LIGO empirical estimate (2-400 Gpc^-3 yr^-1) and it is 40 times higher than the typical rate of dynamically formed mergers. We predict that BH-BH mergers with total mass of 20-80 Msun are to be detected next.

[1]  Robert W. Taylor,et al.  ASTROPHYSICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGER GW150914 , 2016 .

[2]  Michael Purrer,et al.  Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal , 2015, 1508.07250.

[3]  A. Herrero,et al.  DISCOVERY OF THE MASSIVE OVERCONTACT BINARY VFTS 352: EVIDENCE FOR ENHANCED INTERNAL MIXING , 2015, 1509.08940.

[4]  P. Petitjean,et al.  The origin of dispersion in DLA metallicities. , 2015, 1506.06761.

[5]  S. D. Mink,et al.  MERGER RATES OF DOUBLE NEUTRON STARS AND STELLAR ORIGIN BLACK HOLES: THE IMPACT OF INITIAL CONDITIONS ON BINARY EVOLUTION PREDICTIONS , 2015, 1506.03573.

[6]  Alessandro Bressan,et al.  The mass spectrum of compact remnants from the parsec stellar evolution tracks , 2015, 1505.05201.

[7]  P. Petitjean,et al.  The impact of star formation and gamma-ray burst rates at high redshift on cosmic chemical evolution and reionization , 2014, 1409.2462.

[8]  M. Pinsonneault,et al.  THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE SUN FROM HELIOSEISMIC AND SOLAR NEUTRINO DATA , 2013, 1312.3885.

[9]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Cosmic Star-Formation History , 1996, 1403.0007.

[10]  Harvard-Smithsonian CfA,et al.  Stellar Multiplicity , 2013, 1303.3028.

[11]  Chris L. Fryer,et al.  Common envelope evolution: where we stand and how we can move forward , 2012, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review.

[12]  C. Evans,et al.  Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars , 2012, Science.

[13]  Chris L. Fryer,et al.  MISSING BLACK HOLES UNVEIL THE SUPERNOVA EXPLOSION MECHANISM , 2011, 1110.1635.

[14]  Cambridge,et al.  A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A critical look at variations in extreme environments , 2010, 1001.2965.

[15]  D. Lorimer,et al.  A statistical study of 233 pulsar proper motions , 2005, astro-ph/0504584.

[16]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  The Hubble Higher z Supernova Search: Supernovae to z ≈ 1.6 and Constraints on Type Ia Progenitor Models , 2004, astro-ph/0406546.

[17]  C. Tout,et al.  Comprehensive analytic formulae for stellar evolution as a function of mass and metallicity , 2000, astro-ph/0001295.

[18]  P. Podsiadlowski,et al.  Presupernova Evolution in Massive Interacting Binaries , 1992 .

[19]  B. Schutz Gravitational Radiation , 1989, gr-qc/0003069.

[20]  P. Roberts,et al.  On the Theory of Stellar Winds , 1971 .