Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network

Cells have an internal compass that enables them to move along shallow chemical gradients. As amoeboid cells migrate, signaling events such as Ras and PI3K activation occur spontaneously on pseudopodia. Uniform stimuli trigger a symmetric response, whereupon cells stop and round up; then localized patches of activity appear as cells spread. Finally cells adapt and resume random migration. In contrast, chemotactic gradients continuously direct signaling events to the front of the cell. Local-excitation, global-inhibition (LEGI) and reaction–diffusion models have captured some of these features of chemotaxing cells, but no system has explained the complex response kinetics, sensitivity to shallow gradients, or the role of recently observed propagating waves within the actin cytoskeleton. We report here that Ras and PI3K activation move in phase with the cytoskeleton events and, drawing on all of these observations, propose the LEGI-biased excitable network hypothesis. We formulate a model that simulates most of the behaviors of chemotactic cells: In the absence of stimulation, there are spontaneous spots of activity. Stimulus increments trigger an initial burst of patches followed by localized secondary events. After a few minutes, the system adapts, again displaying random activity. In gradients, the activity patches are directed continuously and selectively toward the chemoattractant, providing an extraordinary degree of amplification. Importantly, by perturbing model parameters, we generate distinct behaviors consistent with known classes of mutants. Our study brings together heretofore diverse observations on spontaneous cytoskeletal activity, signaling responses to temporal stimuli, and spatial gradient sensing into a unified scheme.

[1]  C. Parent,et al.  A cell's sense of direction. , 1999, Science.

[2]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[3]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Selection of gbeta subunits with point mutations that fail to activate specific signaling pathways in vivo: dissecting cellular responses mediated by a heterotrimeric G protein in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  C. Parent,et al.  Ras-mediated activation of the TORC2–PKB pathway is critical for chemotaxis , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  Marc W Kirschner,et al.  An Actin-Based Wave Generator Organizes Cell Motility , 2007, PLoS biology.

[6]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Tumor Suppressor PTEN Mediates Sensing of Chemoattractant Gradients , 2002, Cell.

[7]  A. Nagasaki,et al.  Correlated waves of actin filaments and PIP3 in Dictyostelium cells. , 2008, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[8]  H. Levine,et al.  Transient localized patterns in noise-driven reaction-diffusion systems. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[9]  Richard A. Firtel,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Regulation of 3-Phosphoinositides by PI 3-Kinase and PTEN Mediates Chemotaxis , 2002, Cell.

[10]  M. Meier-Schellersheim,et al.  Quantitative imaging of single live cells reveals spatiotemporal dynamics of multistep signaling events of chemoattractant gradient sensing in Dictyostelium. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  J. Segall,et al.  Cell Motility and Cytoskeletal Regulation in Invasion and Metastasis , 2007, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[12]  Chuan-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[13]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Self-organization of the phosphatidylinositol lipids signaling system for random cell migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  Spatiotemporal Regulation of Ras Activity Provides Directional Sensing , 2008, Current Biology.

[15]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Mobile actin clusters and traveling waves in cells recovering from actin depolymerization. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Natalie Andrew,et al.  Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  W. Rappel,et al.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Biological physics: Harmonies from noise , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Navigating through models of chemotaxis. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[20]  Xiongzhi Chen Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus , 2008 .

[21]  C. Parent,et al.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis at a glance , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  A. Luster,et al.  Chemokines--chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. G. Vicker,et al.  Reaction-diffusion waves of actin filament polymerization/depolymerization in Dictyostelium pseudopodium extension and cell locomotion. , 2000, Biophysical chemistry.

[24]  G. Gerisch Self-organizing actin waves that simulate phagocytic cup structures , 2010, PMC biophysics.

[25]  G. Spiegelman,et al.  Chemoattractant‐induced Ras activation during Dictyostelium aggregation , 2004, EMBO reports.

[26]  Jason M. Haugh,et al.  Quantitative elucidation of a distinct spatial gradient-sensing mechanism in fibroblasts , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  The three-dimensional dynamics of actin waves, a model of cytoskeletal self-organization. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[28]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Two phases of actin polymerization display different dependencies on PI(3,4,5)P3 accumulation and have unique roles during chemotaxis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[29]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Automated characterization of cell shape changes during amoeboid motility by skeletonization , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[30]  J. Norgauer,et al.  Actin polymerization, calcium-transients, and phospholipid metabolism in human neutrophils after stimulation with interleukin-8 and N-formyl peptide. , 1994, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[31]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Differential effects of temperature on cAMP-induced excitation, adaptation, and deadaptation of adenylate and guanylate cyclase in Dictyostelium discoideum , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues , 2009, PloS one.

[33]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Time‐resolved responses to chemoattractant, characteristic of the front and tail of Dictyostelium cells , 2006, FEBS letters.

[34]  S. Zigmond,et al.  Sensory adaptation of leukocytes to chemotactic peptides , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Cyclic 3', 5'-AMP relay in dictyostelium discoideum. IV. Recovery of the cAMP signaling response after adaptation to cAMP , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  R. FitzHugh Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane , 1955 .

[37]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Receptor-Mediated Activation of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins in Living Cells , 2001, Science.

[38]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Ligand-induced phosphorylation of the cAMP receptor from Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  Van Haastert Sensory adaptation of Dictyostelium discoideum cells to chemotactic signals , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  P. Iglesias,et al.  PIP3-Independent Activation of TorC2 and PKB at the Cell's Leading Edge Mediates Chemotaxis , 2008, Current Biology.

[41]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: Distinctions between Directional Sensing and Polarization* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Uniform cAMP stimulation of Dictyostelium cells induces localized patches of signal transduction and pseudopodia. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[43]  T. Meyer,et al.  A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Developmental cell.