LCA benchmarks for residential buildings in Northern Italy and Denmark – learnings from comparing two different contexts

ABSTRACT This study provides LCA reference benchmarks for residential buildings in Northern Italy and Denmark. Furthermore, the benchmark derivation process is analysed to highlight the trade-offs that relate to the methodological choices made by benchmark developers, considering the objectives of the stakeholders. Reference benchmarks for the two contexts are calculated based on national samples of residential buildings. A comparative analysis pinpoints the methodological factors regarding system boundaries, inventory requirements and databases that, from a calculation aspect, affect the benchmarks. Results thus highlight the uniqueness of each benchmarking system put into practice, and emphasize the need for clear calculation rules and transparency within each benchmark system. The identified trade-offs from the derivation process furthermore indicate the inherent need to balance the different interests relating to the stakeholders’ roles when applying the benchmark. The mapping of different trade-offs presented in this study provides benchmark stakeholders with an overview that allows for open discussion about which priorities and choices will fit a specific context of benchmark application.

[1]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  A scenario analysis of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a new residential area , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  IEA EBC Annex 57 ‘Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2eq for Building Construction’ , 2017 .

[3]  Robert Ries,et al.  Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[4]  H. Althaus,et al.  Benchmarks for sustainable construction: A contribution to develop a standard , 2005 .

[5]  Barbara X. Rodriguez,et al.  Benchmarking the Embodied Carbon of Buildings , 2017 .

[6]  John C. Crittenden,et al.  Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Göran Broman,et al.  Sustainability Constraints as System Boundaries: An Approach to Making Life‐Cycle Management Strategic , 2006 .

[8]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Embodied Carbon in Buildings: Measurement, Management, and Mitigation , 2018 .

[9]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[10]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Assessing the environmental performance of buildings: trends, lessons and tensions , 2018 .

[11]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Analysing methodological choices in calculations of embodied energy and GHG emissions from buildings , 2018 .

[12]  Maria de Fátima Morais de Aguiar e Castro,et al.  Development of Benchmarks for Operating Costs and Resources Consumption to be Used in Healthcare Building Sustainability Assessment Methods , 2015 .

[13]  Andrea Campioli,et al.  Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock , 2018, Building and Environment.

[14]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Establishing environmental benchmarks to determine the environmental performance of elementary school buildings using LCA , 2016 .

[15]  Harpa Birgisdottir,et al.  Development of LCAbyg: A National Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Buildings in Denmark , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[16]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Top-down or bottom-up? – How environmental benchmarks can support the design process , 2019, Building and Environment.

[17]  Pradip P. Kalbar,et al.  The absolute environmental performance of buildings , 2017 .

[18]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[19]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Comparison of generic and product-specific Life Cycle Assessment databases: application to construction materials used in building LCA studies , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Natasa Nord,et al.  An overall methodology to define reference values for building sustainability parameters , 2015 .

[21]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the building sector: analytical tools, environmental information and labels , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Harpa Birgisdottir,et al.  Life cycle assessment benchmarks for Danish office buildings , 2018 .

[23]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[25]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment , 2001 .

[26]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes , 2010 .

[27]  Erik Brandt,et al.  Levetider af bygningsdele ved vurdering af bæredygtighed og totaløkonomi , 2013 .

[28]  Andrea Campioli,et al.  Benchmark LCA e uso di EPD nei Green Building Rating System , 2017 .

[29]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy , 2009 .

[30]  Holger König,et al.  Benchmarks for life cycle costs and life cycle assessment of residential buildings , 2012 .

[31]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice , 2017 .

[32]  Tarja Häkkinen Sustainability and performance assessment and benchmarking of buildings: Final report , 2012 .

[33]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  NativeLCA - a systematic approach for the selection of environmental datasets as generic data: application to construction products in a national context , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Impact of progressive sustainable target value assessment on building design decisions , 2015 .

[35]  Alexandra Lebert,et al.  Towards guidance values for the environmental performance of buildings: application to the statistical analysis of 40 low-energy single family houses’ LCA in France , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  Rob Marsh,et al.  LCA profiles for building components: strategies for the early design process , 2016 .

[37]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings , 2013 .

[38]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  E. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis , 2001 .

[40]  Tomas Rydberg,et al.  Everyday Industry—Pragmatic approaches for integrating sustainability into industry decision making , 2017 .