Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow

Significance The flow of water confined in nanopores is significantly different from that of bulk water. Moreover, understanding and controlling the flow of the confined water remains an open question, especially concerning whether the flow capacity of the confined water increases or not compared with that of bulk water. Here, combining a theoretical analysis and data from molecular dynamics simulations and experiments in the literature we develop a simple model for the flow of water confined in nanopores. We find that a contact angle and a nanopore dimension may substantially affect the confined water flow. We also quantitatively explain a controversy over an increase or decrease in flow capacity. Understanding and controlling the flow of water confined in nanopores has tremendous implications in theoretical studies and industrial applications. Here, we propose a simple model for the confined water flow based on the concept of effective slip, which is a linear sum of true slip, depending on a contact angle, and apparent slip, caused by a spatial variation of the confined water viscosity as a function of wettability as well as the nanopore dimension. Results from this model show that the flow capacity of confined water is 10−1∼107 times that calculated by the no-slip Hagen–Poiseuille equation for nanopores with various contact angles and dimensions, in agreement with the majority of 53 different study cases from the literature. This work further sheds light on a controversy over an increase or decrease in flow capacity from molecular dynamics simulations and experiments.

[1]  Shin-Ho Chung,et al.  The effect of hydrophobic and hydrophilic channel walls on the structure and diffusion of water and ions , 1999 .

[2]  X. Zeng,et al.  Wetting and interfacial properties of water nanodroplets in contact with graphene and monolayer boron-nitride sheets. , 2012, ACS nano.

[3]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Reduced water density at hydrophobic surfaces: effect of dissolved gases. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Jean-Louis Barrat,et al.  Influence of wetting properties on hydrodynamic boundary conditions at a fluid/solid interface , 1998 .

[5]  D. Williams,et al.  Shear-dependent boundary slip in an aqueous Newtonian liquid. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[6]  Alessandro Siria,et al.  Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube , 2013, Nature.

[7]  J. Carrasco,et al.  A molecular perspective of water at metal interfaces. , 2012, Nature materials.

[8]  E. Charlaix,et al.  Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[9]  Dominik Horinek,et al.  Interfacial water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces: slip, viscosity, and diffusion. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  Elisa Riedo,et al.  Nanorheology by atomic force microscopy. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  Gleb E. Yakubov,et al.  Dynamic effects on force measurements. I. Viscous drag on the atomic force microscope cantilever , 2001 .

[12]  D. Sholl,et al.  Rapid transport of gases in carbon nanotubes. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[13]  Xinsheng Peng,et al.  Ultrafast Viscous Permeation of Organic Solvents Through Diamond-Like Carbon Nanosheets , 2012, Science.

[14]  Uri Raviv,et al.  Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films , 2001, Nature.

[15]  Shin-Ho Chung,et al.  Salt rejection and water transport through boron nitride nanotubes. , 2009, Small.

[16]  A. Alexiadis,et al.  Self-diffusivity, hydrogen bonding and density of different water models in carbon nanotubes , 2008 .

[17]  Xiyuan Chen,et al.  Self-adaptive strain-relaxation optimization for high-energy lithium storage material through crumpling of graphene , 2014, Nature Communications.

[18]  C. Cottin-Bizonne,et al.  Nanorheology: An investigation of the boundary condition at hydrophobic and hydrophilic interfaces , 2002, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[19]  J. R. Cooper,et al.  The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam , 2008 .

[20]  Derek Y. C. Chan,et al.  The drainage of thin liquid films between solid surfaces , 1985 .

[21]  Weijie Wang,et al.  Atomic Force Microscopy Measurement of Slip on Smooth Hydrophobic Surfaces and Possible Artifacts , 2015 .

[22]  Cécile Cottin-Bizonne,et al.  High friction on a bubble mattress. , 2007, Nature materials.

[23]  Olga I. Vinogradova,et al.  Drainage of a Thin Liquid Film Confined between Hydrophobic Surfaces , 1995 .

[24]  Max Whitby,et al.  Enhanced fluid flow through nanoscale carbon pipes. , 2008, Nano letters.

[25]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Efficient viscosity estimation from molecular dynamics simulation via momentum impulse relaxation , 2000 .

[26]  Commensurability Effects in Viscosity of Nanoconfined Water. , 2016, ACS nano.

[27]  N. Spencer,et al.  Density Fluctuations Under Confinement: When Is a Fluid Not a Fluid? , 2001, Science.

[28]  J. A. Thomas,et al.  Effect of surface wettability on liquid density, structure, and diffusion near a solid surface. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Peter Agre,et al.  Appearance of Water Channels in Xenopus Oocytes Expressing Red Cell CHIP28 Protein , 1992, Science.

[30]  M. Balhoff,et al.  Quantification of bulk solution limits for liquid and interfacial transport in nanoconfinements. , 2015, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[31]  A. Michaelides,et al.  Friction of water on graphene and hexagonal boron nitride from ab initio methods: very different slippage despite very similar interface structures. , 2014, Nano letters.

[32]  Li Zhang,et al.  Fluid structure and transport properties of water inside carbon nanotubes. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  B. Bunker,et al.  Viscous “Interphase” Water Adjacent to Oligo(ethylene glycol)-Terminated Monolayers , 2003 .

[34]  Sarith P. Sathian,et al.  The role of activation energy and reduced viscosity on the enhancement of water flow through carbon nanotubes. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  H. L. Weissberg End Correction for Slow Viscous Flow through Long Tubes , 1962 .

[36]  N. Aluru,et al.  Fast reverse osmosis using boron nitride and carbon nanotubes , 2008 .

[37]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Contact Angles of Water Droplets in Carbon Nanotubes , 2001 .

[38]  Miko Elwenspoek,et al.  Capillary filling speed of water in nanochannels , 2004 .

[39]  Jian Yu Huang,et al.  Nanowire liquid pumps. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[40]  H. Hoang,et al.  Local viscosity of a fluid confined in a narrow pore. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  S. Granick,et al.  Viscosity of interfacial water. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[42]  Heinbuch,et al.  Liquid flow in pores: Slip, no-slip, or multilayer sticking. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[43]  Hongwu W. Zhang,et al.  Prediction of the viscosity of water confined in carbon nanotubes , 2011 .

[44]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Breakdown of fast water transport in graphene oxides. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Confinement-Induced Phase Transitions in Simple Liquids , 1995, Science.

[46]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  P. Tabeling,et al.  Nanofluidics in the Debye layer at hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[48]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Barriers to superfast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes. , 2013, Nano letters.

[49]  F. Ulm,et al.  Subcontinuum mass transport of condensed hydrocarbons in nanoporous media , 2015, Nature Communications.

[50]  Massimo Antognozzi,et al.  Observation of molecular layering in a confined water film and study of the layers viscoelastic properties , 2001 .

[51]  X. Zhu,et al.  Hydrophilicity and the viscosity of interfacial water. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[52]  N. Chopra,et al.  Mass transport through carbon nanotube membranes in three different regimes: ionic diffusion and gas and liquid flow. , 2011, ACS nano.

[53]  Probing the nanohydrodynamics at liquid-solid interfaces using thermal motion. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[54]  B. Hess Determining the shear viscosity of model liquids from molecular dynamics simulations , 2002 .

[55]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Thermodynamic Resistance to Matter Flow at The Interface of a Porous Membrane. , 2016, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[56]  D. Papavassiliou,et al.  Boundary slip and wetting properties of interfaces: correlation of the contact angle with the slip length. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[57]  Hoon Cheol Park,et al.  Direct measurement of slip flows in superhydrophobic microchannels with transverse grooves , 2008 .

[58]  M. Robbins,et al.  Origin of Stick-Slip Motion in Boundary Lubrication , 1990, Science.

[59]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  On the Water−Carbon Interaction for Use in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Graphite and Carbon Nanotubes , 2003 .

[60]  Nancy E. Levinger,et al.  Water in Confinement , 2002, Science.

[61]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Molecularly Thin Liquid Films , 1988, Science.

[62]  Chang-Hwan Choi,et al.  Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[63]  W. Ducker,et al.  No-slip hydrodynamic boundary condition for hydrophilic particles. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[64]  B. D. Todd,et al.  Thermostating highly confined fluids. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[65]  G. I. Barenblatt,et al.  A mathematical model of fluid and gas flow in nanoporous media , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  E. Charlaix,et al.  Boundary slip on smooth hydrophobic surfaces: intrinsic effects and possible artifacts. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[67]  Lydéric Bocquet,et al.  Large Slip Effect at a Nonwetting Fluid-Solid Interface , 1999 .

[68]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  The structure of liquid water at an extended hydrophobic surface , 1984 .

[69]  R. Netz,et al.  Beyond the continuum: how molecular solvent structure affects electrostatics and hydrodynamics at solid-electrolyte interfaces. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[70]  Gary P. Morriss,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Nonequilibrium Liquids , 2008 .

[71]  P. Feibelman Viscosity of Ultrathin Water Films Confined between Aluminol Surfaces of Kaolinite: Ab Initio Simulations , 2013 .

[72]  G. Richmond,et al.  Water at Hydrophobic Surfaces: Weak Hydrogen Bonding and Strong Orientation Effects , 2001, Science.

[73]  B. Ladanyi,et al.  Structure and dynamics of water confined in silica nanopores. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[74]  E. Trizac,et al.  Liquid friction on charged surfaces: from hydrodynamic slippage to electrokinetics. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[75]  John A. Thomas,et al.  Water flow in carbon nanotubes: transition to subcontinuum transport. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[76]  P. Cheng,et al.  Effects of interface wettability on microscale flow by molecular dynamics simulation , 2004 .

[77]  G. Grest,et al.  Viscosity of nanoconfined water between hydroxyl basal surfaces of kaolinite - classical simulation results. , 2013 .

[78]  Yilun Liu,et al.  Water transport inside carbon nanotubes mediated by phonon-induced oscillating friction. , 2015, Nature nanotechnology.

[79]  R. Jackson,et al.  Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  S. Troian,et al.  A general boundary condition for liquid flow at solid surfaces , 1997, Nature.

[81]  Yingchun Liu,et al.  Dynamics and density profile of water in nanotubes as one-dimensional fluid. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[82]  Alessandro Siria,et al.  Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes , 2016, Nature.

[83]  The end of nanochannels , 2011, 1107.3081.

[84]  H. Verweij,et al.  Fast mass transport through carbon nanotube membranes. , 2007, Small.

[85]  Mainak Majumder,et al.  Nanoscale hydrodynamics: Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes , 2005, Nature.

[86]  A. Maali,et al.  Measurement of the slip length of water flow on graphite surface , 2008 .

[87]  Hans-Jürgen Butt,et al.  Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies , 2005 .

[88]  Narayana R Aluru,et al.  Water Transport through Ultrathin Graphene , 2010 .

[89]  S. Granick,et al.  Motions and Relaxations of Confined Liquids , 1991, Science.

[90]  L. Léger,et al.  Friction and Slip at Simple Fluid-Solid Interfaces: The Roles of the Molecular Shape and the Solid-Liquid Interaction , 2005 .

[91]  Haihui Ye,et al.  Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy Study of Water in Carbon Nanopipes , 2004 .

[92]  Nancy E Levinger Chemistry. Water in confinement. , 2002, Science.

[93]  J. Eijkel,et al.  Principles and applications of nanofluidic transport. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[94]  Tai-De Li,et al.  Structured and viscous water in subnanometer gaps , 2007 .

[95]  J. Petravic,et al.  Spatial dependence of viscosity and thermal conductivity through a planar interface. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[96]  F. Rieutord,et al.  Dipole-dependent slip of Newtonian liquids at smooth solid hydrophobic surfaces. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[97]  D. Papavassiliou,et al.  Liquid water can slip on a hydrophilic surface , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[98]  Pietro Asinari,et al.  Scaling behaviour for the water transport in nanoconfined geometries , 2014, Nature Communications.

[99]  R. Netz,et al.  Water slippage versus contact angle: a quasiuniversal relationship. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[100]  P. Matsudaira,et al.  Direct observation of stick-slip movements of water nanodroplets induced by an electron beam , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  N. Quirke,et al.  Fluid flow in carbon nanotubes and nanopipes. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[102]  A. Striolo The mechanism of water diffusion in narrow carbon nanotubes. , 2006, Nano letters.

[103]  I. Grigorieva,et al.  Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak–Tight Graphene-Based Membranes , 2011, Science.

[104]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Very low viscosity at the solid–liquid interface induced by adsorbed C60 monolayers , 1996, Nature.

[105]  Steve Granick,et al.  Slippery questions about complex fluids flowing past solids , 2003, Nature materials.

[106]  François Feuillebois,et al.  Effective slip over superhydrophobic surfaces in thin channels. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[107]  Hongwu W. Zhang,et al.  Size and temperature effects on the viscosity of water inside carbon nanotubes , 2011, Nanoscale research letters.

[108]  J. H. Cushman,et al.  Epitaxy in simple classical fluids in micropores and near-solid surfaces , 1987, Nature.

[109]  P. Renaud,et al.  Transport phenomena in nanofluidics , 2008 .

[110]  Jiaye Su,et al.  Effect of nanochannel dimension on the transport of water molecules. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[111]  Marc Laliberte,et al.  Model for Calculating the Viscosity of Aqueous Solutions , 2007 .

[112]  B. D. Todd,et al.  Slip flow in graphene nanochannels. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[113]  P. Cummings,et al.  Layering Behavior and Axial Phase Equilibria of Pure Water and Water + Carbon Dioxide Inside Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes , 2002 .

[114]  M. Barbosa,et al.  New structural anomaly induced by nanoconfinement. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[115]  John A. Thomas,et al.  Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. , 2008, Nano letters.

[116]  Kenichiro Koga,et al.  Formation of ordered ice nanotubes inside carbon nanotubes , 2001, Nature.

[117]  Lydéric Bocquet,et al.  Low-friction flows of liquid at nanopatterned interfaces , 2003, Nature materials.

[118]  E. Riedo,et al.  The interplay between apparent viscosity and wettability in nanoconfined water , 2013, Nature Communications.

[119]  Haihui Ye,et al.  Observation of Water Confined in Nanometer Channels of Closed Carbon Nanotubes , 2004 .

[120]  Christoph Dellago,et al.  Macroscopically ordered water in nanopores , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[121]  S. Ge,et al.  Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection , 2014, Science.

[122]  Sheng Dai,et al.  Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. , 2015, Nature nanotechnology.

[123]  M. Buehler,et al.  Nonlinear Viscous Water at Nanoporous Two-Dimensional Interfaces Resists High-Speed Flow through Cooperativity. , 2015, Nano letters.

[124]  P. Bruce,et al.  Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices , 2005, Nature materials.

[125]  C. Grigoropoulos,et al.  Fast Mass Transport Through Sub-2-Nanometer Carbon Nanotubes , 2006, Science.

[126]  N. Aluru,et al.  Anomalously Immobilized Water: A New Water Phase Induced by Confinement in Nanotubes , 2003 .

[127]  L. Qu,et al.  Membranes of vertically aligned superlong carbon nanotubes. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[128]  R. A. Sampson,et al.  On Stokes's Current Function , 1891 .

[129]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Seven challenges for nanomedicine. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[130]  Sony Joseph,et al.  Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of water? , 2008, Nano letters.

[131]  Olivier Raccurt,et al.  Nanohydrodynamics: the intrinsic flow boundary condition on smooth surfaces. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[132]  Y. Gogotsi,et al.  Induction and measurement of minute flow rates through nanopipes , 2007 .

[133]  Taewan Kim,et al.  Nanoscale fluid transport: size and rate effects. , 2008, Nano letters.

[134]  K. Koynov,et al.  Direct measurements of hydrophobic slippage using double-focus fluorescence cross-correlation. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[135]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[136]  Palmer Transverse-current autocorrelation-function calculations of the shear viscosity for molecular liquids. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[137]  M. McGrath,et al.  Viscous water meniscus under nanoconfinement. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[138]  A. Zewail,et al.  Observing liquid flow in nanotubes by 4D electron microscopy , 2014, Science.

[139]  J. Carrasco,et al.  A Molecular Perspective of Water at Metal Interfaces , 2012 .