Intelligibility of older talkers on the NU6 test

The stimuli used in laboratory studies on speech perception tend to be produced by younger talkers in ideal conditions. However, talker characteristics are much more variable in the real world, and include changes in speech due to normal aging and changes due to the environment. The first goal of this study was to investigate how the characteristics of older talkers affect listeners on a speech intelligibility test. The second goal was to investigate the extent to which older talkers can improve their intelligibility in a difficult communication situation. Eight healthy older talkers were selected who varied on their natural speech and voice characteristics. Talkers recorded the NU6 test in four conditions: speaking normally in quiet and in babble noise, and speaking as if to a listener with hearing loss in quiet and in babble noise. These recordings formed a new set of test materials that incorporated differences in talker characteristics as well as differences due to the communication environment. Young adult listeners with normal hearing were tested on these recordings in babble noise at -2 dB SNR. Listeners performed better on word recognition when talkers spoke in noise than when talkers spoke in quiet. Speech spoken as if to someone with hearing loss did not lead to better word recognition accuracy than speech spoken normally. Talkers varied on their overall intelligibility, with a range of 18 percentage points between the least and most intelligible talkers. Talkers were able to increase their intelligibility to the same extent when speaking in noise, regardless of their baseline intelligibility. Therefore, the characteristics of older talkers may dictate their baseline intelligibility, but they do not limit the extent to which talkers can increase intelligibility by changing their speech production.

[1]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[2]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[3]  T. Wiley,et al.  Recognition of speech produced in noise. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Zinny S. Bond,et al.  A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech , 1994, Speech Commun..

[5]  Ann R. Bradlow,et al.  Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[6]  Richard H. Wilson,et al.  Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  P. van Lieshout,et al.  Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.