Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli.

Momentary fluctuations of baseline activity have been shown to influence responses to sensory stimulation both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. This suggests that perceptual awareness does not solely arise from physical stimulus properties. Here we studied whether the momentary state of the brain immediately before stimulus presentation indicates how a physically unique but perceptually ambiguous stimulus will be perceived. A complex Necker cube was intermittently presented and subjects indicated whether their perception changed with respect to the preceding presentation. EEG was recorded from 256 channels. The prestimulus brain-state was defined as the spatial configuration of the scalp potential map within the 50 ms before stimulus arrival, representing the sum of all momentary ongoing brain processes. Two maps were found that doubly dissociated perceptual reversals from perceptual stability. For EEG sweeps classified as either map, distributed inverse solutions were computed and statistically compared. This yielded activity confined to a region in right inferior parietal cortex that was significantly more active before a perceptual reversal. In contrast, no significant topographic differences of the evoked potentials elicited by stable vs. reversed Necker cubes were found. This indicates that prestimulus activity in right inferior parietal cortex is associated with the perceptual change.

[1]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection , 2006, Nature.

[4]  G. Gerstein,et al.  Trial-to-Trial Variability and State-Dependent Modulation of Auditory-Evoked Responses in Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  W. Krzanowski,et al.  A Criterion for Determining the Number of Groups in a Data Set Using Sum-of-Squares Clustering , 1988 .

[6]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Classes of Multichannel EEG Microstates in Light and Deep Hypnotic Conditions , 2007, Brain Topography.

[7]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[8]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Visual discrimination performance is related to decreased alpha amplitude but increased phase locking , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  M. Rugg,et al.  Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[12]  C. M. Michel,et al.  Prestimulus EEG microstates influence visual event-related potential microstates in field maps with 47 channels , 2005, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[13]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Brain state-dependent functional hemispheric specialization in men but not in women. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Toshio Inui,et al.  Neural substrates for depth perception of the Necker cube; a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Ahmet Ademoglu,et al.  Alpha activity decreases during the perception of Necker cube reversals: an application of wavelet transform , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Helmut Laufs,et al.  Where the BOLD signal goes when alpha EEG leaves , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  C. Michel,et al.  Electromagnetic Inverse Solutions in Anatomically Constrained Spherical Head Models , 2004, Brain Topography.

[20]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness in a working memory task. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Synchrony dynamics in monkey V1 predict success in visual detection. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Herbert G. Vaughan,et al.  THE NEURAL ORIGINS OF HUMAN EVENT‐RELATED POTENTIALS * , 1980 .

[24]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  C. Gray,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Segregated Processing of Auditory Motion and Auditory Location: An ERP Mapping Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  A. Federspiel,et al.  Motion standstill leads to activation of inferior parietal lobe , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[29]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Subsecond changes of global brain state in illusory multistable motion perception , 2005, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[31]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Ahmet Ademoglu,et al.  Analysis of the electroencephalographic activity during the Necker cube reversals by means of the wavelet transform , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  D Lehmann,et al.  EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  A Grinvald,et al.  Coherent spatiotemporal patterns of ongoing activity revealed by real-time optical imaging coupled with single-unit recording in the cat visual cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  T. Shallice,et al.  Frontal lesions and sustained attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Kung Yao,et al.  Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[40]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Prediction of response speed by anticipatory high‐frequency (gamma band) oscillations in the human brain , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[41]  M Esslen,et al.  Brain areas and time course of emotional processing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[42]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[43]  S. R. Lehky Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Carter Wendelken,et al.  Neurocognitive development of the ability to manipulate information in working memory. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Adaptive segmentation of spontaneous EEG map series into spatially defined microstates. , 1993, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[46]  J. Grafman,et al.  Sustained attention deficits in pat ients with right frontal lesions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—a review , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[48]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Boundary Completion Is Automatic and Dissociable from Shape Discrimination , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Right parietal cortex plays a critical role in change blindness. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  G. Orban,et al.  A Higher Order Motion Region in Human Inferior Parietal Lobule Evidence from fMRI , 2003, Neuron.

[51]  Wolfgang Skrandies,et al.  The Effect of Stimulation Frequency and Retinal Stimulus Location on Visual Evoked Potential Topography , 2007, Brain Topography.

[52]  B. Postle,et al.  Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Steven Lemm,et al.  Now you feel it--now you don't: ERP correlates of somatosensory awareness. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[54]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  Necker cube reversals during long-term EEG recordings: sub-bands of alpha activity. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[55]  Stephanie Clarke,et al.  Automatic and intrinsic auditory "what" and "where" processing in humans revealed by electrical neuroimaging. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Linking spontaneous activity of single cortical neurons and the underlying functional architecture. , 1999, Science.

[57]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes , 2003, Nature.

[58]  Michael Bach,et al.  Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: how interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[59]  Margitta Seeck,et al.  The speed of visual cognition. , 2004, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[60]  E Başar,et al.  Frontal gamma-band enhancement during multistable visual perception. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[61]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Activity in Ventrolateral and Mid-Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex during Nonspatial Visual Working Memory Processing: Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, NeuroImage.

[62]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  T. Ergenoğlu,et al.  Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[64]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[65]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[66]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  C. Michel,et al.  Unraveling the cerebral dynamics of mental imagery , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[68]  C M Michel,et al.  Event-related potential maps depend on prestimulus brain electric microstate map. , 1994, The International journal of neuroscience.

[69]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[70]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[71]  Michael Bach,et al.  Bistable perception -- along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[72]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  Christine Preibisch,et al.  Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Direction Reversals in Ambiguous Apparent Visual Motion , 2001, NeuroImage.

[74]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Unilateral Right Parietal Damage Leads to Bilateral Deficit for High-Level Motion , 2001, Neuron.

[75]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[76]  C M Michel,et al.  Event-related potential map differences depend on the prestimulus microstates. , 1995, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[77]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[78]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Millisecond by Millisecond, Year by Year: Normative EEG Microstates and Developmental Stages , 2002, NeuroImage.

[79]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  A deviant EEG brain microstate in acute, neuroleptic-naive schizophrenics at rest , 1999, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[80]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’ , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[82]  M. Petrides Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  William Gaetz,et al.  Activation of area MT/V5 and the right inferior parietal cortex during the discrimination of transient direction changes in translational motion. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[84]  W. Strik,et al.  EEG signs of vigilance fluctuations preceding perceptual flips in multistable illusionary motion. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[85]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[86]  S. Yantis,et al.  Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.