Incorporating Lower-Bound Capacities into LRFD Codes for Pile Foundations

There is generally a physical limit to the smallest possible capacity for a deep foundation. However, a lower bound on the capacity has rarely been accounted for in performing reliability analyses and developing reliability -based design codes. The objectives of this paper are to (1) investigate the possibility of a lower -bound capacity using pile load test databases; (2) study how a lower -bound capacity could affect the reliability for a pile foundation; and (3) propose a Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) design-checking format that includes information on the lower -bound capacity in addition to the conventional design information. Databases with driven pipe piles show clear evidence for the existence of a lower -bound capacity in both clays and sands. This lower-bound capacity is a physical variable that can be calculated based on mechanics with site-specific soil properties. For driven pipe piles, the calculated lower-bound capacity typically ranges from 0.5 to 0.9 times the calculated predicted capacity. Re liability analyses illustrate that the presence of a lower-bound capacity can have a significant effect on increasing the reliability of a deep foundation. Its effect increases as the coefficient of variation for the capacity increases and as the target re liability index increases. Finally, it is shown that information about the lower-bound capacity can be incorporated into LRFD codes using two alternative formats that would not require substantive changes to existing codes. Incorporation of a lower-bound capacity into design is expected to provide a more realistic quantification of reliability for decision -making purposes and therefore a more rational basis for design.

[1]  C. A. Cornell,et al.  Development of Pile Foundation Bias Factors Using Observed Behavior of Platforms During Hurricane Andrew , 1996 .

[2]  Svein Fjeld,et al.  RELIABILITY OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES , 1978 .

[3]  W. Tang,et al.  RELIABILITY OF AXIALLY LOADED DRIVEN PILE GROUPS , 2001 .

[4]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[5]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  Assessment of current load factors for use in geotechnical load and resistance factor design , 2003 .

[6]  R. G. Bea,et al.  Evaluation of Reliability of Platform Pile Foundations , 1999 .

[7]  Michael McVay,et al.  Calibration of Load and Resistance Factor Design: Resistance Factors for Drilled Shaft Design , 2002 .

[8]  N O Nawari,et al.  Evaluation of Resistance Factors for Driven Piles , 2000 .

[9]  Michael McVay,et al.  Uncertainty in Load and Resistance Factor Design Phi Factors for Driven Prestressed Concrete Piles , 2002 .

[10]  Robert B. Gilbert Reliability-Based Design as a Decision-Making Tool , 2003 .

[11]  Dennis E Becker,et al.  EIGHTEENTH CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL COLLOQUIUM: LIMIT STATES DESIGN FOR FOUNDATIONS. PART II. DEVELOPMENT FOR THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF CANADA , 1996 .

[12]  J. L. Withiam Implementation of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for Substructure Design , 2003 .

[13]  W. H. Tang,et al.  PERFORMANCE RELIABILITY OF OFFSHORE PILES , 1990 .

[14]  George G. Goble Load and Resistance Factor Design of Driven Piles , 1996 .

[15]  Michael McVay,et al.  LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN (LRFD) FOR DRIVEN PILES USING DYNAMIC METHODS-A FLORIDA PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[16]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Load and Resistance Factor Design, Cost, and Risk: Designing a Drilled-Shaft Load Test Program in Florida Limestone , 2003 .

[17]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Development of a reliability-based design framework for transmission line structure foundations , 2003 .

[18]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[19]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  RELIABILITY OF OFFSHORE FOUNDATIONS - STATE OF THE ART , 1989 .

[20]  G Goble,et al.  GEOTECHNICAL RELATED DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN (LRFD) METHODS , 1999 .

[21]  Malcolm D. Bolton LIMIT STATE DESIGN IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING , 1981 .

[22]  M. R. Horanell,et al.  Risk of Foundation Failure of Offshore Jacket Piles , 1996 .

[23]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Case study of offshore pile system reliability , 1993 .

[24]  W. H. Tang,et al.  Model Uncertainty in Offshore Geotechnical Reliability , 1995 .

[25]  Samuel G. Paikowsky,et al.  Practical Lessons Learned from Applying the Reliability Methods to LRFD for the Analysis of Deep Foundations , 2003 .

[26]  J W Pappin,et al.  AN APPROACH TO LIMIT STATE CALCULATIONS IN GEOTECHNICS , 1981 .