Classroom Struggle? Market Oriented Education Reforms and their Impact on the Teacher Labour Process

The reforms introduced through the Education Reform Act 1988 have brought about a radical redistribution of authority in the school system. The reform process includes the introduction of competitive markets, the erosion of the democratic structures that previously underpinned the state school sector, and the centralization of power over both funding and educational issues. This article examines the impact of these changes on the teacher labour process, drawing from recent research in schools in England and from earlier research on schools in the USA. Teacher labour is being transformed in several ways; reduced autonomy, deskilling, work intensification, and increased labour flexibility are identified. Some consideration is given to teacher responses, noting the importance of trade union responses for this traditionally highly organised group of employees.

[1]  R. Seifert,et al.  Industrial Relations in Schools , 1995 .

[2]  J. Smyth.  Devolution and Teachers' Work: The Underside of a Complex Phenomenon , 1995 .

[3]  C. Lloyd,et al.  Restructuring in the NHS: The Impact of the 1990 Reforms on the Management of Labour , 1995 .

[4]  Rosalind Levacic,et al.  Local management of schools , 1995 .

[5]  M. Podgursky,et al.  Education Policy and Teacher Effort , 1995 .

[6]  W. Firestone.  Redesigning Teacher Salary Systems for Educational Reform , 1994 .

[7]  W. Gill.  Decentralisation and devolution in local government: pressures and obstacles , 1994 .

[8]  Tim L. Mazzoni.  4. State policy‐making and school reform: influences and influentials , 1994 .

[9]  Rodney T. Ogawa.  The Institutional Sources of Educational Reform: The Case of School-Based Management , 1994 .

[10]  S. Bach,et al.  Opting Out of Pay Devolution? The Prospects for Local Pay Bargaining in UK Public Services: Reply , 1994 .

[11]  W. Boyd,et al.  Antipolitics, Education, and Institutional Choice: The Flight From Democracy , 1994 .

[12]  Rachel Bailey.  Annual Review Article 1993: British Public Sector Industrial Relations , 1994 .

[13]  R. Levačić,et al.  Senior Management, Classroom Teacher and Governor Responses to Local Management of Schools , 1994 .

[14]  Tim Simkins,et al.  Efficiency, effectiveness and the local management of schools , 1994 .

[15]  Richard G. Hatcher.  Market Relationships and the Management of Teachers , 1994 .

[16]  S. Ball.  Education policy, power relations and teachers’ work , 1993 .

[17]  R. Seifert,et al.  Change in the Teacher Unions , 1993 .

[18]  R. Levačić.  Local management of schools as an organizational form: theory and application , 1993 .

[19]  J. Evetts.  LMS and headship: changing the contexts for micro-politics , 1993 .

[20]  Lynn Jones,et al.  Education, Competence and the Control of Expertise , 1993 .

[21]  S. Ball.  Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: the market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA , 1993 .

[22]  R. Seifert.  Industrial Relations in the Nhs , 1992 .

[23]  A. Ferner,et al.  Privatization, Regulation and Industrial Relations , 1991 .

[24]  B. Simon.  Education and the Social Order: 1940-1990 , 1991 .

[25]  I. Kessler.  Workplace Industrial Relations in Local Government , 1991 .

[26]  D. Hellawell.  Some Effects of the National Dispute on the Relationships between Head Teachers and School Staffs in Primary Schools , 1990 .

[27]  Catherine Hakim,et al.  Core and Periphery in Employers' Workforce Strategies: Evidence from the 1987 E.L.U.S. Survey , 1990 .

[28]  Dennis Carlson.  Teachers as Political Actors: From Reproductive Theory to the Crisis of Schooling , 1987 .

[29]  R. Seifert.  Teacher militancy : a history of teacher strikes, 1896-1987 , 1987 .

[30]  Susan Johnson.  Teacher unions in schools , 1984 .