Learning-by-doing and the sources of productivity growth: A dynamic model with application to U.S. agriculture

The significance of learning to productivity growth is formulated within a dynamic adjustment-cost framework. Explicitly treating the acquisition of knowledge as a firm-specific capital good entering the production function along with other conventional inputs, the dynamic optimization model integrates the learning-by-doing hypothesis with technical change, scale, and disequilibrium input use effects in the aggregate productivity analysis. The theoretical framework is applied to examining the dynamic components accounting for the growth of U.S. production agriculture over the 1950–82 period. The results imply a less important role for technical change and assign a substantial role to the previously unmeasured contribution of learning-by-doing to the growth of aggregate agriculture industry.

[1]  S. Stefanou.  Learning, experience, and firm size , 1989 .

[2]  Dale W. Jorgenson.  Productivity and Economic Growth in Japan and the United States , 1988 .

[3]  R. Pindyck,et al.  The Learning Curve and Optimal Production Under Uncertainty , 1987 .

[4]  W. Oi.  The Neoclassical Foundations of Progress Functions , 1967 .

[5]  Z. Griliches,et al.  The Explanation of Productivity Change , 1967 .

[6]  M. Leblanc,et al.  The Effects of Tax Policy on Aggregate Agricultural Investment , 1986 .

[7]  C. Hulten.  Technical Change and the Reproducibility of Capital , 1975 .

[8]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  The Multivariate Flexible Accelerator Model: Its Empirical Restrictions and an Application to U.S. Manufacturing , 1983 .

[9]  Eytan Sheshinski,et al.  Tests of the "Learning by Doing" Hypothesis , 1967 .

[10]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[11]  Larry G. Epstein.  Duality Theory and Functional Forms for Dynamic Factor Demands , 1981 .

[12]  Timothy M. Devinney,et al.  Entry and Learning , 1987 .

[13]  C. Shumway,et al.  Dynamic Adjustment in the U.S. Dairy Industry , 1988 .

[14]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  U.S. Real Product and Real Factor Input, 1929-1967 , 1970 .

[15]  C. Hulten.  On the "Importance" of Productivity Change , 1979 .

[16]  Spiro E. Stefanou,et al.  Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture under Dynamic Adjustment , 1991 .

[17]  V. E. Ball,et al.  A dynamic adjustment model for U.S. agriculture: 1948–79☆ , 1988 .

[18]  R. Solow.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[19]  S. Rosen.  Learning by Experience as Joint Production , 1972 .

[20]  Michael R. Caputo.  Comparative Dynamics via Envelope Methods in Variational Calculus , 1990 .

[21]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[22]  S. Capalbo.  MEASURING THE COMPONENTS OF AGGREGATE PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN U.S. AGRICULTURE , 1988 .

[23]  Arthur B Treadway,et al.  Adjustment costs and variable inputs in the theory of the competitive firm , 1970 .

[24]  R. Chambers,et al.  Investment in U.S. Agriculture , 1986 .

[25]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Aggregate Investment and Consistent Intertemporal Technologies , 1982 .

[27]  T. Taylor,et al.  Dynamic Factor Demands for Aggregate Southeastern United States Agriculture , 1985, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[28]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Tax Policy and Investment Behavior , 1967 .

[29]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  Optimal production with learning by doing , 1983 .

[30]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[31]  Julio J. Rotemberg,et al.  Dynamic Factor Demands and the Effects of Energy Price Shocks , 1983 .

[32]  V. E. Ball,et al.  Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement in U.S. Agriculture 1948–79 , 1985 .

[33]  S. Fabricant.  Basic facts on productivity change , 1959 .