Intracranial aneurysm segmentation in 3D CT angiography: method and quantitative validation

Accurately quantifying aneurysm shape parameters is of clinical importance, as it is an important factor in choosing the right treatment modality (i.e. coiling or clipping), in predicting rupture risk and operative risk and for pre-surgical planning. The first step in aneurysm quantification is to segment it from other structures that are present in the image. As manual segmentation is a tedious procedure and prone to inter- and intra-observer variability, there is a need for an automated method which is accurate and reproducible. In this paper a novel semi-automated method for segmenting aneurysms in Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) data based on Geodesic Active Contours is presented and quantitatively evaluated. Three different image features are used to steer the level set to the boundary of the aneurysm, namely intensity, gradient magnitude and variance in intensity. The method requires minimum user interaction, i.e. clicking a single seed point inside the aneurysm which is used to estimate the vessel intensity distribution and to initialize the level set. The results show that the developed method is reproducible, and performs in the range of interobserver variability in terms of accuracy.

[1]  J. Sayre,et al.  Anatomical and morphological factors correlating with rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients referred for endovascular treatment , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[2]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Non-parametric geodesic active regions: Method and evaluation for cerebral aneurysms segmentation in 3DRA and CTA , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  B. Bendok,et al.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and the assessment of rupture risk based on anatomical and morphological factors: sifting through the sands of data. , 2009, Neurosurgical focus.

[4]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  V. Seifert,et al.  Size and location of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms measured by 3-dimensional rotational angiography. , 2006, Surgical neurology.

[7]  W. Schievink,et al.  Intracranial aneurysms. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Max W. K. Law,et al.  Vessel and Intracranial Aneurysm Segmentation Using Multi-range Filters and Local Variances , 2007, MICCAI.

[9]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods , 1999 .

[10]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Level set based cerebral vasculature segmentation and diameter quantification in CT angiography , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  L. Jou,et al.  Growth rate and rupture rate of unruptured intracranial aneurysms : a population approach , 2009 .

[12]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  Size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. , 2009, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[13]  Sujan Dhar,et al.  INFLUENCE OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM‐TO‐PARENT VESSEL SIZE RATIO ON HEMODYNAMICS AND IMPLICATION FOR RUPTURE: RESULTS FROM A VIRTUAL EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[14]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Morphological Characterization of Intracranial Aneurysms Using 3-D Moment Invariants , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Birgitta K. Velthuis,et al.  Configuration of the circle of Willis, direction of flow, and shape of the aneurysm as risk factors for rupture of intracranial aneurysms , 2009, Journal of Neurology.

[16]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Y Hoi,et al.  An objective approach to digital removal of saccular aneurysms: technique and applications. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.