Biomarker analysis by fluorokine multianalyte profiling distinguishes patients requiring intervention from patients with long-term quiescent coronary artery disease: a potential approach to identify atherosclerotic disease progression.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Furie,et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.
[2] J. Egido,et al. Inflammatory biomarkers in stable atherosclerosis. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.
[3] Dan M. Roden,et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines , 2006 .
[4] P. Barter,et al. The rationale for using apoA‐I as a clinical marker of cardiovascular risk , 2006, Journal of internal medicine.
[5] K. Shimada,et al. Comparison of levels of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with acute myocardial infarction versus unstable angina pectoris versus stable angina pectoris. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.
[6] G. Keren,et al. Circulating matrix metalloproteinase-2 but not matrix metalloproteinase-3, matrix metalloproteinase-9, or tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 predicts outcome in patients with congestive heart failure. , 2005, American heart journal.
[7] D. Brieger,et al. Elevated circulating levels of matrix metalloproteinase‐9 and ‐2 in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease , 2005, Internal medicine journal.
[8] Leong L Ng,et al. Plasma MMP-9 and MMP-2 following acute myocardial infarction in man: correlation with echocardiographic and neurohumoral parameters of left ventricular dysfunction. , 2004, Journal of cardiac failure.
[9] Paul M. Ridker,et al. Inflammation as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor , 2004, Circulation.
[10] Antonio Colombo,et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. , 2003, Circulation.
[11] E. Boerwinkle,et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. , 2003, Circulation.
[12] F. Ceci,et al. Serum Metalloproteinase 9 Levels in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Novel Marker of Inflammation , 2003, Journal of Investigative Medicine.
[13] D. Kereiakes. The Emperor's clothes: in search of the vulnerable plaque. , 2003, Circulation.
[14] V. Fuster,et al. Pathogenetic concepts of acute coronary syndromes. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[15] P. Shah,et al. Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] A. Naylor,et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and atherosclerotic plaque instability , 2002, The British journal of surgery.
[17] Renu Virmani,et al. Healed Plaque Ruptures and Sudden Coronary Death: Evidence That Subclinical Rupture Has a Role in Plaque Progression , 2001, Circulation.
[18] D. Vignali. Multiplexed particle-based flow cytometric assays. , 2000, Journal of immunological methods.
[19] T. Ueno,et al. Peripheral blood levels of matrix metalloproteases-2 and -9 are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[20] G. Thompson. Angiographic evidence for the role of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in progression of coronary artery disease. , 1998, European heart journal.
[21] C. Sing,et al. Effects of polymorphisms in apolipoproteins E, A-IV, and H on quantitative traits related to risk for cardiovascular disease. , 1991, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.
[22] J V Castell,et al. Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.