Universal Temporal Profile of Replication Origin Activation in Eukaryotes

Although replication proteins are conserved among eukaryotes, the sequence requirements for replication initiation differ between species. In all species, however, replication origins fire asynchronously throughout S phase. The temporal program of origin firing is reproducible in cell populations but largely probabilistic at the single-cell level. The mechanisms and the significance of this program are unclear. Replication timing has been correlated with gene activity in metazoans but not in yeast. One potential role for a temporal regulation of origin firing is to minimize fluctuations in replication end time and avoid persistence of unreplicated DNA in mitosis. Here, we have extracted the population-averaged temporal profiles of replication initiation rates for S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, D. melanogaster, X. laevis and H. sapiens from genome-wide replication timing and DNA combing data. All the profiles have a strikingly similar shape, increasing during the first half of S phase then decreasing before its end. A previously proposed minimal model of stochastic initiation modulated by accumulation of a recyclable, limiting replication-fork factor and fork-promoted initiation of new origins, quantitatively described the observed profiles without requiring new implementations. The selective pressure for timely completion of genome replication and optimal usage of replication proteins that must be imported into the cell nucleus can explain the generic shape of the profiles. We have identified a universal behavior of eukaryotic replication initiation that transcends the mechanisms of origin specification. The population-averaged efficiency of replication origin usage changes during S phase in a strikingly similar manner in a highly diverse set of eukaryotes. The quantitative model previously proposed for origin activation in X. laevis can be generalized to explain this evolutionary conservation.

[1]  A Bensimon,et al.  Replication fork density increases during DNA synthesis in X. laevis egg extracts. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  N. Rhind,et al.  DNA replication timing: random thoughts about origin firing , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  K. Marheineke,et al.  DNA replication timing is deterministic at the level of chromosomal domains but stochastic at the level of replicons in Xenopus egg extracts , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  F. Della Seta,et al.  Hierarchy of S-Phase-Promoting Factors: Yeast Dbf4-Cdc7 Kinase Requires Prior S-Phase Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activation , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[5]  David Collingwood,et al.  Replication in Hydroxyurea: It's a Matter of Time , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  David M MacAlpine,et al.  Coordination of replication and transcription along a Drosophila chromosome. , 2004, Genes & development.

[7]  J. Hamlin,et al.  A revisionist replicon model for higher eukaryotic genomes , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[8]  R. Chuang,et al.  DNA replication origins in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  John Herrick,et al.  Kinetic model of DNA replication in eukaryotic organisms. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. , 2001, Science.

[11]  Grigoriy E. Pinchuk,et al.  Stochastic hybrid modeling of DNA replication across a complete genome , 2009 .

[12]  Ian Dunham,et al.  Replication Timing of Human Chromosome 6 , 2005, Cell cycle.

[13]  O. Hyrien,et al.  Mechanisms ensuring rapid and complete DNA replication despite random initiation in Xenopus early embryos. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Reconstructing DNA replication kinetics from small DNA fragments. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Suresh Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Curve Matching, Time Warping, and Light Fields: New Algorithms for Computing Similarity between Curves , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[16]  John Bechhoefer,et al.  Control of DNA replication by anomalous reaction-diffusion kinetics. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[17]  David Collingwood,et al.  The Temporal Program of Chromosome Replication: Genomewide Replication in clb5Δ Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[18]  Dirk Schübeler,et al.  A question of timing: emerging links between transcription and replication. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[19]  Zhifeng Shao,et al.  DNA combing reveals intrinsic temporal disorder in the replication of yeast chromosome VI. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Olivier Hyrien,et al.  Paradoxes of eukaryotic DNA replication: MCM proteins and the random completion problem , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[21]  J. Walter,et al.  Regulated chromosomal DNA replication in the absence of a nucleus. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[22]  Adam P. Rosebrock,et al.  The Hsk1(Cdc7) replication kinase regulates origin efficiency. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[23]  O. Hyrien,et al.  Aphidicolin Triggers a Block to Replication Origin Firing inXenopus Egg Extracts* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Aaron Bensimon,et al.  DNA replication origins fire stochastically in fission yeast. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  Jürg Bähler,et al.  Genome‐wide characterization of fission yeast DNA replication origins , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Edison T. Liu,et al.  Global Profiling of DNA Replication Timing and Efficiency Reveals that Efficient Replication/Firing Occurs Late during S-Phase in S. pombe , 2007, PloS one.

[27]  R A Laskey,et al.  Chromosome replication in early development of Xenopus laevis. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[28]  David M. Gilbert,et al.  In search of the holy replicator , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  J. Blow,et al.  DNA replication initiates at multiple sites on plasmid DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  M. Méchali,et al.  Chromosomal replication initiates and terminates at random sequences but at regular intervals in the ribosomal DNA of Xenopus early embryos. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[31]  Olivier Hyrien,et al.  A Dynamic Stochastic Model for DNA Replication Initiation in Early Embryos , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  M. Méchali,et al.  Cdk1 and Cdk2 activity levels determine the efficiency of replication origin firing in Xenopus , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[33]  K. Marheineke,et al.  Control of Replication Origin Density and Firing Time in Xenopus Egg Extracts , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Owen T McCann,et al.  Replication timing of the human genome. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[35]  John Bechhoefer,et al.  How Xenopus laevis replicates DNA reliably even though its origins of replication are located and initiated stochastically. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[36]  M. Méchali,et al.  Plasmid replication in Xenopus eggs and egg extracts: a 2D gel electrophoretic analysis. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  Matteo Barberis,et al.  A model for the spatiotemporal organization of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[38]  J. Hamlin,et al.  Chromatin decondensation in S-phase involves recruitment of Cdk2 by Cdc45 and histone H1 phosphorylation , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  Scott Cheng‐Hsin Yang,et al.  How Xenopus laevis embryos replicate reliably: investigating the random-completion problem. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.