Geometrical characterization of urban fill by integrating the multi‐receiver electromagnetic induction method and electrical resistivity tomography: A case study in Poitiers, France

A geophysical survey including electromagnetic induction (EMI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) methods was applied and assessed with a 40‐trench sampling grid to delineate the geometry of an urban fill layer. Classical investigation techniques, such as excavation, offer localized information and suffer from time and budget constraints for environmental assessments. Near‐surface geophysics can provide the required spatial sampling to evaluate the coverage of anthropogenic soils in a time‐effective and quasi‐continuous manner. Fast‐acquisition and high‐spatial‐coverage EMI mapping and high‐vertical‐resolution ERT were implemented to delineate a suspicious urban fill on a 5‐ha site in a suburban region, which will host the buildings of a commercial complex. The ERT data and 40 trench excavations revealed an urban fill thickness ranging from 0.4 to 3.6 m overlying a calcareous substratum. After ERT–EMI calibration, a two‐layer model was introduced into the one‐dimensional (1‐D) inversion of the EMI data for estimating the geometry of the urban fill layer across the study site. The EMI 1‐D inversion results indicated that the predicted urban fill thicknesses were consistent with 70% of the measured values (27 out of 40 excavation sites). Resistive ground, large 3‐D structures and the heterogeneity of urban fill affected the EMI and ERT measurements and increased the difficulty of estimating its spatial distribution. In this paper, we present a measurement protocol that can guide land‐use development and be reproduced to investigate brownfield sites. HIGHLIGHTS: Urban soils are poorly characterized by localized investigations for environmental assessments. Spatial EMI data from an urban fill context were calibrated by ERT for thickness inversion. The ERT–EMI inversion reconstructed the urban fill thickness for 70% of the excavation points. Geophysical techniques can reduce uncertainties for site rehabilitation and land‐use development.

[1]  Olivier Kaufmann,et al.  Improving the delineation of hydrocarbon-impacted soils and water through induced polarization (IP) tomographies: a field study at an industrial waste land. , 2012, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[2]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Applying FDEM, ERT and GPR at a site with soil contamination: A case study , 2015 .

[3]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications , 1987 .

[4]  Fayçal Rejiba,et al.  Multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction survey for paleochannel internal structure imaging: a case study in the alluvial plain of the River Seine, France , 2017 .

[5]  Roger Guérin,et al.  Interpretation of slingram conductivity mapping in near-surface geophysics: using a single parameter fitting with 1D model1 , 1996 .

[6]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography , 2010 .

[7]  A. Christiansen,et al.  A global measure for depth of investigation , 2012 .

[8]  David Beamish,et al.  Low induction number, ground conductivity meters: A correction procedure in the absence of magnetic effects , 2011 .

[9]  Mohammad M. Islam,et al.  Depth slicing of multi-receiver EMI measurements to enhance the delineation of contrasting subsoil features , 2012 .

[10]  R. Webster,et al.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[11]  Samuël Delefortrie,et al.  Combining multi‐receiver electromagnetic induction and stepped frequency ground penetrating radar for industrial site investigation , 2015 .

[12]  M. Chouteau,et al.  Geophysical characterization of contaminated urban fills , 2010 .

[13]  Esben Auken,et al.  Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data , 2004 .

[14]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review . , 2005 .

[15]  Oliver Kuras,et al.  Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method , 2013 .

[16]  Julien Thiesson,et al.  Calibration of frequency-domain electromagnetic devices used in near-surface surveying , 2014 .

[17]  R. Barker,et al.  Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections , 1995 .

[18]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation , 2003 .

[19]  Fayçal Rejiba,et al.  1D single-site and laterally constrained inversion of multifrequency and multicomponent ground-based electromagnetic induction data — Application to the investigation of a near-surface clayey overburden , 2012 .

[20]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Three‐dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large‐scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data , 2014 .

[21]  D. T. Lee,et al.  Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation , 1980, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[22]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Estimation of soil salinity in a drip irrigation system by using joint inversion of multicoil electromagnetic induction measurements , 2015 .

[23]  E. Carbonell,et al.  2D and 3D ERT imaging for identifying karst morphologies in the archaeological sites of Gran Dolina and Galería Complex (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain) , 2017 .

[24]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[25]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Quantitative Two‐Layer Conductivity Inversion of Multi‐Configuration Electromagnetic Induction Measurements , 2011 .

[26]  L. S. Edwards,et al.  A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP , 1977 .

[27]  Ty P. A. Ferré,et al.  Three-dimensional sensitivity distribution and sample volume of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments , 2012 .

[28]  Philippe De Smedt,et al.  Exploring the potential of multi-receiver EMI survey for geoarchaeological prospection: A 90 ha dataset , 2013 .

[29]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys , 1999 .

[30]  N. Desassis,et al.  Automatic Variogram Modeling by Iterative Least Squares: Univariate and Multivariate Cases , 2013, Mathematical Geosciences.

[31]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[32]  M. Schmutz,et al.  Mapping of contaminant plumes with geoelectrical methods. A case study in urban context , 2011 .

[33]  Fernando A. Monteiro Santos,et al.  1-D laterally constrained inversion of EM34 profiling data , 2004 .