CO2 emissions of China's food industry: an input–output approach

In a joint U.S.–China statement on climate change, the Chinese government declared to peak CO2 emissions around 2030. This demonstrates the government's determination to deal with carbon emission and climate change. Although the food industry is not a carbon emission-intensive industry, its large scale makes the emission reduction in the industry very important. Based on the input–output structural decomposition method, this paper calculates the CO2 emissions of China's food industry from 1991 to 2012, and decomposes the change in CO2 emissions of the industry during 1992–1997, 1997–2002, 2002–2007 and 2007–2010 into four main effects: emission factor, energy structure, energy intensity, and total output (including four sub-effects: intermediate use, domestic final demand, import substitution and export extension). The results show that changes in CO2 emissions in the food industry mainly depends on total output effect and energy intensity effect. Energy intensity effect is the most important factor reducing CO2 emissions, as it reduced cumulative 213 million tons (Mt) CO2 emissions of the industry. Among total output effect, the effects of intermediate use and domestic final demand are the two biggest contributors to carbon emissions. Finally, we provide some policy advices for constraining and reducing CO2 emissions of China's food industry. The advices include increasing R&D investment and the substitution of energy with other input factors to decrease energy intensity, increasing the added value of the food industry, optimizing the energy structure with more clean and low-carbon energy, and maintaining the prices of raw materials of the food industry (i.e. agricultural products) with taxes or subsidies.

[1]  D. Whittaker,et al.  A Course in Functional Analysis , 1991, The Mathematical Gazette.

[2]  Chia-Yon Chen,et al.  Sources of change in industrial electricity use in the Taiwan economy, 1976-1986 , 1994 .

[3]  Adam Rose,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy: A Structural Decomposition Analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Sue J. Lin,et al.  Structural decomposition of industrial CO2 emission in Taiwan: an input-output approach , 1998 .

[5]  M. Lenzen Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis , 1998 .

[6]  Liying Li,et al.  Carbon dioxide emission drivers for a typical metropolis using input–output structural decomposition analysis , 2013 .

[7]  Yih F. Chang,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of industrial CO2 emission (1989-2004) in Taiwan by input-output structural decomposition , 2008 .

[8]  R. Schaeffer,et al.  Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input–output approach , 2001 .

[9]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural decomposition techniques : sense and sensitivity , 1998 .

[10]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Decomposing energy intensity change: A combination of index decomposition analysis and production-theoretical decomposition analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Shichen Xie,et al.  The driving forces of China׳s energy use from 1992 to 2010: An empirical study of input–output and structural decomposition analysis , 2014 .

[12]  Youguo Zhang,et al.  Structural decomposition analysis of sources of decarbonizing economic development in China; 1992-2006 , 2009 .

[13]  Victor Moutinho,et al.  Change in energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions in Portuguese tourism: a decomposition analysis from 2000 to 2008 , 2016 .

[14]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input–output analysis , 2015 .

[15]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments , 2012 .

[16]  Adam Rose,et al.  Sources of change in energy use in the U.S. economy, 1972–1982: A structural decomposition analysis , 1991 .

[17]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[18]  J. C. J. M. Bergh,et al.  Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index , 2003 .

[19]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade and the driving forces: Processing and normal exports , 2013 .

[20]  Qin Zhu,et al.  Calculation and decomposition of indirect carbon emissions from residential consumption in China based on the input–output model , 2012 .

[21]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  CO2 emissions of China's commercial and residential buildings: Evidence and reduction policy , 2015 .

[22]  Sue J. Lin,et al.  Structural decomposition of CO2 emissions from Taiwan's petrochemical industries , 2001 .

[23]  Rosa Duarte,et al.  Comparison of energy intensities in European Union countries. Results of a structural decomposition analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Mohamed Moubarak,et al.  Decomposition analysis: Change of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry , 2013 .

[25]  Vicent Alcántara,et al.  Input-output subsystems and pollution: An application to the service sector and CO2 emissions in Spain , 2009 .

[26]  Adam Rose,et al.  INPUT-OUTPUT STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL , 1996 .

[27]  Michael L. Lahr,et al.  China's energy consumption change from 1987 to 2007: A multi-regional structural decomposition analysis , 2014 .

[28]  Zhifeng Yang,et al.  A spatio-temporal decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emission growth in China , 2015 .

[29]  Isabela Butnar,et al.  Structural decomposition analysis and input–output subsystems: Changes in CO2 emissions of Spanish service sectors (2000–2005) , 2011 .