The Emergence of Second‐Tier Auditors in the US: Evidence from Investor Perceptions of Financial Reporting Credibility

We examine changes in the association between auditor type (Big 4, Second‐Tier, and Other non‐Big 4) and perceived financial reporting credibility in the wake of events (e.g., Andersen's failure, the implementation of SOX, creation of the PCAOB, etc.) which led to significant growth in Second‐Tier client portfolios and increased scrutiny of Second‐Tier audit practices. Our results reveal that financial reporting credibility of Second‐Tier clients was lower than that of Big 4 clients and was indistinguishable from that of Other non‐Big 4 clients pre‐Andersen. However, post‐Andersen, we find that financial reporting credibility of Second‐Tier clients is higher than that of Other non‐Big 4 clients and is indistinguishable from that of Big 4 clients. We expect that our results will be of interest to regulators, both in the United States and in the European Union, who have expressed concerns about the current state of competition in the audit market, management and boards of directors that are contemplating switching to a Second‐Tier audit firm, and academics investigating quality differences among audit firm types.

[1]  Competition and choice in the UK audit market Prepared for Department of Trade and Industry and Financial Reporting Council April 2006 , 2006 .

[2]  Mark A. Clatworthy,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Status on External Audit Fees: Evidence from the UK , 2007 .

[3]  Jeffrey A. Pittman,et al.  Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms , 2004 .

[4]  Marlene Plumlee,et al.  The Relation Between Expected Returns, Realized Returns, and Firm Risk Characteristics* , 2010 .

[5]  Chris E. Hogan,et al.  Market Response to Earnings Surprises Conditional on Reasons for an Auditor Change , 2002 .

[6]  D. Foroghi,et al.  Audit Firm Size and Going-Concern Reporting Accuracy , 2012 .

[7]  Peter Easton,et al.  Pe Ratios, Peg Ratios, and Estimating the Implied Expected Rate of Return on Equity Capital , 2003 .

[8]  Holger Daske.  Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or Usgaap - Has the Expected Cost of Equity Capital Really Decreased? , 2006 .

[9]  Shane Heitzman,et al.  Taxes, Leverage, and the Cost of Equity Capital , 2005 .

[10]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread , 1986 .

[11]  Charles M. C. Lee,et al.  Toward an Implied Cost of Capital , 2000 .

[12]  Darius P. Miller,et al.  Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market , 2004 .

[13]  Roger D. Martin,et al.  Risk Shifts in the Market for Audits: An Examination of Changes in Risk for “Second Tier” Audit Firms , 2009 .

[14]  Gady Jacoby,et al.  On Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread , 2001 .

[15]  Thomas C. Omer,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Governance on Auditor-Client Realignments , 2012 .

[16]  K. K. Raman,et al.  Do the Big 4 and the Second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? , 2010 .

[17]  L. DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor size and audit quality , 1981 .

[18]  Christine Botosan,et al.  The Relation between Expected Returns, Realized Returns, and Firm Risk Characteristics , 2011 .

[19]  Merton H. Miller.  The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment , 1958 .

[20]  S. Balsam,et al.  Auditor Industry Specialization and Earnings Quality , 2003 .

[21]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management , 1998 .

[22]  Shivaram Rajgopal,et al.  Why is the Accrual Anomaly not Arbitraged Away? The Role of Idiosyncratic Risk and Transaction Costs , 2006 .

[23]  Marlene Plumlee,et al.  Assessing Alternative Proxies for the Expected Risk Premium , 2005 .

[24]  D. Rama,et al.  Resignations by the Big 4 and the Market for Audit Services , 2006 .

[25]  R. Banz,et al.  The relationship between return and market value of common stocks , 1981 .

[26]  K. K. Raman,et al.  Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 versus Non‐Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo‐American Countries , 2004 .

[27]  E. Fama,et al.  Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns , 1995 .

[28]  J. Krishnan,et al.  The Differentiation of Quality among Auditors: Evidence from the Not‐for‐Profit Sector , 2000 .

[29]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[30]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects , 2000 .

[31]  David B. Farber,et al.  Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter? , 2004 .

[32]  Nan Zhou,et al.  Auditor Reputation, Auditor Independence, and the Stock-Market Impact of Andersen's Indictment on Its Client Firms* , 2005 .

[33]  Ľuboš Pástor,et al.  Stock Valuation and Learning About Profitability , 2002 .

[34]  Walter Aerts,et al.  Web-Based Non-Financial Disclosure and Cost of Finance , 2010 .

[35]  E. Fama,et al.  Industry costs of equity , 1997 .

[36]  Siew Hong Teoh,et al.  Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient , 1993 .

[37]  Jacob K. Thomas,et al.  Equity Premia as Low as Three Percent? Evidence from Analysts' Earnings Forecasts for Domestic and International Stock Markets , 2001 .

[38]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism , 1999 .

[39]  Jacqueline S. Hammersley,et al.  Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 , 2007 .

[40]  Partha S. Mohanram,et al.  Inferring the Cost of Capital Using the Ohlson–Juettner Model , 2003 .

[41]  D. Simunic,et al.  An analysis of cross-sectional differences in big and non-big public accounting firms' audit programs , 2006 .

[42]  P. Santa-clara,et al.  Idiosyncratic Risk Matters! , 2002 .

[43]  Jacqueline S. Hammersley,et al.  Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 , 2008 .

[44]  Yuan Xie.  The Market Effects of Breaking a String of Meeting or Beating Analysts Expectations: Downward Revision of Future Cash Flows or Increase in Cost of Equity Capital? , 2011 .

[45]  Rafael La Porta,et al.  Expectations and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns , 1996 .