Semantic Web for the Legal Domain: The next step

Ontology-driven systems with reasoning capabilities in the legal field are now better understood. Legal concepts are not discrete, but make up a dynamic continuum between common sense terms, specific technical use, and professional knowledge, in an evolving institutional reality. Thus, the tension between a plural understanding of regulations and a more general understanding of law is bringing into view a new landscape in which general legal frameworks – grounded in well-known legal theories stemming from 20th-century c. legal positivism or sociological jurisprudence – are made compatible with specific forms of rights management on the Web. In this sense, Semantic Web tools are not only being designed for information retrieval, classification, clustering, and knowledge management. They can also be understood as regulatory tools, i.e. as components of the contemporary legal architecture, to be used by multiple stakeholders – front-line practitioners, policymakers, legal drafters, companies, market agents, and citizens. That is the issue broadly addressed in this Special Issue on the Semantic Web for the Legal Domain, overviewing the work carried out over the last fifteen years, and seeking to foster new research in this field, beyond the state of the art.

[1]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  The Live OWL Documentation Environment: A Tool for the Automatic Generation of Ontology Documentation , 2012, EKAW.

[2]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  An OWL ontology library representing judicial interpretations , 2016, Semantic Web.

[3]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  Ontology Representation - Design Patterns and Ontologies that Make Sense , 2009, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[4]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[5]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[6]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  License Linked Data Resources Pattern , 2013, WOP.

[7]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  A Constructive Framework for Legal Ontologies , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[8]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic Web: A Legal Case Study , 2006 .

[9]  Michael J. Maher,et al.  Representation results for defeasible logic , 2000, TOCL.

[10]  David M. Shotton,et al.  Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[11]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Linked Data for science and education , 2013, Semantic Web.

[12]  Hugh Glaser,et al.  Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[13]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[14]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[15]  Simonetta Montemagni,et al.  A two-level knowledge approach to support multilingual legislative drafting , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.

[16]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic enhancement for legal information retrieval: Iuriservice performance , 2007, ICAIL.

[17]  Angelo Di Iorio,et al.  Managing semantics in XML vocabularies: an experience in the legal and legislative domain , 2010 .

[18]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology: Advanced intelligent technologies for dispute resolution , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Collective knowledge systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[20]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  Spatial Planning on the Semantic Web , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[21]  David Shotton,et al.  Publishing: Open citations , 2013, Nature.

[22]  Simonetta Montemagni,et al.  Building an ontological support for multilingual legislative drafting , 2007, JURIX.

[23]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic Web Regulatory Models: Why Ethics Matter , 2015 .

[24]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Moving in the Time: An Ontology for Identifying Legal Resources , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[25]  Fouad Zablith,et al.  The OU Linked Open Data: Production and Consumption , 2011, Linked Learning@ESWC.

[26]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  A Linked-Data-Driven and Semantically-Enabled Journal Portal for Scientometrics , 2013, SEMWEB.

[27]  Nuno Silva,et al.  Defining Human-Machine Micro-Task Workflows for Constitution Making , 2015, GDN.

[28]  James A. Hendler,et al.  US Government Linked Open Data: Semantic.data.gov , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[29]  Axel Polleres,et al.  Agreement Technologies and the Semantic Web , 2013 .

[30]  Fabien L. Gandon,et al.  RDF 1.1 XML Syntax , 2014 .

[31]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Ontologies in the Legal Domain , 2008, Digital Government.

[32]  Anita de Waard,et al.  From Proteins to Fairytales: Directions in Semantic Publishing , 2010, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[33]  Rosa Gil,et al.  A web ontologies framework for digital rights management , 2007, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[34]  Alessandro Mazzei,et al.  FrameNet model of the suspension of norms , 2011, ICAIL.

[35]  Graham Greenleaf AustLII’s Business Models: Constraints and Opportunities in Funding Free Access to Law , 2009 .

[36]  Alexander Boer,et al.  Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web , 2009, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[37]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[38]  Tim Clark Next Generation Scientific Publishing and the Web of Data , 2014, Semantic Web.

[39]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  Linking legal open data: breaking the accessibility and language barrier in european legislation and case law , 2015, ICAIL.

[40]  Pompeu Casanovas Conceptualisation of rights and meta-rule of law for the web of data , 2015 .

[41]  Albert Meroño-Peñuela,et al.  Ontological Semantics for Data Privacy Compliance: The NEURONA Project , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Intelligent Information Privacy Management.

[42]  Nikolaos Laoutaris,et al.  Data Transparency Lab Kick Off Workshop (DTL 2014) Report , 2015, CCRV.

[43]  J. Carroll,et al.  Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[44]  Graham Greenleaf,et al.  The Meaning of 'Free Access to Legal Information': A Twenty Year Evolution , 2012 .

[45]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  At your service, on the definition of services from sources of law , 2015, ICAIL.

[46]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Legislative XML: Principles and Technical Tools , 2012 .

[47]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law and ICT: State of the Art and Trends in European Research , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[48]  Jorge González-Conejero,et al.  Privacy-by-Norms Privacy Expectations in Online Interactions , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops.

[49]  Silvio Peroni,et al.  Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data , 2015, J. Documentation.

[50]  Wim Peters,et al.  The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS , 2007, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[51]  Yolanda Gil,et al.  A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[52]  David M. Shotton,et al.  Adventures in Semantic Publishing: Exemplar Semantic Enhancements of a Research Article , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[53]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontology Engineering in a Networked World , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[54]  Enrico Francesconi Semantic model for legal resources: Annotation and reasoning over normative provisions , 2016, Semantic Web.

[55]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Towards a country-independent data format: the Akoma Ntoso experience , 2007 .

[56]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  A Linked Term Bank of Copyright-Related Terms , 2015, JURIX.

[57]  Serge Gutwirth,et al.  Reforming European Data Protection Law , 2014 .

[58]  Louis Y. Y. Lu,et al.  A survey of intellectual property rights literature from 1971 to 2012: The main path analysis , 2014, Proceedings of PICMET '14 Conference: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology; Infrastructure and Service Integration.

[59]  R. V. Kralingen Frame-Based Conceptual Models Of Statute Law , 1995 .

[60]  Ugo Pagallo,et al.  The Laws of Robots - Crimes, Contracts, and Torts , 2013, Law, Governance and Technology Series.

[61]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Multi-layer Markup and Ontological Structures in Akoma Ntoso , 2009, AICOL Workshops.

[62]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Fighting Organized Crime Through Open Source Intelligence: Regulatory Strategies of the CAPER Project , 2014, JURIX.

[63]  Steve Pettifer,et al.  Ceci n'est pas un hamburger: modelling and representing the scholarly article , 2011, Learn. Publ..

[64]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies , 2011, Semantic Web.

[65]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[66]  Boris Motik,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: structural specification and functional-style syntax , 2008 .

[67]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  On the Interactional Meaning of Fundamental Legal Concepts , 2014, JURIX.

[68]  Boris Motik,et al.  Hypertableau Reasoning for Description Logics , 2009, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[69]  Nandana Mihindukulasooriya,et al.  Rights declaration in Linked Data , 2013, COLD.

[70]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[71]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Toward a New Generation of Semantic Web Applications , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[72]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Akoma-Ntoso for Legal Documents , 2011 .

[73]  Maarten Marx,et al.  The quality of the XML Web , 2013, J. Web Semant..

[74]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  Detecting Regulatory Compliance for Business Process Models through Semantic Annotations , 2008, Business Process Management Workshops.

[75]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, two core ontologies for law , 2004 .

[76]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Design Patterns for Legal Ontology Constructions , 2007, LOAIT.

[78]  M. Poblet Visualizing the law: crisis mapping as an open tool for legal practice , 2013 .

[79]  Francisco J. Serón,et al.  PPROC, an ontology for transparency in public procurement , 2016, Semantic Web.

[80]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Constructing a legal core ontology: LRI-Core , 2004 .

[81]  Guido Governatori,et al.  LegalRuleML: Design Principles and Foundations , 2015, Reasoning Web.

[82]  L. Floridi,et al.  The Ethics of Information , 2013, Dialogue.

[83]  Monica Palmirani Legislative Change Management with Akoma-Ntoso , 2011 .

[84]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[85]  Monica Palmirani,et al.  Legal Rules Modelling Meets the Web , 2013, DoCoPe@JURIX.

[86]  Silvio Peroni Semantic Web Technologies and Legal Scholarly Publishing , 2014 .

[87]  Jie Lin,et al.  Linked legal data: improving access to regulations , 2012, dg.o '12.

[88]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Tools for the Automatic Generation of Ontology Documentation: A Task-Based Evaluation , 2013, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[89]  Giuseppe Contissa,et al.  Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling , 2009, RuleML.

[90]  Simon Steyskal,et al.  If you can't enforce it, contract it: Enforceability in Policy-Driven (Linked) Data Markets , 2015, SEMANTiCS.

[91]  Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel,et al.  Overview of the MPEG-21 Media Contract Ontology , 2016, Semantic Web.

[92]  Mark Van Hoecke,et al.  What is legal theory , 1985 .

[93]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web , 2008, CACM.

[94]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  A web observatory for the machine processability of structured data on the web , 2014, WebSci '14.

[95]  Michael Curtotti,et al.  Machine learning for readability of legislative sentences , 2015, ICAIL.

[96]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  A co-regulatory approach to stay safe online: reporting inappropriate content with the MediaKids mobile app , 2017 .

[97]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[98]  A. Valente,et al.  Legal Knowledge Engineering - A Modelling Approach , 1995 .

[99]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Legal Knowledge Conveyed by Narratives: Towards a Representational Model , 2014, CMN.

[100]  Serena Villata,et al.  One License to Compose Them All - A Deontic Logic Approach to Data Licensing on the Web of Data , 2013, SEMWEB.

[101]  Andre Valente,et al.  A functional ontology of law , 1994 .

[102]  Enrico Motta,et al.  LOTED 2 : An Ontology of European Public Procurement Notices Journal Item , 2018 .

[103]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  VOWL 2: User-Oriented Visualization of Ontologies , 2014, EKAW.

[104]  Núria Casellas Legal ontology engineering : methodologies, modelling trends, and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge , 2011 .

[105]  Leonardo Lesmo,et al.  Modificatory provisions detection: a hybrid NLP approach , 2013, ICAIL.