Collective Homeostasis and Time-resolved Models of Self-organised Task Allocation

One of the main factors behind the amazing ecological success of social insects is their ability to flexibly allocate the colony's workforce to all the different tasks it has to address. Insights into the self-organised task allocation methods used for this have given rise to the design of an important class of bio-inspired algorithms for network control, industrial optimisation, and other applications. The most widely used class of models for self-organised task allocation, which also forms the core of these algorithms, are response threshold models. We revisit response threshold models with new experiments using temperature regulation in bumblebee colonies as the model system. We show that standard response threshold models do not fit our experiments and present an alternative behavioural model. This captures a fine-grained, time resolved picture of task engagement, which enables us to investigate task allocation with a different set of statistical methods. Using these we show that our model fits the experiment well and explains its salient aspects. We compare the effectiveness of our model behaviour with that of response threshold models and demonstrate that it can lead to more efficient task management when demands fluctuate. Our results have the potential to provide a basis for the design of more efficient task allocation algorithms for dynamic environments and to elucidate important biological questions, such as the functional role of inter-individual variation.

[1]  Raphaël Jeanson,et al.  Interindividual variability in social insects – proximate causes and ultimate consequences , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  M. Pagano,et al.  Survival analysis. , 1996, Nutrition.

[3]  R. Hidalgo,et al.  Conditions for the emergence of scaling in the inter-event time of uncorrelated and seasonal systems , 2006 .

[4]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Evolution of self-organized division of labor in a response threshold model , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  K. Vahala Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[7]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Noise improves collective decision-making by ants in dynamic environments , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  R. E. Moore,et al.  Individual bumblebees vary in response to disturbance: a test of the defensive reserve hypothesis , 2012, Insectes Sociaux.

[9]  G. Weisbuch,et al.  Market Organisation and Trading Relationships , 2000 .

[10]  Grégoire Nicolis,et al.  Introduction to Nonlinear Science: References , 1995 .

[11]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Workers ‘specialized’ on inactivity: Behavioral consistency of inactive workers and their role in task allocation , 2015, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[13]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization: Overview and Recent Advances , 2018, Handbook of Metaheuristics.

[15]  B. Cole,et al.  The social behavior of Leptothorax allardycei (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): time budgets and the evolution of worker reproduction , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling and Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[17]  L. Keller,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Self-Organized Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2011 .

[18]  M. Manhart,et al.  Markov Processes , 2018, Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Simulation.

[19]  Susan M. Bertram,et al.  Division of labor in a dynamic environment: response by honeybees (Apis mellifera) to graded changes in colony pollen stores , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  Kevin M. Passino,et al.  Biomimicry for Optimization, Control and Automation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  Falko Dressler,et al.  Self-organization in sensor and actor networks , 2007, Wiley series in communications networking and distributed systems.

[22]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  F. Dressler,et al.  Self-organization in Autonomous Sensor and Actuator Networks , 2007 .

[24]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[25]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[26]  M. Breed,et al.  Social context influences the initiation and threshold of thermoregulatory behaviour in honeybees , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[28]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[29]  Anja Weidenmüller,et al.  The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response , 2004 .

[30]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[31]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Neural Networks as Mechanisms to Regulate Division of Labor , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Sean O'Donnell,et al.  Thresholds of Response in Nest Thermoregulation by Worker Bumble Bees, Bombus bifarius nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2001 .

[33]  Gwenaël Kaminski,et al.  Individual Experience Alone Can Generate Lasting Division of Labor in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[34]  N. Franks,et al.  How experienced individuals contribute to an improvement in collective performance in ants , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[36]  Christoph Kleineidam,et al.  Collective control of nest climate parameters in bumblebee colonies , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Bumblebee response thresholds and body size: does worker diversity increase colony performance? , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[39]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  F. Roces,et al.  Behavioural plasticity in the fanning response of bumblebee workers: impact of experience and rate of temperature change , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[42]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Ventilation response thresholds do not change with age or self-reinforcement in workers of the bumble bee Bombus impatiens , 2011, Insectes Sociaux.