Use of compromise-based local porosities for coarse grid DEM simulation of bubbling fluidized bed with large particles

Abstract In discrete element method (DEM) for simulations of gas–solid fluidized beds, coarse grid calculation can lead to excessive smoothing of local porosities for correlating drag on individual particles. This article tries to calculate local porosities with consideration of the heterogeneous particle distribution within a coarse grid. The compromise-based local porosity (CLP) model is set up and incorporated into coarse grid DEM simulations of gas–solid fluidized beds with large particles. Simulated bubble size and shape are in good agreement with experimental results. Various complex bubbling phenomena are described such as bubble eruption, bubble rupture and bubble coalescence. The fluctuations of solid volume fraction, relative pressure and bed layer height simulated at the fine-tuned parameters are in general agreement with the experimental data. These results indicate that the proposed CLP model is suitable to characterize distinct heterogeneities within coarse grids.

[1]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combining discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics , 1997 .

[2]  J. Kuipers,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidised bed: A hard-sphere approach. , 1996 .

[3]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Why the two-fluid model fails to predict the bed expansion characteristics of Geldart A particles in gas-fluidized beds: A tentative answer , 2009 .

[4]  C. Wen Mechanics of Fluidization , 1966 .

[5]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[6]  Jesse Zhu,et al.  Characterizing particle aggregates in a high-density and high-flux CFB riser , 2002 .

[7]  O. Molerus,et al.  Transient dynamics of solid concentration in downer fluidized bed , 1998 .

[8]  Yong Jin,et al.  CFD–DEM simulation of gas–solid reacting flows in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process , 2010 .

[9]  Kemal Tuzla,et al.  Parametric effects of particle size and gas velocity on cluster characteristics in fast fluidized beds , 2000 .

[10]  Jinghai Li,et al.  Discrete simulations of heterogeneous structure and dynamic behavior in gas-solid fluidization , 1999 .

[11]  Wei Ge,et al.  Eulerian simulation of heterogeneous gas–solid flows in CFB risers: EMMS-based sub-grid scale model with a revised cluster description , 2008 .

[12]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Flow regimes in a spout-fluid bed : A combined experimental and simulation study , 2005 .

[13]  Chen Juhui,et al.  Numerical simulation of particle motion in vibrated fluidized beds , 2010 .

[14]  Yincheng Guo,et al.  Cluster-based drag coefficient model for simulating gas–solid flow in a fast-fluidized bed , 2008 .

[15]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Experimental validation of Lagrangian-Eulerian simulations of fluidized beds , 2001 .

[16]  X. Qi Experimental Study of Solids Holdups Inside Particle Clusters in CFB Risers , 2005 .

[17]  He Yurong,et al.  Numerical simulation of particle motion in a gradient magnetically assisted fluidized bed , 2010 .

[18]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[19]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed , 1993 .

[20]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Discrete particle simulations of an electric-field enhanced fluidized bed , 2008 .

[21]  Dimitri Gidaspow,et al.  Hydrodynamics of fluidization using kinetic theory: an emerging paradigm: 2002 Flour-Daniel lecture , 2004 .