Students’ learning experience in a multidisciplinary innovation project

PurposeCollaboration between universities and industry is increasingly perceived as a vehicle to enhance innovation. Educational institutions are encouraged to build partnerships and multidisciplinary projects based around real-world open problems. Projects need to benefit student learning, not only the organisations looking for innovations. The context of this study is a multidisciplinary innovation project, as experienced by the students of an University of Applied Sciences in Finland. The purpose of this paper is to unfold students’ conceptions of the learning experience, to help teachers and curriculum designers to organise optimal conditions and processes, and support competence development. The research question was: How do students in higher professional education experience their learning in a multidisciplinary innovation project?Design/methodology/approachThe study took a phenomenographic approach. The data were collected in the form of weekly diaries, maintained by the cultural management and social services students (n=74) in a mandatory multidisciplinary innovation project in professional higher education in Finland. The diary data were analysed using thematic inductive analysis.FindingsThe results of the study revealed that students’ understood the learning experience in relation to solvable conflicts and unusual situations they experienced during the project, while becoming aware of and claiming their collaborative agency and internalising phases of an innovation process. The competences as learning outcomes that students could name as developed related to content knowledge, different personal characteristics, social skills, emerging leadership skills, creativity, future orientation, social skills, technical, crafting and testing skills and innovation implementation-related skills, such as marketing, sales and entrepreneurship planning skills. However, future orientation and implementation planning skills showed more weakly than other variables in the data.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that curriculum design should enable networked, student-led and teacher supported pedagogical innovation processes that involve a whole path from future thinking and idea development through prototyping to implementation planning of the novel solution. Teachers promote deep comprehension of the innovation process, monitor and ease the pain of conflict if it threatens motivation, offer assessment tools and help in recognising gaps in individual competences and development needs, promote more future-oriented, concrete and implementable outcomes, and facilitate in bridging from innovation towards entrepreneurship planning.Originality/valueThe multidisciplinary innovation project described in this study provides a pedagogical way to connect higher education to the practises of society. These results provide encouraging findings for organising multidisciplinary project activities between education and working life. The paper, therefore, has significant value for teachers and entrepreneurship educators in designing curriculum and facilitating projects. The study promotes the dissemination of innovation development programmes in between education and work organisations also in other than technical and commercial fields.

[1]  Anneli Eteläpelto,et al.  What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work , 2013 .

[2]  Edward Henry Mathews,et al.  Integrating innovation skills in an introductory engineering design-build course , 2012 .

[3]  J. Nielsen Assessment of Innovation Competency: A Thematic Analysis of Upper Secondary School Teachers’ Talk , 2015 .

[4]  Alfredo Biffi,et al.  A rhizomatic learning process to create collective knowledge in entrepreneurship education: Open innovation and collaboration beyond boundaries , 2017 .

[5]  Vesa Taatila,et al.  Individual Innovation Competence: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda , 2017 .

[6]  Karen Strohm Kitchner Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[7]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation , 2005 .

[8]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[9]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[10]  Eila Lindfors,et al.  From Gender-segregated Subjects to Multi-material Craft: Craft Student Teachers’Views on the Future of the Craft Subject , 2015 .

[11]  D. Vashdi,et al.  Innovation in multidisciplinary teams: The moderating role of transformational leadership in the relationship between professional heterogeneity and shared mental models , 2015 .

[12]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[13]  Vesa Taatila Learning entrepreneurship in higher education , 2010 .

[14]  Vesa Taatila,et al.  Philosophical Review of Pragmatism as a Basis for Learning by Developing Pedagogy , 2012 .

[15]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[16]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods , 2005 .

[17]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Symeon Retalis,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on Web-2.0 technologies in support of team-based learning for innovation , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Tobias Stucki,et al.  What Determines the Innovation Capability of Firm Founders? , 2010 .

[20]  Timothy A. Post,et al.  On the solving of ill-structured problems. , 1988 .

[21]  Dean Bruton,et al.  Learning creativity and design for innovation , 2011 .

[22]  Juhani Ukko,et al.  Performance measurement in university–industry innovation networks: implementation practices and challenges of industrial organisations , 2018 .

[23]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Learning to design collaboratively: Participation of student designers in a Community of Innovation , 2011 .

[24]  C. Linder,et al.  Reflection and phenomenography: towards theoretical and educational development possibilities , 2003 .

[25]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Educating for innovation , 2006 .

[26]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Innovation education programs: toward a conceptual framework , 2014 .

[27]  S. Derry,et al.  Interdisciplinary Collaboration : An Emerging Cognitive Science , 2014 .

[28]  K. Illeris What Do We Actually Mean by Experiential Learning? , 2007 .

[29]  Alex Maritz,et al.  Innovation training within the Australian advanced manufacturing industry , 2013 .

[30]  Kenneth B. Kahn The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development , 1996 .

[31]  Anne Edwards,et al.  Being an Expert Professional Practitioner , 2010 .

[32]  D. Kolb,et al.  Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Experiential Educators in Higher Education , 2022, Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.

[33]  Masumi Iida,et al.  Using diary methods in psychological research. , 2012 .

[34]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[35]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[36]  J. Dewey Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[37]  S. Ankrah,et al.  Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review , 2015 .

[38]  A. Edwards Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise , 2010 .

[39]  M. London,et al.  Interdisciplinary Professional Education: Training College Students for Collaborative Social Change , 2013 .

[40]  Judith Gulikers,et al.  An assessment innovation as flywheel for changing teaching and learning , 2018 .

[41]  Terri R. Kurtzberg Feeling Creative, Being Creative: An Empirical Study of Diversity and Creativity in Teams , 2005 .

[42]  Pedro J. Perez,et al.  Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter?☆ , 2014 .

[43]  D. Gilbert From chalk and talk to walking the walk: Facilitating dynamic learning contexts for entrepreneurship students in fast‐tracking innovations , 2012 .

[44]  Jing Zhou,et al.  When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[46]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Sarah Minty,et al.  Modularisation approaches in Initial Vocational Education: evidence for policy convergence in Europe? , 2018 .

[48]  F. Marton Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[49]  G. Vandervegt Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[50]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action , 2000 .

[51]  J. Suomala,et al.  Framework to study the social innovation networks , 2006 .

[52]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Technological Innovation: On the Origins and Development of an Inclusive Concept , 2016, Technology and culture.

[53]  Birgitta Sandberg,et al.  Networks for the commercialization of innovations: A review of how divergent network actors contribute , 2014 .

[54]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? , 1996 .

[55]  J. D. Wulfhorst,et al.  Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research , 2007 .

[56]  A. Ghobadian,et al.  Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship , 2015 .

[57]  Ference Marton,et al.  On the unit of description in phenomenography , 2005 .

[58]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[59]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[60]  Göte Nyman,et al.  Pedagogical Design for Knowledge Creating Inquiry in Customer Projects , 2013 .

[61]  Ingunn Johanne Ness,et al.  Openness, curiosity and respect: Underlying conditions for developing innovative knowledge and ideas between disciplines , 2015 .

[62]  Eetu Pikkarainen,et al.  Competence as a Key Concept of Educational Theory: A Semiotic Point of View. , 2014 .

[63]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[64]  G. Mulgan,et al.  Social Innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated , 2007 .

[65]  C. Odoardi,et al.  Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behaviour: Proactive goal generation matters , 2014 .

[66]  Ville Isomöttönen,et al.  Learning mechanisms in multidisciplinary teamwork with real customers and open-ended problems , 2015 .

[67]  Lucio Soibelman,et al.  Collaborative design processes: An active- and reflective-learning course in multidisciplinary collaboration , 2003 .

[68]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea , 2017 .

[69]  J. Bowden,et al.  Relationality and the myth of objectivity in research involving human participants , 2010 .

[70]  Alfredo Biffi,et al.  Chasing innovation: a pilot case study of a rhizomatic design thinking education program , 2017 .

[71]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[72]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation Teams , 2010 .

[73]  Learning to create new solutions together: A focus group study exploring interprofessional innovation in midwifery education. , 2016, Nurse education in practice.

[74]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship , 2015 .

[75]  Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin,et al.  Educating Higher Education Students for Innovative Economies: What International Data Tell Us , 2014 .

[76]  Markus F. Peschl,et al.  Learning How to Innovate as a Socio-epistemological Process of Co-creation: Towards a Constructivist Teaching Strategy for Innovation , 2014 .

[77]  S. Sambrook,et al.  Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation , 2009 .

[78]  J. Dewey My Pedagogic Creed , 1926 .

[79]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[80]  Judith Gulikers,et al.  Models and Principles for Designing Competence-based Curricula, Teaching, Learning and Assessment , 2017 .

[81]  R. P. Mohanty,et al.  Determinants of innovation as a competence: an empirical study , 2011 .