A multiple circular path convolution neural network system for detection of mammographic masses

A multiple circular path convolution neural network (MCPCNN) architecture specifically designed for the analysis of tumor and tumor-like structures has been constructed. We first divided each suspected tumor area into sectors and computed the defined mass features for each sector independently. These sector features were used on the input layer and were coordinated by convolution kernels of different sizes that propagated signals to the second layer in the neural network system. The convolution kernels were trained, as required, by presenting the training cases to the neural network. In this study, randomly selected mammograms were processed by a dual morphological enhancement technique. Radiodense areas were isolated and were delineated using a region growing algorithm. The boundary of each region of interest was then divided into 36 sectors using 36 equi-angular dividers radiated from the center of the region. A total of 144 Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System-based features (i.e., four features per sector for 36 sectors) were computed as input values for the evaluation of this newly invented neural network system. The overall performance was 0.78-0.80 for the areas (A/sub z/) under the receiver operating characteristic curves using the conventional feed-forward neural network in the detection of mammographic masses. The performance was markedly improved with A/sub z/ values ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 using the MCPCNN. This paper does not intend to claim the best mass detection system. Instead it reports a potentially better neural network structure for analyzing a set of the mass features defined by an investigator.

[1]  Matthew T. Freedman,et al.  Artificial convolution neural network techniques and applications for lung nodule detection , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  S. Wall,et al.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Zuurbier,et al.  Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathologic specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1995 .

[4]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. , 1996, Medical physics.

[6]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[8]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[10]  Huai Li,et al.  Artificial convolution neural network for medical image pattern recognition , 1995, Neural Networks.

[11]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Computerized radiographic mass detection. II. Decision support by featured database visualization and modular neural networks , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  M. Homer,et al.  Imaging features and management of characteristically benign and probably benign breast lesions. , 1987, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[14]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Computerized radiographic mass detection. I. Lesion site selection by morphological enhancement and contextual segmentation , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .

[16]  S Shapiro,et al.  Screening: Assessment of current studies , 1994, Cancer.

[17]  L Tabar,et al.  Screening with mammography. , 1990, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[18]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[19]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. , 1992, Medical physics.

[21]  L. Tabár,et al.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  Masayuki Murakami,et al.  Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Akira Hasegawa,et al.  Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathological specimen for the diagnosis of breast cancer , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[26]  H P Chan,et al.  Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification. , 1996, Medical physics.

[27]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  D Brzakovic,et al.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[29]  C. Metz,et al.  A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data , 1984 .