Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach

Functional connectivity between spatially disjoint habitat patches is a key factor for the persistence of species in fragmented landscapes. Modelling landscape connectivity to identify potential dispersal corridors requires information about those landscape features affecting dispersal. Here we present a new approach using spatial and genetic data of a highly fragmented population of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in the Black Forest, Germany, to investigate effects of landscape structure on gene flow and to parameterize a spatially explicit corridor model for conservation purposes. Mantel tests and multiple regressions on distance matrices were employed to detect and quantify the effect of different landscape features on relatedness among individuals, while controlling for the effect of geographic distance. We extrapolated the results to an area‐wide landscape permeability map and developed a new corridor model that incorporates stochasticity in simulating animal movement. The model was evaluated using both a partition of the data previously set apart and independent observation data of dispersing birds. Most land cover variables (such as coniferous forest, forest edges, agricultural land, roads, settlements) and one topographic variable (topographic exposure) were significantly correlated with gene flow. Although inter‐individual relatedness inherently varies greatly and the variance explained by geographic distance and landscape structure was low, the permeability map and the corridor model significantly explained relatedness in the validation data and the spatial distribution of dispersing birds. Thus, landscape structure measurably affected within‐population gene flow in the study area. By converting these effects into spatially explicit information our model enables localizing priority areas for the preservation or restoration of metapopulation connectivity.

[1]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx , 2002 .

[2]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST not equal to 1/(4Nm + 1). , 1999, Heredity.

[3]  Pierre Joly,et al.  Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[4]  Robert G. D'Eon,et al.  Landscape Connectivity as a Function of Scale and Organism Vagility in a Real Forested Landscape , 2002 .

[5]  J. Craig Viable populations for conservation , 1990 .

[6]  J. Goudet FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995) , 2001 .

[7]  R R Sokal,et al.  Spatial genetic structure of human populations in Japan. , 1998, Human biology.

[8]  Veronika Braunisch,et al.  A Model for Evaluating the ‘Habitat Potential’ of a Landscape for Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: A Tool for Conservation Planning , 2007 .

[9]  I. Storch,et al.  Capercaillie in the Alps: genetic evidence of metapopulation structure and population decline , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[10]  M. Smulders,et al.  Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) , 2001, Heredity.

[11]  K. Elmer,et al.  Applying new inter-individual approaches to assess fine-scale population genetic diversity in a neotropical frog, Eleutherodactylus ockendeni , 2007, Heredity.

[12]  Anit Raja Banerjee,et al.  An Introduction to Conservation Genetics , 2010, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[13]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[14]  J. Höglund,et al.  From connectivity to isolation: genetic consequences of population fragmentation in capercaillie across Europe , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[15]  G. Hartvigsen Metapopulation biology: Ecology, genetics, and evolution , 1997 .

[16]  K. Bollmann,et al.  The Importance of Spatial Scale in Habitat Models: Capercaillie in the Swiss Alps , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Effects of Matrix Heterogeneity on Animal Dispersal: From Individual Behavior to Metapopulation‐Level Parameters , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[18]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[19]  Ilse Storch,et al.  Habitat selection by capercaillie in summer and autumn: Is bilberry important? , 1993, Oecologia.

[20]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Stephen J. Mitchell,et al.  Empirical modeling of cutblock edge windthrow risk on Vancouver Island, Canada, using stand level information , 2001 .

[22]  Khalid Belkhir,et al.  IDENTIX , a software to test for relatedness in a population using permutation methods , 2002 .

[23]  Naiara Pinto,et al.  Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[25]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1) , 1999, Heredity.

[26]  M. Fortin,et al.  Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[27]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[28]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[29]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[30]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[31]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[32]  P. Trontelj,et al.  Characterization of microsatellites in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus (AVES) , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[33]  Irene Keller,et al.  Recent habitat fragmentation caused by major roads leads to reduction of gene flow and loss of genetic variability in ground beetles , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  A Practical Map-Analysis Tool for Detecting Potential Dispersal Corridors , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Relative Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Population Extinction , 1997 .

[36]  Rainer Baritz,et al.  Wildlife habitat analysis - a multidimensional habitat management model , 2003 .

[37]  R. Noss,et al.  CARNIVORES AS FOCAL SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION , 2001 .

[38]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[39]  Robert Lee Schooley,et al.  Patchy Landscapes and Animal Movements: Do Beetles Percolate? , 1997 .

[40]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data , 2007 .

[41]  Rob Roy Ramey,et al.  Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep , 2005 .

[42]  Luca Fumagalli,et al.  Landscape genetics of the Alpine newt (Mesotriton alpestris) inferred from a strip-based approach , 2011, Conservation Genetics.

[43]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest planning through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain) , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  A. Clevenger,et al.  GIS‐Generated, Expert‐Based Models for Identifying Wildlife Habitat Linkages and Planning Mitigation Passages , 2002 .

[45]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process , 2006 .

[46]  F. Rousset,et al.  ARE PARTIAL MANTEL TESTS ADEQUATE? , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  N. Perrin,et al.  Viability and Management of an Endangered Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) Metapopulation in the Jura Mountains, Western Switzerland , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[48]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics , 2007 .

[49]  Nathaniel Valière gimlet: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data , 2002 .

[50]  I. Storch Annual home ranges and spacing patterns of capercaillie in Central Europe , 1995 .

[51]  M. Baguette,et al.  Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[52]  S. Manel,et al.  Temporal and spatial analyses disclose consequences of habitat fragmentation on the genetic diversity in capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[53]  I. Storch,et al.  Genetic evidence of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus dispersal sources and sinks in the Alps , 2003, Wildlife Biology.

[54]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[55]  K. McKelvey,et al.  dropout: a program to identify problem loci and samples for noninvasive genetic samples in a capture-mark-recapture framework , 2005 .

[56]  Stephanie Kramer-Schadt,et al.  What you see is where you go? Modeling dispersal in mountainous landscapes , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[57]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics , 2003 .

[58]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) , 2007 .

[59]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[60]  A Coulon,et al.  Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual–based approach , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[61]  Ilse Storch,et al.  Genetic correlates of spatial population structure in central European capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and black grouse T. tetrix: a project in progress , 2000, Wildlife Biology.

[62]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[63]  Xavier Vekemans,et al.  Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models , 1999, Heredity.

[64]  Ilse Storch,et al.  Minimum viable population size of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: results from a stochastic model , 2000, Wildlife Biology.

[65]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatial Graphs: Principles and Applications for Habitat Connectivity , 2007, Ecosystems.

[66]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. , 1999, Genetics.

[67]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON‐EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[68]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[69]  M. Fortin,et al.  Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape‐genetic studies of gene flow , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[70]  François Rousset,et al.  PARTIAL MANTEL TESTS: REPLY TO CASTELLANO AND BALLETTO , 2002 .

[71]  S. Castellano,et al.  IS THE PARTIAL MANTEL TEST INADEQUATE? , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[72]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Integrating individual behaviour and landscape genetics: the population structure of timber rattlesnake hibernacula , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[73]  I. Storch Conservation Status of Grouse Worldwide: An Update , 2007 .

[74]  G. Barbujani Geographic patterns: how to identify them and why. , 2000, Human biology.

[75]  J. Höglund,et al.  Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) , 2001 .

[76]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[77]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[78]  Brett J. Goodwin,et al.  Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[79]  S. Cushman,et al.  Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.