Coverage planning for capacitated field operations, Part I: Task decomposition

In certain field operations, such as fertilising, capacity restrictions lead to significant non-productive in-field travelling and out-of-field transport, thereby reducing field efficiency and increasing operating costs. This indicates a potential benefit from improving the efficiency of capacitated operations by minimising the non-productive travelled elements. A prerequisite for the optimisation of a field operation is the identification of the activities which contribute to the reduction of the efficiency and the definition of the actions that take place during the operation. The objective of this paper was to identify the sources of non-productivity in capacitated field operations and decompose the operation to feasible driving actions. Based on the monitoring of operations and subsequent data analysis, the recorded driven paths were decomposed into four types of non-productive activities. The involved driving actions during the fertilising operation were then defined, and finally, the potential of minimising the contribution of each non-productive activity to the operation efficiency by the selection of appropriate driving actions, was quantified. This assessment revealed that the selection of a subsequent action, might on one hand decrease the contribution of a specific non-productive activity to the total non-working travelled distance, but on the other hand might increase this contribution of another activity. There is therefore a trade-off between the positive contribution to the overall efficiency between one activity and the negative contribution from another. This indicates that a targeted algorithmic optimisation method should be devised by searching for the optimal combination among the prescribed driving actions.

[1]  Robert D. Grisso,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC PATTERNS AND YIELD MONITOR DATA FOR FIELD EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION , 2002 .

[2]  D. Van Oudheusden,et al.  Infield logistics planning for crop-harvesting operations , 2009 .

[3]  D. Bochtis,et al.  AE—Automation and Emerging TechnologiesThe vehicle routing problem in field logistics part I , 2009 .

[4]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  Minimising the non-working distance travelled by machines operating in a headland field pattern , 2008 .

[5]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  Automatic Recognition of Operation Modes of Combines and Transport Units based on GNSS Trajectories , 2013 .

[6]  Carlos Amiama,et al.  Design and field test of an automatic data acquisition system in a self-propelled forage harvester , 2008 .

[7]  Rainer Duttmann,et al.  Spatial analyses of field traffic intensity and modeling of changes in wheel load and ground contact pressure in individual fields during a silage maize harvest , 2013 .

[8]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  Effect of controlled traffic on field efficiency , 2010 .

[9]  Sytze de Bruin,et al.  Optimized routing on agricultural fields by minimizing maneuvering and servicing time , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[10]  C. G Sørensen A Model of Field Machinery Capability and Logistics:the Case of Manure Application , 2003 .

[11]  Claus G. Sørensen,et al.  The vehicle routing problem in field logistics: Part II , 2009 .

[12]  Arto Visala,et al.  Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines , 2009 .

[13]  Claus Grøn Sørensen,et al.  A DSS for planning of soil-sensitive field operations , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..