An Architecture for an Adaptive and Collaborative Learning Management System in Aviation Security

The importance of aviation security has increased dramatically in recent years. Frequently changing regulations and the need to adapt quickly to new and emerging threats are challenges that need to be addressed by airports, security companies and appropriate authorities across the world. Learning management systems (LMS) have been developed as effective tools for enhancing the management, integration and application of knowledge in organizations. In the aviation security domain, we need mechanisms to quickly adapt to new learning content, to different roles ranging from screeners to supervisors, to flexible training scenarios and solid job assessments. For that, a learning system has to be flexible and adaptive both in knowledge, organizational and in collaboration dimensions. Current LMS do not meet these requirements. In this paper we present a software architecture that is apt to support the adaptability and collaboration needs for such a system in aviation security. We discuss the requirements, roles, learning objects and course configuration in terms of adaptive and collaborative learning. We present a six-layer architecture and discuss some of its application scenarios. Our aim is to improve the quality and usefulness of LMS in aviation security by utilizing knowledge-based analysis for data analysis and integrating a process engine for collaborative learning. We briefly report on our prototype and the gained first feedback from the users.

[1]  Udo Winand,et al.  The sharable content object reference model (SCORM) - a critical review , 2002, International Conference on Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings..

[2]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Enabling context-aware and privacy-conscious user data sharing , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management, 2004. Proceedings. 2004.

[3]  Valérie Issarny,et al.  AdHocFS: sharing files in WLANs , 2003, Second IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications, 2003. NCA 2003..

[4]  Stephen J. H. Yang,et al.  Context Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environments for Peer-to-Peer Collaborative Learning , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Tuples on the air: a middleware for context-aware computing in dynamic networks , 2003, 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2003. Proceedings..

[6]  Maomi Ueno,et al.  SALMS: SCORM-compliant Adaptive LMS , 2007 .

[7]  George Colliat,et al.  OLAP, relational, and multidimensional database systems , 1996, SGMD.

[8]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Finding Structure in Unstructured Processes: The Case for Process Mining , 2007, Seventh International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD 2007).

[9]  David Garlan,et al.  Documenting software architectures: views and beyond , 2002, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  Maneesha Singh,et al.  Explosives detection systems (EDS) for aviation security , 2003, Signal Process..

[11]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Information and Hybrid Architecture Model of the OCP Contextual Information Management System , 2006, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[12]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  Bridging cognitive science and education : learning, memory, and metacognition , 2007 .

[13]  Ren-Hung Hwang,et al.  Development of a context-aware messaging system over heterogeneous wireless networks , 2007, IWCMC.

[14]  David Gelernter,et al.  Generative communication in Linda , 1985, TOPL.

[15]  Kerry Raymond,et al.  A tree-based algorithm for distributed mutual exclusion , 1989, TOCS.

[16]  Parimal Kopardekar,et al.  AIR-GROUND INTEGRATION EXPERIMENT , 2001 .

[17]  B. Jenkins,et al.  Protecting Public Surface Transportation Against Terrorism and Serious Crime: Continuing Research on Best Security Practices , 2001 .