Predictability of Brain-Computer Communication

Abstract Since 1996 we have been teaching more than 18 severely or totally paralyzed patients to successfully control the movements of a cursor on a computer screen by means of systematic changes in the amplitudes of their slow cortical potentials (SCPs; Birbaumer, Ghanayim, Hinterberger, Iversen, Kotchoubey et al., 1999). Patients learned regulation of their SCP amplitudes by means of a brain-computer interface (BCI) and on-line feedback about the time course of SCP amplitude shifts, represented by cursor movements on a computer screen. When patients were able to successfully regulate their SCP amplitude, they were trained to use this ability to communicate with friends and caregivers by means of a Language Support Program (Perelmouter, Kotchoubey, Kubler, Taub, & Birbaumer, 1999). Having a reliable predictor of progress in training would be particularly helpful because training patients at their homes requires substantial effort and a positive outcome is desirable given limited personal and financial re...

[1]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Chapter 6 – The Contingent Negative Variations , 1974 .

[2]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[3]  J. Caroscio,et al.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Its natural history. , 1987, Neurologic clinics.

[4]  P. Ackerman Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[5]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Behavioural treatment of slow cortical potentials in intractable epilepsy: neuropsychological predictors of outcome. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: self regulation and individual differences in humans , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[8]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Language support program for thought-translation-devices , 1999 .

[9]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  The thought translation device: a neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[11]  N Birbaumer,et al.  A binary spelling interface with random errors. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain-computer communication: self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  A non-invasive communication device for the paralyzed. , 2002, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[15]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Predictors of successful self control during brain-computer communication , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  A. Kübler,et al.  Training locked-in patients: a challenge for the use of brain-computer interfaces , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  H. Flor,et al.  A multimodal brain-based feedback and communication system , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Conscious perception of brain states: mental strategies for brain–computer communication , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Michael Erb,et al.  Brain areas activated in fMRI during self-regulation of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Automatic processing of self-regulation of slow cortical potentials: evidence from brain-computer communication in paralysed patients , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.