Success in Kashmir: a positive trend in civil-military integration during humanitarian assistance operations.

The modern cast of disaster relief actors includes host nations, non-governmental organisations, private volunteer organisations, military organisations and others. Each group, civilian or military, has valuable skills and experiences critical to disaster relief work. The goal of this paper is to supplement the study of civil-military relief efforts with contemporary anecdotal experience. The paper examines the interaction between US military forces and other disaster relief actors during the 2005 Kashmir earthquake relief effort. The author uses direct observations made while working in Pakistan to contrast the relationships and activities from that effort with other accounts in prevailing scholarly disaster literature and military doctrine. Finally, this paper suggests that the Kashmir model of integration, coordination and transparency of intent creates a framework in which future humanitarian assistance operations could be successfully executed. Recommendations to improve civil-military interaction in future relief efforts will also be addressed.

[1]  A. Roberts Humanitarian war: military intervention and human rights , 1993, The United Nations.

[2]  Peter Walker,et al.  The future of humanitarian action: mapping the implications of Iraq and other recent crises. , 2004, Disasters.

[3]  D. Alexander Globalization of disaster: trends, problems and dilemmas. , 2006 .

[4]  S. Moore,et al.  International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: a case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods. , 2003, Disasters.

[5]  C. Seiple The U.S. Military/NGO Relationship in Humanitarian Interventions, , 1996 .

[6]  Esther K. Hicks,et al.  Coordinating disaster relief after the South Asia earthquake , 2006 .

[7]  J C Gaydos,et al.  Military participation in emergency humanitarian assistance. , 1994, Disasters.

[8]  J. Albala-Bertrand Complex Emergencies versus Natural Disasters: An Analytical Comparison of Causes and Effects , 2000 .

[9]  W. Bello The Rise of the Relief-and-Reconstruction Complex , 2006 .

[10]  M Pugh,et al.  Military intervention and humanitarian action: trends and issues. , 1998, Disasters.

[11]  Fabrice Weissman Humanitarian action and military intervention: temptations and possibilities. , 2004, Disasters.

[12]  D Alexander,et al.  The study of natural disasters, 1977-1997: some reflection on a changing field of knowledge. , 1997, Disasters.

[13]  P. Walker Foreign Military Resources for Disaster Relief: An NGO Perspective , 1992 .

[14]  M Pugh,et al.  The challenge of civil-military relations in international peace operations. , 2001, Disasters.

[15]  Gorm Rye Olsen,et al.  Humanitarian crises: what determines the level of emergency assistance? Media coverage, donor interests and the aid business. , 2003, Disasters.

[16]  John Cosgrave,et al.  The international humanitarian system and the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunamis. , 2007, Disasters.

[17]  Whitman Jim A cautionary note on humanitarian intervention , 1994 .

[18]  J. Moore,et al.  The Senate Should Give Immediate Advice and Consent to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Why the Critics Are Wrong , 2005 .

[19]  F. Cuny Disasters and Development , 1983 .