Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Os

Energy consumption in the operation and maintenance phase of the urban water and wastewater network is directly related to both the quantity and the desired quality of the supplied water/treated wastewater – in other words, to the level of service provided to consumers. The level of service is dependent on not just the quantity and quality of the water but also the state of the infrastructure. Maintaining the infrastructure so as to be able to provide the required high level of service also demands energy. Apart from being a significant operational cost component, energy use also contributes to life-cycle environmental impacts. This paper studies the direct energy consumption in the operation and maintenance phase of the water and wastewater system in Oslo; and presents a break-up among the different components of the network, of quantities, costs and environmental impacts. Owing to the diversity in the periods of time for which comprehensive data for the whole system are available, the study period is restricted to years 2000–2006. The per-capita annual consumption of energy in the operational phase of the system varied between 220 and 260 kWh; and per-capita annual expenses on energy in inflation-adjusted year-2006-Euros ranged between 6.5 and 11 Euros. The energy consumed on the upstream, per unit volume water supplied was around 0.4 kWh on average, while the corresponding value for the downstream was 0.8 kWh per cubic metre wastewater treated. The upstream Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ranged between 70 and 80 g per cubic metre of water supplied, about 22% greater on average than the corresponding specific GHG emissions on the downstream.

[1]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Residential hot water: A behaviorally-driven system , 1988 .

[2]  P. Balmér,et al.  Operation costs and consumption of resources at Nordic nutrient removal plants , 2000 .

[3]  Andreas N. Angelakis,et al.  Application of Cost Criteria for Selection of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems , 2003 .

[4]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Water Treatment Systems , 2007 .

[5]  H. Brattebø,et al.  Combined MFA‐LCA for Analysis of Wastewater Pipeline Networks , 2009 .

[6]  H. Heinonen-Tanski,et al.  Costs of tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater by rapid sand filter with coagulants and UV , 2003 .

[7]  O Nowak,et al.  Benchmarks for the energy demand of nutrient removal plants. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Importance of investment decisions and rehabilitation approaches in an ageing wastewater pipeline network. A case study of Oslo (Norway). , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  A. Horvath,et al.  Energy and air emission effects of water supply. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  William H. Biehl,et al.  Energy optimization for water systems , 2010 .

[11]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation figures for environmental life-cycle assessment: The Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the world (1990 and 1995) , 2003 .

[12]  N Funamizu,et al.  Reuse of heat energy in wastewater: implementation examples in Japan. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Environmental impact analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants: case study of Oslo, Norway. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  Josua P. Meyer,et al.  Domestic hot-water consumption in South African apartments , 1998 .

[15]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  HOUSEHOLD WATER CONSERVATION: THE ROLE OF INDIRECT ENERGY SAVINGS , 1980 .

[16]  J. Keller,et al.  Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  H Wenzel,et al.  Environmental accounting--a decision support tool in WWTP operation and management. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  Rita Ugarelli,et al.  Oslo consumers willing to pay more for improved services , 2010 .