Others' Actions Reduce Crossmodal Integration in Peripersonal Space

Specific mechanisms integrate visual-tactile information close to the body to guide voluntary action [1, 2] and to enable rapid self-defense in peripersonal space [3-5]. In social interactions, others frequently act in one's peripersonal space, thereby changing the relevance of near-body events for one's own actions. Such changes of stimulus relevance may thus affect visual-tactile integration. Here we show that crossmodal processing in peripersonal space is reduced for perceptual events that another person acts upon. Participants performed a visual-tactile interference task [6] in which spatially incongruent visual distractors in the peripersonal space are known to interfere with judging the location of a tactile stimulus [7-10]. Participants performed the task both alone and with a partner who responded to the visual distractors. Performing the task together reduced the crossmodal interference effect on tactile judgments, but only if the partner occupied the participant's peripersonal space (experiment 1) and if she responded to all, rather than only a subset, of the visual distractors (experiment 2). These results show that others' actions can modulate multisensory integration in peripersonal space in a top-down fashion. Such modulations may serve to guide voluntary action and to allow others' actions in a space of self-defense.

[1]  C. Gross,et al.  Spatial maps for the control of movement , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  E. Macaluso,et al.  The representation of space near the body through touch and vision , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Aglioti,et al.  The body in the brain revisited , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  R. Campbell,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Speech Falters under High Attention Demands , 2005, Current Biology.

[6]  F. Pavani,et al.  Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[8]  D. Shore,et al.  Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Graziano,et al.  Complex Movements Evoked by Microstimulation of Precentral Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[10]  C. Spence,et al.  Seeing Your Own Touched Hands in a Mirror Modulates Cross-Modal Interactions , 2002, Psychological science.

[11]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[13]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Is That Near My Hand? Multisensory Representation of Peripersonal Space in Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[15]  C. Spence,et al.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans , 2002, Cognition.

[16]  Charles Spence,et al.  Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[18]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[19]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[22]  Salvador Soto-Faraco,et al.  Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Jessie Chen,et al.  Neurophysiology of prehension. I. Posterior parietal cortex and object-oriented hand behaviors. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  U. Castiello,et al.  Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Representation of Visuotactile Space in the Split Brain , 2001, Psychological science.

[27]  C. Galletti,et al.  Spatial tuning of reaching activity in the medial parieto‐occipital cortex (area V6A) of macaque monkey , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  V. Gallese,et al.  The bodily self as power for action , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  M. Graziano Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  C. Gross,et al.  A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[33]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[34]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Keeping in Touch with One's Self: Multisensory Mechanisms of Self-Consciousness , 2009, PloS one.

[35]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Elena Rusconi,et al.  Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task , 2010, Cognition.

[38]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Grasping actions remap peripersonal space , 2009, Neuroreport.