The main thesis of this paper is that the grammars of natural languages contain an exhaustive set of conditions on the output of the phonological rules – in fact, a surface phonotactics. I shall show that, contrary to what is usually assumed in generative phonology, a surface phonotactics is not redundant in a generative grammar if the grammar is indeed intended as ‘a theory of linguistic competence’ (Chomsky, 1965: 3), and that if any set of rules in the phonological section of the grammar is redundant it is the morphophonotactic rules, better known as morpheme structure conditions. I shall propose a format for the statement of rules (including so-called ‘conspiracies’) which are ‘motivated’ by the phonotactics in the sense of Matthews (1972: 219–220). Finally, I shall present a set of phonotactic rules for consonant clusters in Latin, and show how the statement of certain rules of Latin phonology can be simplified by taking their phonotactic motivation into account.
[1]
P. Kiparsky.
Linguistic universals and linguistic change
,
1968
.
[2]
Charles W. Kisseberth.
On the Functional Unity of Phonological Rules
,
2022
.
[3]
Emmon W. Bach,et al.
Universals in Linguistic Theory
,
1970
.
[4]
Paul M. Postal,et al.
Aspects Of Phonological Theory
,
1968
.
[5]
Noam Chomsky,et al.
वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax
,
1965
.
[6]
Richard Stanley,et al.
Redundancy Rules in Phonology
,
1967
.
[7]
Sanford A. Schane.
The Phoneme Revisited.
,
1971
.
[8]
Noam Chomsky,et al.
The Sound Pattern of English
,
1968
.
[9]
Alan H. Sommerstein,et al.
The Sound Pattern of Ancient Greek
,
1975
.