Flexibility, friendship, and family

This article is concerned with the impact of late modernity on patterns of solidarity in friend and family relationships. It takes as its starting point the transformations in partnership, family, and household formation and dissolution that have been occurring in Western societies since the 1970s. Accepting these shifts as indicative of the greater freedoms people now have over the construction of their personal relationships and social networks, the article examines the degree to which the domains of family and friendship are merging. Its principal argument is that despite increased flexibility in the construction of personal life, including diversity in the prioritization of different relationships, at a cultural level clear boundaries exist between family and friendship ties.

[1]  Rosemary Blieszner,et al.  An Integrative Conceptual Framework for Friendship Research , 1994 .

[2]  Shelley Budgeon.  Friendship and Formations of Sociality in Late Modernity: The Challenge of ‘Post Traditional Intimacy’ , 2006 .

[3]  Ray Pahl,et al.  Between family and friends: a longitudinal study of friendship choice. , 2005, The British journal of sociology.

[4]  N. Sarkisian.  “Doing Family Ambivalence”: Nuclear and Extended Families in Single Mothers’ Lives , 2006 .

[5]  N. Keating,et al.  Characteristics of Family/Friend Care Networks of Frail Seniors , 2004, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[6]  C. Bourdais,et al.  Changes in Conjugal Life in Canada: Is Cohabitation Progressively Replacing Marriage?. , 2004 .

[7]  R. Misra,et al.  The Relationships Among Self-Esteem, Exercise, and Self-Rated Health in Older Women , 1996 .

[8]  Andrew J. Cherlin,et al.  The deinstitutionalization of American marriage , 2004 .

[9]  K. J. Asada,et al.  What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships , 2005 .

[10]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[11]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Friendly and Antagonistic Contact Between Former Spouses After Divorce , 2005 .

[12]  B. Wellman.  Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[13]  R. Pahl,et al.  Personal Communities: Not Simply Families of ‘Fate’ or ‘Choice’ , 2004 .

[14]  J. Teachman,et al.  The Changing Demography of America's Families , 2000 .

[15]  Walid A. Afifi,et al.  On Being `Just Friends': The Frequency and Impact of Sexual Activity in Crosssex Friendships , 2000 .

[16]  C. Himes,et al.  The Role of Friends in Caregiving , 2000 .

[17]  Sasha Roseneil,et al.  Cultures of Intimacy and Care beyond ‘the Family’: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early 21st Century , 2004 .

[18]  G. Allan.  Personal relationships in late modernity , 2001 .

[19]  J. Seltzer.  Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future , 2004 .

[20]  M. Clark,et al.  Measurement of communal strength , 2004 .

[21]  Bernice A. Pescosolido,et al.  The Web of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[22]  V. Bengtson.  Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds , 2001 .

[23]  J. Fraser,et al.  A Research Note on Post-Dating Relationships: The Social Embeddedness of Redefining Romantic Couplings , 1998 .

[24]  M. Nelson.  Single Mothers “Do” Family , 2006 .

[25]  A. Muraco,et al.  Intentional Families: Fictive Kin Ties Between Cross‐Gender, Different Sexual Orientation Friends , 2006 .

[26]  Kathleen Ell,et al.  Social networks, social support and coping with serious illness: the family connection. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[27]  R. Paine.  IN SEARCH OF FRIENDSHIP: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS IN 'MIDDLE-CLASS' CULTURE , 1969 .

[28]  L. Jamieson.  Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the `Pure Relationship' , 1999 .

[29]  Ethan J. Leib.  Friendship & the Law , 2006 .