Spatially separating language masker from target results in spatial and linguistic masking release.

Several studies demonstrate that in complex auditory scenes, speech recognition is improved when the competing background and target speech differ linguistically. However, such studies typically utilize spatially co-located speech sources which may not fully capture typical listening conditions. Furthermore, co-located presentation may overestimate the observed benefit of linguistic dissimilarity. The current study examines the effect of spatial separation on linguistic release from masking. Results demonstrate that linguistic release from masking does extend to spatially separated sources. The overall magnitude of the observed effect, however, appears to be diminished relative to the co-located presentation conditions.

[1]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults. , 2016, American journal of audiology.

[2]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[4]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech. , 2013, American journal of audiology.

[5]  Jon Barker,et al.  The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Database of Multichannel In-Ear and Behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[7]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Kristin J. Van Engen,et al.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Lauren Calandruccio,et al.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content. , 2012, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M. Cooke,et al.  Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.