Learning by creating and exchanging objects: The SCY experience

Science Created by You (SCY) is a project on learning in science and technology domains. SCY uses a pedagogical approach that centres around products, called 'emerging learning objects' (ELOs) that are created by students. Students work individually and collaboratively in SCY-Lab (the general SCY learning environment) on 'missions' that are guided by socio-scientific questions (for example 'How can we design a CO2-friendly house?'). Fulfilling SCY missions requires a combination of knowledge from different content areas (eg, physics, mathematics, biology, as well as social sciences). While on a SCY mission, students perform several types of learning activities that can be characterised as productive processes (experiment, game, share, explain, design, etc), they encounter multiple resources, collaborate with varying coalitions of peers and use changing constellations of tools and scaffolds. The configuration of SCY-Lab is adaptive to the actual learning situation and may provide advice to students on appropriate learning activities, resources, tools and scaffolds, or peer students who can support the learning process. The SCY project aims at students between 12 and 18 years old. In the course of the project, a total of four SCY missions will be developed, of which one is currently available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Abigail Jurist Levy,et al.  Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 , 2010 .

[3]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Talk the talk: Learner-generated podcasts as catalysts for knowledge creation , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  R. Mayer.  Rote Versus Meaningful Learning , 2002 .

[5]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Sharing educational scenario designs in practitioner communities , 2010, ICLS.

[6]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .

[7]  H. Gardner,et al.  Learning: Peering Backward and Looking Forward in the Digital Era , 2009 .

[8]  Ann C. H. Kindfield,et al.  Integrating Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation in a Technology-Supported Genetics Learning Environment , 2003 .

[9]  Pieter Wouters,et al.  Learner Performance in Multimedia Learning Arrangements: An Analysis Across Instructional Approaches , 2009 .

[10]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[11]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Sharing and Confronting Propositions in Collaborative Inquiry Learning , 2009 .

[13]  Robin Mason,et al.  E-portfolios: an assessment tool for online courses , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Design and Reflection Help Students Develop Scientific Abilities: Learning in Introductory Physics Laboratories , 2010 .

[15]  D. Jonassen.  Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[16]  J. Novak.  Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[17]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[18]  David Crismond,et al.  Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate‐and‐redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work , 2001 .

[19]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[20]  D. Hestenes.  Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[21]  Kai Pata,et al.  A Comparison of Reasoning Processes in a Collaborative Modelling Environment: Learning about genetics problems using virtual chat , 2006 .

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  A chain of cognitive changes with learning to program in logo , 1987 .

[23]  Y. Lou,et al.  Understanding Process and Affective Factors in Small Group versus Individual Learning with Technology , 2004 .