Modeling of communication infrastructure compatible to Nordic 32 power system

Smart Grid integrates communication and computation technologies into power systems. Research on interdisciplinary topics between power system and communication systems requires models for both systems. There are several power system models available representing standard power systems and real power systems. However, lacking of their corresponding communication infrastructure information leads the difficulty of communication system modeling. In this paper, a communication infrastructure model compatible to Nordic 32 power system model has been developed and presented. In this model, Wide Area Monitoring System (WAMS) is incorporated with Supervisor Control and Data Acquisition system. The parameters of this model are based on the data from a Nordic electric power utility. Validation of the model is performed through comparison of results from simulation and a previous empirical data study performed on the same utility network. In additional, this model is simulated by using different Quality of Service (QoS) mechanism. The obtained results show that congestion management mechanisms introduce slight additional delay to the highest priority traffic. But traffics with lower priority can be benefit from congestion management mechanisms. The proposed model can be widely used for other research on Nordic 32 power system.

[1]  Lars Nordström,et al.  Implementation of agent-based power flow coordination in AC/DC grids using co-simulation platform , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[2]  Marina Thottan,et al.  Differentiated services QoS in smart grid communication networks , 2011, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[3]  Lars Nordström,et al.  Design Requirements of Wide-Area Damping Systems—Using Empirical Data From a Utility IP Network , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Kun Zhu,et al.  ICT Architecture Impact on Wide Area Monitoring and Control Systems' Reliability , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  T. Subash,et al.  Performance analysis of scheduling disciplines in optical networks , 2006, 2006 IFIP International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks.

[6]  A. Bose,et al.  GridStat: A Flexible QoS-Managed Data Dissemination Framework for the Power Grid , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[7]  Patrick-Benjamin Bök,et al.  I-DWRR — An insolvency enabled scheduling scheme extending Deficit Weighted Round Robin , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[8]  Davood Babazadeh,et al.  A platform for wide area monitoring and control system ICT analysis and development , 2013, 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference.

[9]  B. Chaudhuri,et al.  Wide-area measurement-based stabilizing control of power system considering signal transmission delay , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Lars Nordström,et al.  Stateful Data Delivery Service for Wide Area Monitoring and Control Applications , 2014, 2014 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks.

[11]  Lars Nordström,et al.  Effects of bursty event traffic on synchrophasor delays in IEEE C37.118, IEC61850, and IEC60870 , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[12]  M. Pipattanasomporn,et al.  Real-time co-simulation platform using OPAL-RT and OPNET for analyzing smart grid performance , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  G. Manimaran,et al.  NASPInet Specification - An Important Step toward Its Implementation , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Carl H. Hauser,et al.  Smart Generation and Transmission With Coherent, Real-Time Data , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.