Optimization of Dual Frequency-Difference MIT Sensor Array Based on Sensitivity and Resolution Analysis

Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) is a promising technology for intracranial hematomas imaging. The existing problems in MIT are mainly low sensitivity and low resolution of the sensor array, which is necessary to be optimized. A number of optimizations exist to enhance the resolution of MIT, but so far, studies only considered the eigenvalue or singular value of the sensitivity, or the magnetic flux with noise-free data or low level of noise. In this paper, the optimization considers the intensity and uniformity of the sensitivity matrix with added noise. In order to enhance the resolution of dual frequency-difference MIT, the coil parameters optimization is studied by simulations from three aspects: the inner radius, the shape, and the number of turns. After the sensitivity analysis, the absolute dimensions of the optimal coil structure are determined. Based on the optimal structure, the brain hematoma is simulated with a human brain model and finite element method. Images are reconstructed from the modeled data with a 26-dB signal-to-noise ratio noise contaminated. The results indicated that the optimal sensor array can achieve the conductivity resolution of 0.25 S/m and the spatial resolution is 12.38% of the brain radius.

[1]  D W Armitage,et al.  Calculation of the forward problem for absolute image reconstruction in MIT. , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Wang Huaxiang EMT Sensor Optimization Based on Analysis of Sensitivity Matrix , 2011 .

[3]  Lulu Wang,et al.  Imaging of Lung Structure Using Holographic Electromagnetic Induction , 2017, IEEE Access.

[4]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[5]  M. Soleimani,et al.  Electromagnetic Tomography for Medical and Industrial Applications: Challenges and Opportunities [Point of View] , 2013, Proc. IEEE.

[6]  Jingjing Jin,et al.  Simulation study of coils sensor preferences in magnetic induction tomography , 2010, 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[7]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Magnetic Induction Tomography , 1900 .

[8]  H Griffiths,et al.  Magnetic Induction Tomography: A Measuring System for Biological Tissues , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Nevzat G. Gencer,et al.  Electrical conductivity imaging via contactless measurements , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Xianglin Chen,et al.  Flexible eddy current sensor array for proximity sensing , 2007 .

[11]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[12]  Jian Sun,et al.  Detection of Cerebral Hemorrhage in Rabbits by Time-Difference Magnetic Inductive Phase Shift Spectroscopy , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Khairul Hamimah Abas,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: A brief review , 2015 .

[14]  H. Griffiths Magnetic induction tomography , 2001 .

[15]  Deans Cameron,et al.  Optical atomic magnetometry for magnetic induction tomography of the heart , 2016 .

[16]  H Griffiths,et al.  Frequency-difference MIT imaging of cerebral haemorrhage with a hemispherical coil array: numerical modelling. , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  The effect of receiver coil orientations on the imaging performance of magnetic induction tomography , 2009 .

[18]  Joaquim Ferreira,et al.  An overview of electromagnetic inductance tomography: Description of three different systems , 1996 .