GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation.

We describe a new methodology for performing regionalized life cycle assessment and systematically choosing the spatial scale of regionalized impact assessment methods. We extend standard matrix-based calculations to include matrices that describe the mapping from inventory to impact assessment spatial supports. Uncertainty in inventory spatial data is modeled using a discrete spatial distribution function, which in a case study is derived from empirical data. The minimization of global spatial autocorrelation is used to choose the optimal spatial scale of impact assessment methods. We demonstrate these techniques on electricity production in the United States, using regionalized impact assessment methods for air emissions and freshwater consumption. Case study results show important differences between site-generic and regionalized calculations, and provide specific guidance for future improvements of inventory data sets and impact assessment methods.

[1]  Michael Blakemore,et al.  The accuracy of spatial databases , 1991 .

[2]  A. Getis,et al.  Constructing the Spatial Weights Matrix Using a Local Statistic , 2004 .

[3]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Nations in social LCA , 2011 .

[4]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[5]  A. Horvath,et al.  Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Time horizon dependent characterization factors for acidification in life-cycle assessment based on forest plant species occurrence in Europe. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[8]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[9]  A. Getis,et al.  Using AMOEBA to Create a Spatial Weights Matrix and Identify Spatial Clusters , 2006 .

[10]  Dominik Saner,et al.  The environmental relevance of freshwater consumption in global power production , 2011 .

[11]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Site-dependent Life-Cycle Impact Assessment in Sweden (5 pp) , 2005 .

[12]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .

[13]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Spatially Explicit Characterization of Acidifying and Eutrophying Air Pollution in Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2000 .

[14]  R. Heijungs,et al.  GLOBOX: A spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  S. Pfister,et al.  Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade-offs with land use. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Assessment of land use impacts on soil ecological functions: development of spatially differentiated characterization factors within a Canadian context , 2011 .

[17]  Ken Sexton,et al.  Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) , 2008 .

[18]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Reflections on spatial autocorrelation , 2007 .

[19]  Paule-Annick Davoine,et al.  Transferring Indicators into Different Partitions of Geographic Space , 2010, ICCSA.

[20]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Spatial variability of intake fractions for Canadian emission scenarios: a comparison between three resolution scales. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Linda J. Young,et al.  Linking spatial data from different sources: the effects of change of support , 2007 .

[22]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling , 1977 .

[23]  Y. Moriguchi,et al.  Site-dependent life-cycle analysis by the SAME approach: its concept usefulness, and application to the calculation of embodied impact intensity by means of an input-output analysis. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  Semiparametric Filtering of Spatial Autocorrelation: The Eigenvector Approach , 2007 .

[25]  G. Norris Impact Characterization in the Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts , 2002 .

[26]  Nicholas Chrisman,et al.  THE ERROR COMPONENT IN SPATIAL DATA , 2005 .

[27]  A. Horvath,et al.  Assessing regional intake fractions in North America. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Energy-Water Nexus in Texas , 2009 .

[29]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[30]  S. Kotsiantis,et al.  Discretization Techniques: A recent survey , 2006 .

[31]  M. Hauschild Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA , 2006 .

[32]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[33]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment - the EDIP-2003 methodology. Guidelines from the Danish EPA , 2004 .

[35]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Thomas Heck,et al.  Country-specific damage factors for air pollutants , 2001 .

[37]  A. Getis Spatial Weights Matrices , 2009 .

[38]  J. Ord,et al.  Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application , 2010 .

[39]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Part II: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions , 1997 .

[40]  A. Antón,et al.  Assessing potential desertification environmental impact in life cycle assessment , 2009 .

[41]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use , 2010 .

[42]  L. Anselin Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[43]  Koenig,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.