Emissions Benefits from Alternative Fuels and Advanced Technology in the U.S. Transit Bus Fleet

Alternative fuels and technologies offer potential for reducing emissions in public transportation. These potentials were explored by determining emissions levels and fuel consumption from the U.S. transit bus fleet and comparison of hypothetical scenarios in which implementation of specific alternative fuels and technologies is considered. Impacts from current transit bus procurements were also evaluated. Emissions benefits above and beyond the natural course of transit bus procurements were examined for new diesel buses running on ULSD fuel, diesel-electric hybrid buses, gasoline-electric hybrid buses, compressed natural gas and biodiesel. According to the analysis, reductions in emissions of CO, NMHC, NOx, PM and CO2, as well as fuel consumption, may be attained, and diesel hybrid buses yield the largest reductions in CO2 emissions and are the only technology to reduce fuel consumption relative to the present fleet. Introducing diesel-electric hybrid buses in 15% of the U.S. transit bus fleet would reduce annual end-use emissions by nearly 1,800 tons of CO, 400 tons of NMHC, 4,400 tons of NOx, 200 tons of PM, 491,400 tons of CO2, and fuel consumption by 50.66 millions of diesel gallons.

[1]  Robert A. Harley,et al.  A Fuel-Based Inventory for Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions , 1998 .

[2]  J. Sloan,et al.  Application of a Microscale Emission Factor Model for Particulate Matter to Calculate Vehicle–Generated Contributions to Fine Particulate Emissions , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  INTEGRATION MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR ESTIMATING MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS , 2004 .

[4]  David Parrish,et al.  Air Emission Inventories in North America: A Critical Assessment , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  Nigel N Clark,et al.  Field Measurements of Particulate Matter Emissions, Carbon Monoxide, and Exhaust Opacity from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  P. Barber,et al.  Remote sensing of PM, NO, CO and HC emission factors for on-road gasoline and diesel engine vehicles in Las Vegas, NV. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Yi Zheng,et al.  UCDrive: a new gridded mobile source emission inventory model , 2004 .

[8]  G. Bishop,et al.  An on-road motor vehicle emissions inventory for Denver: an efficient alternative to modeling , 2002 .

[9]  A. Huber,et al.  Development of a Microscale Emission Factor Model for CO for Predicting Real-Time Motor Vehicle Emissions , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Atmospheric emissions inventory data for heavy-duty vehicles , 1999 .

[11]  John McFadden,et al.  Use of Subsampled Traffic Data to Estimate Roadway Emissions, Including Conversion to MOBILE6 Vehicle Classifications , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.