Particle Creation and Annihilation: Two Bohmian Approaches

This paper reviews and discusses two extensions of Bohmian Mechanics to the phenomena of particle creation and annihilation typically observed in Quantum Field Theory (QFT): the so-called Bell-type Quantum Field Theory and the Dirac Sea representation. These theories have a secure metaphysical basis as they postulate a particle ontology while satisfying the requirements imposed by the Primitive Ontology approach to quantum physics. Furthermore, their methodological perspective intentionally provides a set of rules to immunize physical theories to the conceptual and technical problems plaguing the standard formulation of Quantum Mechanics and QFT. A metaphysical analysis of both theories will be given, emphasizing the relevant features of each proposal. Finally, it will be acknowledged that, despite the metaphysical virtues and niceties of these frameworks, ultimately they do not provide definitive answers to other cogent foundational issues in QFT. Thus, these theories (as well as the other Bohmian extensions to QFT) should be considered as partial solutions to the problems raised by the quantum theory of fields. This situation can be considered incentive for further research.

[1]  H. Nikolić.  QFT AS PILOT-WAVE THEORY OF PARTICLE CREATION AND DESTRUCTION , 2009, 0904.2287.

[2]  S. Colin,et al.  A Dirac sea pilot-wave model for quantum field theory , 2007, quant-ph/0701085.

[3]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Quantum Equilibrium and the Role of Operators as Observables in Quantum Theory , 2003, quant-ph/0308038.

[4]  Are all particles identical , 2004, quant-ph/0405039.

[5]  D. Dürr,et al.  Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic? , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World , 2017 .

[7]  Meinard Kuhlmann,et al.  The Ultimate Constituents of the Material World: In Search of an Ontology for Fundamental Physics , 2010 .

[8]  S. Goldstein,et al.  On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Theory , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[9]  J. Earman,et al.  Haag’s Theorem and its Implications for the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory , 2006 .

[10]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Quantum physics without quantum philosophy , 1995 .

[11]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[12]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  The primitive ontology of quantum physics: guidelines for an assessment of the proposals , 2014, 1406.0732.

[13]  K. Landsman.  Foundations of Quantum Theory: From Classical Concepts to Operator Algebras , 2017 .

[14]  Andrea Oldofredi,et al.  Stochasticity and Bell-type quantum field theory , 2018, Synthese.

[15]  D. Malament.  In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot be a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of (Localizable) Particles , 1996 .

[16]  W. Struyve.  Pilot-wave approaches to quantum field theory , 2011, 1101.5819.

[17]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  The Transcendental Character of Determinism , 1993 .

[18]  David Wallace,et al.  In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory , 2006, Synthese.

[19]  Roderich Tumulka,et al.  Predictions and Primitive Ontology in Quantum Foundations: A Study of Examples , 2012, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[20]  Bell-type quantum field theories , 2004, quant-ph/0407116.

[21]  David Wallace,et al.  Taking particle physics seriously: A critique of the algebraic approach to quantum field theory , 2011 .

[22]  Rob Clifton,et al.  No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories , 2001, quant-ph/0103041.

[23]  J. Bell,et al.  The Theory of Local Beables , 1975 .

[24]  N. Gisin.  Impossibility of covariant deterministic nonlocal hidden-variable extensions of quantum theory , 2011 .

[25]  A Persistent Particle Ontology for Quantum Field Theory in Terms of the Dirac Sea , 2019, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[26]  Charlotte Werndl.  On choosing between deterministic and indeterministic models: underdetermination and indirect evidence , 2011, Synthese.

[27]  Roderich Tumulka,et al.  Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[28]  Primitive ontology and quantum field theory , 2015 .

[29]  M. Esfeld,et al.  The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1957, Nature.

[30]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  Entanglement and disentanglement in relativistic quantum mechanics , 2014 .