Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 loss-of-function (LOF) variants treated with clopidogrel have increased risk of ischemic events. Whether genotype-guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy improves ischemic outcomes is unknown. Objective To determine the effect of a genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor strategy on ischemic outcomes in CYP2C19 LOF carriers after PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants Open-label randomized clinical trial of 5302 patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were enrolled at 40 centers in the US, Canada, South Korea, and Mexico from May 2013 through October 2018; final date of follow-up was October 2019. Interventions Patients randomized to the genotype-guided group (n = 2652) underwent point-of-care genotyping. CYP2C19 LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor and noncarriers clopidogrel. Patients randomized to the conventional group (n = 2650) were prescribed clopidogrel and underwent genotyping after 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia at 12 months. A secondary end point was major or minor bleeding at 12 months. The primary analysis was in patients with CYP2C19 LOF variants, and secondary analysis included all randomized patients. The trial had 85% power to detect a minimum hazard ratio of 0.50. Results Among 5302 patients randomized (median age, 62 years; 25% women), 82% had ACS and 18% had stable CAD; 94% completed the trial. Of 1849 with CYP2C19 LOF variants, 764 of 903 (85%) assigned to genotype-guided therapy received ticagrelor, and 932 of 946 (99%) assigned to conventional therapy received clopidogrel. The primary end point occurred in 35 of 903 CYP2C19 LOF carriers (4.0%) in the genotype-guided therapy group and 54 of 946 (5.9%) in the conventional therapy group at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43-1.02]; P = .06). None of the 11 prespecified secondary end points showed significant differences, including major or minor bleeding in CYP2C19 LOF carriers in the genotype-guided group (1.9%) vs the conventional therapy group (1.6%) at 12 months (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P = .58). Among all randomized patients, the primary end point occurred in 113 of 2641 (4.4%) in the genotype-guided group and 135 of 2635 (5.3%) in the conventional group (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.07]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance Among CYP2C19 LOF carriers with ACS and stable CAD undergoing PCI, genotype-guided selection of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with conventional clopidogrel therapy without point-of-care genotyping, resulted in no statistically significant difference in a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia based on the prespecified analysis plan and the treatment effect that the study was powered to detect at 12 months. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742117.

[1]  M. Postma,et al.  A Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Primary PCI. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  K. Bailey,et al.  Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics: State-of-the-Art Review and the TAILOR-PCI Study , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  P. Groeneveld,et al.  Trends in Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Use and Adherence Among Antiplatelet-Naive Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2016 , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[4]  H. Jneid,et al.  Ticagrelor Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[5]  D. Sargent,et al.  Genotype-based clinical trials in cardiovascular disease , 2015, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[6]  H. Gurm,et al.  Contemporary Use of Ticagrelor in Interventional Practice (from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium). , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  G. Armstrong,et al.  Practice of Epidemiology Estimating the Burden of Recurrent Events in the Presence of Competing Risks: the Method of Mean Cumulative Count , 2022 .

[8]  W. Cantor,et al.  Increased uptake of guideline-recommended oral antiplatelet therapy: insights from the Canadian acute coronary syndrome reflective. , 2014, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[9]  Jian-jun Zou,et al.  Influence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants on the antiplatelet effects and cardiovascular events in clopidogrel-treated Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention , 2012, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[10]  Edward O'Brien,et al.  Point-of-care genetic testing for personalisation of antiplatelet treatment (RAPID GENE): a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[11]  S. Hokimoto,et al.  Determination of cut-off levels for on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation based on functional CYP2C19 gene variants in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, Thrombosis research.

[12]  Y. Jang,et al.  Association of cytochrome P450 2C19*2 polymorphism with clopidogrel response variability and cardiovascular events in Koreans treated with drug-eluting stents , 2011, Heart.

[13]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium , 2011, Circulation.

[14]  E. Antman,et al.  Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[15]  S. Kaul,et al.  ACCF/AHA Clopidogrel Clinical Alert: Approaches to the FDA “Boxed Warning”: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association , 2010, Circulation.

[16]  R. Weinshilboum,et al.  Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics and individualized drug therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[17]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  E. Antman,et al.  Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R Roberts,et al.  Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. , 1987, Circulation.

[20]  J. Haybittle,et al.  Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment. , 1971, The British journal of radiology.