Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning

Tests that require memory retrieval strongly improve long-term retention in comparison to continued studying. For example, once learners know the translation of a word, restudy practice, during which they see the word and its translation again, is less effective than testing practice, during which they see only the word and retrieve the translation from memory. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we investigated the neuro-cognitive mechanisms underlying this striking testing effect. Twenty-six young adults without prior knowledge of Swahili learned the translation of 100 Swahili words and then further practiced the words in an fMRI scanner by restudying or by testing. Recall of the translations on a final memory test after one week was significantly better and faster for tested words than for restudied words. Brain regions that were more active during testing than during restudying included the left inferior frontal gyrus, ventral striatum, and midbrain areas. Increased activity in the left inferior parietal and left middle temporal areas during testing but not during restudying predicted better recall on the final memory test. Together, results suggest that testing may be more beneficial than restudying due to processes related to targeted semantic elaboration and selective strengthening of associations between retrieval cues and relevant responses, and may involve increased effortful cognitive control and modulations of memory through striatal motivation and reward circuits.

[1]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? , 2009 .

[3]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[4]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  The Neural Organization of Semantic Control: TMS Evidence for a Distributed Network in Left Inferior Frontal and Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  A. C. Butler,et al.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  C. Nico Boehler,et al.  Mesolimbic interaction of emotional valence and reward improves memory formation , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  A. Kelly,et al.  Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Masato Taira,et al.  Neural enhancement and attenuation induced by repetitive recall , 2011, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[10]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding , 2012 .

[12]  M Wimber,et al.  Prefrontal dopamine and the dynamic control of human long-term memory , 2011, Translational Psychiatry.

[13]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[14]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Semantic Memory Processes in the Frontal Lobes , 1996 .

[15]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention to Memory Are Dissociated in Posterior Parietal Cortex: Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Evidence , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Differential effects of word length and visual contrast in the fusiform and lingual gyri during , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Rewiring the brain with repeated retrieval: A parametric fMRI study of the testing effect , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: Insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[21]  D. Shohamy,et al.  Dopamine and adaptive memory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Pat Gunn,et al.  A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Url PubMed Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping , 2012 .

[24]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning , 2008, Science.

[25]  Hongkeun Kim,et al.  Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: A meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  David Badre,et al.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Hongkeun Kim,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the default-mode, dorsal, and ventral networks in episodic memory retrieval , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Eileen M. Napoliello,et al.  Neural basis of single‐word reading in Spanish–English bilinguals , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[29]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The Interaction of Lexical Semantics and Cohort Competition in Spoken Word Recognition: An fMRI Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  L. Cohen,et al.  The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production , 2006, Brain Research.

[31]  Kenneth R. Pugh,et al.  Examining Reading Development and Reading Disability in English Language Learners: Potential Contributions from Functional Neuroimaging , 2005 .

[32]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  H. Walter,et al.  The relationship between level of processing and hippocampal–cortical functional connectivity during episodic memory formation in humans , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[34]  H. Heinze,et al.  Reward-Related fMRI Activation of Dopaminergic Midbrain Is Associated with Enhanced Hippocampus- Dependent Long-Term Memory Formation , 2005, Neuron.

[35]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Mode Distinguishes the Testing Effect from the Generation Effect. , 2010 .

[37]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods , 2003, NeuroImage.

[38]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Emiliano Macaluso,et al.  Item Retrieval and Competition in Noun and Verb Generation: An fMRI Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  R. Sperling,et al.  What goes down must come up: role of the posteromedial cortices in encoding and retrieval. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[42]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Left parietal cortex is modulated by amount of recollected verbal information , 2009, Neuroreport.

[43]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[44]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  Task-Load-Dependent Activation of Dopaminergic Midbrain Areas in the Absence of Reward , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Overlapping brain activity between episodic memory encoding and retrieval: Roles of the task-positive and task-negative networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[47]  P. Hagoort On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Reward Networks in the Brain as Captured by Connectivity Measures , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[49]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Prefrontal Cortex and Long-Term Memory Encoding: An Integrative Review of Findings from Neuropsychology and Neuroimaging , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[50]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[52]  M Ingvar,et al.  Dynamic changes in the functional anatomy of thehuman brain during recall of abstract designs related topractice , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Posterior Midline and Ventral Parietal Activity is Associated with Retrieval Success and Encoding Failure , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[54]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Brain Networks Underlying Episodic Memory Retrieval This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Macrocircuits Memory Signals within the Mtl , 2022 .

[55]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect , 2006, Memory & cognition.