Recording and interpreting earthquake response of fullscale structures

Earthquake resistant design (or retrofit) of structures requires realistic and accurate physical and theoretical models. Validation and further improvement of these models can be done only by comparison with full-scale, in situ measurements of the response to earthquake excitation. This paper presents (a) a review of the principles this validation process is based on, (b) discussion of selected examples of past contributions to modeling of structures, and (c) an outline of some of the current research needs. It is concluded that, in the education of future engineers, the art of modeling full-scale structures, and breadth of knowledge in classical mechanics have been neglected, and that this trend should be reversed.

[1]  A Daley,et al.  “I Remember” , 1949, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  W. J. Duncan A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE REPRESENTATION OF MASSIVE AND ELASTIC BODIES BY SYSTEMS OF RIGD MASSES ELASTICALLY CONNECTED , 1952 .

[3]  M. Biot Are we drowning in complexity , 1963 .

[4]  A. G. Brady,et al.  Natural Periods of Vibration of Buildings , 1963 .

[5]  H. S. Ward,et al.  Determination of the natural periods of buildings , 1964 .

[6]  H. S. Ward,et al.  Wind-induced vibrations and building modes , 1966 .

[7]  Raul Husid,et al.  Gravity effects on the earthquake response of yielding structures , 1967 .

[8]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  As I remember , 1968 .

[9]  J. Whitcomb Detection of SH-type seismic shear waves by means of angular accelerometers , 1969 .

[10]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Comparisons between ambient and forced vibration experiments , 1972 .

[11]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Time and amplitude dependent response of structures , 1973 .

[12]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Hysteretic response of a nine-storey reinforced concrete building , 1974 .

[13]  Donald E. Hudson,et al.  Dynamic Tests of Full-Scale Structures , 1977 .

[14]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Contact stresses and ground motion generated by soil‐structure interaction , 1977 .

[15]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF TRAVELING SEISMIC WAVES ON THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES , 1977 .

[16]  K. J. Ives,et al.  Experimental Methods (2) , 1978 .

[17]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  A study of the apparent change in the foundation response of a nine-story reinforced concrete building , 1978, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  W. Wunderlich Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis in Structural Mechanics , 1981 .

[19]  Edward L Wilson,et al.  Theoretical Basis for CTABS80: A Computer Program for Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems. , 1981 .

[20]  Michio Iguchi,et al.  Vibration of Flexible Plate on Viscoelastic Medium , 1982 .

[21]  K. Steinbrugge,et al.  Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tsunamis: An Anatomy of Hazards , 1982 .

[22]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Effects of soil structure interaction on the response of buildings during the strong earthquake ground motion , 1986 .

[23]  J. E. Luco,et al.  On the apparent change in dynamic behavior of a nine-story reinforced concrete building , 1987 .

[24]  M. Trifunac,et al.  Scattering and Diffraction of Plane P and SV Waves by Two-Dimensional Inhomogeneities , 1988 .

[25]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Investigation of Earthquake Response of Long Buildings , 1988 .

[26]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Scattering and diffraction of plane SH-waves by two-dimensional inhomogeneities: Part I* , 1988 .

[27]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Antiplane Earthquake Waves in Long Structures , 1989 .

[28]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Propagation of earthquake waves in buildings with soft first floor , 1990 .

[29]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Note on Excitation of Long Structures by Ground Waves , 1990 .

[30]  M. Trifunac,et al.  EARTHQUAKE STRESSES IN ARCH DAMS. II, EXCITATION BY SV-, P-, AND RAYLEIGH WAVES , 1991 .

[31]  M. Trifunac,et al.  EARTHQUAKE STRESSES IN ARCH DAMS. I, THEORY AND ANTIPLANE EXCITATION , 1991 .

[32]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Radiation Damping during Two-Dimensional Building-Soil Interaction , 1991 .

[33]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  The system damping, the system frequency and the system response peak amplitudes during in‐plane building‐soil interaction , 1992 .

[34]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Digital Instrument Response Correction for the Force-Balance Accelerometer , 1992 .

[35]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  The Effects of the Wave Passage on the Response of Base-Isolated Buildings on Rigid Embedded Foundat , 1993 .

[36]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Total Loss in a Building Exposed to Earthquake Hazard, Part I: The Model; Part II: A Hypothetical Ex , 1993 .

[37]  Maria I. Todorovska,et al.  Base Isolation by a Soft First Story with Inclined Columns , 1999 .

[38]  A. Shakal,et al.  CSMP strong-motion records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1994 .

[39]  R. P. Maley,et al.  Accelerograms recorded at USGS National Strong-Motion Network stations during the Ms=6.6 Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 , 1994 .

[40]  Gin-Show Liou,et al.  EFFECT OF FLEXIBILITY ON IMPEDANCE FUNCTIONS FOR CIRCULAR FOUNDATION , 1994 .

[41]  R. Sharpe Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings , 1994 .

[42]  U. Kadakal,et al.  A comparative study on the identification methods for the autoregressive modelling from the ambient vibration records , 1996 .

[43]  Duan Wang,et al.  System Identification with Limited Observations and without Input , 1997 .

[44]  Antonino Morassi,et al.  Localizing a Notch in a Steel Frame from Frequency Measurements , 1997 .

[45]  M. Trifunac,et al.  RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR DIFFERENTIAL MOTION OF COLUMNS , 1997 .

[46]  Mihailo D. Trifunac RELATIVE EARTHQUAKE MOTION OF BUILDING FOUNDATIONS , 1997 .

[47]  Maria I. Todorovska Cross‐axis sensitivity of accelerographs with pendulum like transducers—mathematical model and the inverse problem , 1998 .

[48]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Amplification of Strong Ground Motion and Damage Patterns During the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake , 1998 .

[49]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  PERIOD FORMULAS FOR CONCRETE SHEAR WALL BUILDINGS , 1998 .

[50]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Advanced sensitivity calibration of the Los Angeles strong motion array , 1998 .

[51]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Nonlinear soil response as a natural passive isolation mechanism—the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake , 1998 .

[52]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Experimental evidence for flexibility of a building foundation supported by concrete friction piles , 1999 .

[53]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Common problems in automatic digitization of strong motion accelerograms , 1999 .

[54]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .