Research Note - How Semantics and Pragmatics Interact in Understanding Conceptual Models
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jennifer Wiley,et al. Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[2] Frank Parker. Linguistics for non-linguists , 1986 .
[3] Bernhard Thalheim,et al. Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Conceptual Modelling , 2012, NLDB.
[4] John Benjafield,et al. Cognition, 3rd ed. , 2007 .
[5] Ron Weber,et al. Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..
[6] Peter Fettke,et al. How Conceptual Modeling Is Used , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[7] Richard C. Anderson,et al. Effects of Vocabulary Difficulty, Text Cohesion, and Schema Availability on Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 225. , 1981 .
[8] Frederico T. Fonseca,et al. The double role of ontologies in information science research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] Michelene T. H. Chi,et al. Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .
[10] Anthony J. Sanford,et al. Context, Attention and Depth of Processing During Interpretation , 2002 .
[11] Joerg Evermann,et al. Ontological Modeling Rules for UML: An Empirical Assessment , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..
[12] I Vessey,et al. The effect of the application domain in IS problem solving: A theoretical analysis , 2007 .
[13] Andrew Gemino,et al. A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques , 2004, Requirements Engineering.
[14] Suprateek Sarker,et al. Does the use of computer-based BPC tools contribute to redesign effectiveness? Insights from a hermeneutic study , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[15] Venkataraman Ramesh,et al. Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[16] Kathryn Riley,et al. Linguistics for Non-Linguists: A Primer with Exercises , 1999 .
[17] Ron Weber,et al. Guidelines for Empirical Evaluations of Conceptual Modeling Grammars , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[18] J. Wiley. Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[19] Irit Hadar,et al. Applying ontology-based rules to conceptual modeling: a reflection on modeling decision making , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[20] Vijayan Sugumaran,et al. A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[21] J. Brooks. Why most published research findings are false: Ioannidis JP, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece , 2008 .
[22] Jeffrey Parsons. An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representing Property Precedence on the Comprehension of Conceptual Schemas , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[23] Lorne Olfman,et al. Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[24] Mario Piattini,et al. Defining and validating metrics for assessing the understandability of entity-relationship diagrams , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..
[25] Paul C. van Fenema,et al. Cocreating Understanding and Value in Distributed Work: How Members of Onsite and Offshore Vendor Teams Give, Make, Demand, and Break Sense , 2008, MIS Q..
[26] Danielle S. McNamara,et al. Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts , 2009 .
[27] Louise McNally,et al. Semantics and pragmatics. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[28] Dag I. K. Sjøberg,et al. Evaluating the effect of a delegated versus centralized control style on the maintainability of object-oriented software , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[29] Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al. Information Modeling Based on Semantic an Pragmatic Meaning , 2005 .
[30] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Language, meaning and context: pragmatics , 2002 .
[31] R. Stamper. Signs, Information, Norms and Systems , 1996 .
[32] Patricia A. Alexander,et al. Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. , 1992 .
[33] Mira Kajko-Mattsson,et al. Classes of Distributed Agile Development Problems , 2010, 2010 Agile Conference.
[34] Keng Siau,et al. Evaluation techniques for systems analysis and design modelling methods – a review and comparative analysis , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..
[35] Ritu Agarwal,et al. Cognitive Fit in Requirements Modeling: A Study of Object and Process Methodologies , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[36] David Wastell,et al. The fetish of technique: methodology as a social defence , 1996 .
[37] Keng Siau,et al. Informational and Computational Equivalence in Comparing Information Modeling Methods , 2004, J. Database Manag..
[38] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Philosophical Foundations , 1995 .
[39] Keng Siau,et al. Advanced Topics In Database Research , 2005 .
[40] Irit Hadar,et al. The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: an exploratory study , 2012, Requirements Engineering.
[41] Marta Indulska,et al. Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? , 2011, MIS Q..
[42] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.
[43] R. Mayer. Models for Understanding , 1989 .
[44] Emmanuelle Vaast,et al. Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..
[45] Matthew Kramer,et al. R 2 STATISTICS FOR MIXED MODELS , 2005 .
[46] T. J. Teorey,et al. A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model , 1986, CSUR.
[47] Ron Weber,et al. On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..
[48] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Information systems development and data modelling: conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1995 .
[49] Jennifer Wiley,et al. The influence of domain knowledge on the functional capacity of working memory , 2009 .
[50] Jeffrey Parsons,et al. What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[51] Helen Kelley,et al. Research Commentary - Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects - A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..
[52] Edward Yourdon,et al. Modern structured analysis , 1989 .
[53] R. Carston. Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics , 2002 .
[54] Peter J. Denning. Great Principles of Computing , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.
[55] Ron Weber,et al. Ontological foundations of information systems , 1997 .
[56] Danielle S. McNamara,et al. Reversing the Reverse Cohesion Effect: Good Texts Can Be Better for Strategic, High-Knowledge Readers , 2007 .
[57] Daniel L. Moody,et al. The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[58] Yair Wand,et al. Guidelines for Designing Visual Ontologies to Support Knowledge Identification , 2011, MIS Q..
[59] Veda C. Storey,et al. A semiotics framework for information systems classification and development , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..
[60] Linda Dawson,et al. The use of object-oriented models in requirements engineering: a field study , 1999, ICIS.
[61] Michael F. Bunting,et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[62] Ron Weber,et al. Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams , 1999, ICIS.
[63] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. The Hole in the Whole: A Response to Allen and March , 2012, MIS Q..
[64] Frederico T. Fonseca,et al. The double role of ontologies in information science research: Research Articles , 2007 .
[65] Young-Gul Kim,et al. Comparing data modeling formalisms , 1995, CACM.
[66] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .
[67] Marta Indulska,et al. How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..
[68] Joerg Evermann,et al. Ontology based object-oriented domain modelling: fundamental concepts , 2005, Requirements Engineering.
[69] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: an empirical evaluation , 2008 .
[70] Allen Newell,et al. Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .
[71] Iris Vessey,et al. Requirements specification: learning object, process, and data methodologies , 1994, CACM.
[72] Yair Wand,et al. Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..
[73] Jeffrey Parsons,et al. How UML is used , 2006, CACM.
[74] Alice M. Tybout,et al. Designing Research for Application , 1981 .
[75] J. Lyons. Language, meaning, and context , 1981 .
[76] Arne Sølvberg,et al. Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.
[77] L. Thompson,et al. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity , 2005 .
[78] Peter Aiken,et al. Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1997 .
[79] Salvatore T. March,et al. The Effects of State-Based and Event-Based Data Representation on User Performance in Query Formulation Tasks , 2006, MIS Q..
[80] R. Mayer,et al. Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .
[81] Yair Wand,et al. Choosing classes in conceptual modeling , 1997, CACM.
[82] William F. Brewer,et al. The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .
[83] Abraham Silberschatz,et al. Database System Concepts , 1980 .