Actual and ideal self-congruity affecting consumers' emotional and behavioral responses toward an online store

Actual self-congruity positively affects the evaluation of visual and information atmospheric cues of an online store.Ideal self-congruity negatively affects the evaluation of visual and information atmospheric cues of an online store.The positive evaluations of visual and information atmospheric cues lead to delight.Delight increases the consumer's purchasing intention from an online store. Recognizing that a consumer's congruity judgment with a store image can be formed with both actual and ideal self-images, this study investigates the differential effects that these two congruity judgments might have on a consumer's evaluation of an online store. The results indicate that the closer the image of an online store is to the consumer's actual self, the more favorably the store is evaluated. Interestingly, however, the proximity between the image of an online store and a consumer's ideal self has a negative effect on consumer evaluation toward the store. The results also indicate that the positive visual cues of an online store generate consumer delight more significantly than information cues do. Consumer delight is found to significantly increase the intention to make an initial purchase from the store.

[1]  Dong-Mo Koo,et al.  Inter-relationships among dominance, energetic and tense arousal, and pleasure, and differences in their impacts under online vs. offline environment , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior , 1991 .

[3]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions , 2002 .

[4]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  To Delight, or Not to Delight? This is the Question Service Firms Must Address , 2010 .

[5]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior , 2006 .

[6]  Allard C. R. van Riel,et al.  Modelling consumer responses to an apparel store brand: Store image as a risk reducer , 2009 .

[7]  Drew Martin,et al.  Self-image congruence in consumer behavior , 2012 .

[8]  R. Yan,et al.  Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior , 2011 .

[9]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[10]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[11]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[12]  Y. Ekinci,et al.  An investigation of self-concept: actual and ideal self-congruence compared in the context of service evaluation , 2003 .

[13]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[14]  Salvador Ruiz,et al.  The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior , 2009 .

[15]  A. Carle.  Interpreting the results of studies using latent variable models to assess data quality: an empirical example using confirmatory factor analysis , 2010 .

[16]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. , 1987, Psychological review.

[17]  Hooman Estelami,et al.  Competitive and Procedural Determinants of Delight and Disappointment in Consumer Complaint Outcomes , 2000 .

[18]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Destination Image, Self-Congruity, and Travel Behavior: Toward an Integrative Model , 2000 .

[19]  R. Collins.  For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations , 1996 .

[20]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic , 2008, Psychometrika.

[21]  Lenita M. Davis,et al.  Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications , 2001 .

[22]  R. Oliver.  Customer delight: Foundations, findings, and managerial insight☆ , 1997 .

[23]  Banwari Mittal,et al.  A Study of the Concept of Affective Choice Mode For Consumer Decisions , 1994 .

[24]  Jang-Han Lee,et al.  Identifying Attentional Bias and Emotional Response After Appearance-Related Stimuli Exposure , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  P. Kotler.  Atmospherics as a Marketing Tool , 1974 .

[26]  M. Sirgy,et al.  A path analytic model of store loyalty involving self-concept, store image, geographic loyalty, and socioeconomic status , 1985 .

[27]  F. Sultan,et al.  Are the Drivers and Role of Online Trust the Same for All Web Sites and Consumers?: A Large-Scale Exploratory Empirical Study , 2005 .

[28]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review , 1982 .

[29]  James P. Nehf.  Shopping for Privacy on the Internet , 2007 .

[30]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Upscale image transfer from malls to stores: A self-image congruence explanation , 2006 .

[31]  Adam Finn,et al.  Customer Delight , 2012 .

[32]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[33]  M. Gouthier,et al.  Delighting Consumers Click by Click , 2013 .

[34]  A. Pruyn,et al.  You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation , 2007 .

[35]  Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. , 1999 .

[36]  B. Schneider,et al.  Understanding Customer Delight and Outrage , 1999 .

[37]  N. Malhotra.  Self concept and product choice: an integrated perspective , 1988 .

[38]  A. Tesser.  Reproductions Supplied by Edrs Are the Best That Can Be Made * * from the Original Document. toward a Self-evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior* , 2007 .

[39]  Charles S. Gulas,et al.  Extending Social Comparison: An Examination of the Unintended Consequences of Idealized Advertising Imagery , 2000 .

[40]  P. Ngobo,et al.  Decreasing Returns in Customer Loyalty: Does It Really Matter to Delight the Customers? , 1999 .

[41]  R. Oliver,et al.  The Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction , 1991 .

[42]  K. A. Morris,et al.  When comparisons arise. , 1995 .

[43]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Barry Cohen,et al.  The “WOW” effect: How one restaurateur continues to delight customers , 1997 .

[45]  A. Ahuvia,et al.  Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love , 2006 .

[46]  David Mazursky,et al.  Exploring the Development of Store Images , 1986 .

[47]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Web site customer orientations, Web site quality, and purchase intentions: The role of Web site personality , 2009 .

[48]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[49]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment , 2001 .

[50]  Marie J. Lachance,et al.  Adolescents’ brand sensitivity in apparel: influence of three socialization agents , 2003 .

[51]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Self-Enhancement as a Motivation for Sharing Online Advertising , 2012 .

[52]  C. Hopkins,et al.  Pioneering the Development of a Scale to Measure E-Tailer Image , 2005 .

[53]  Sejin Ha,et al.  Identifying the Role of Self-Congruence on Shopping Behavior in the Context of U.S. Shopping Malls , 2012 .

[54]  Youn-Kyung Kim,et al.  The Effects of Website Designs, Self-Congruity, and Flow on Behavioral Intention , 2012 .

[55]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response mode , 1995 .

[56]  Heesup Han,et al.  Image Congruence and Relationship Quality in Predicting Switching Intention , 2013 .

[57]  Dong-Mo Koo,et al.  The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation , 1985 .